![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rocky Mountain News
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drm...9,DRMN_49_398= 5222,00.html Too many companies for too few deals jolt satellite-imaging industry By Roger Fillion, Rocky Mountain News August 8, 2005 The Pentagon official who telephoned the Dulles, Va., headquarters of Orbimage Inc. last September had big news for the commercial spy satellite company. It was news that would send shock waves through the offices of another company, one in Colorado. The official delivered the message to the three Orbimage executives anxiously awaiting word: The company had won a $500 million contract to build and operate a next-generation commercial spy satellite. Orbimage - which had emerged from bankruptcy less than a year earlier - had beaten larger rival Space Imaging Inc. of Thornton. After the call, the elated Orbimage executives slapped high-fives to celebrate. The news marked a turning point in the nation's fledgling spy satellite industry: A shakeout had begun. Today, Orbimage and DigitalGlobe Inc. of Longmont are emerging as future leaders. Both beat Space Imaging for separate $500 million Pentagon awards to deploy satellites that can photograph objects 1 to 2 feet across in size. Space Imaging drew the short straw, unable to build a new satellite to replace an aging "bird" now orbiting Earth. The company is for sale. "There's a natural shaking out going on here," said professor Joanne Gabrynowicz, head of the National Remote Sensing and Space Law Center at the University of Mississippi. "There are only two government contracts and three companies," she added, noting the commercial spy satellite business remains dependent on Uncle Sam's deep pockets. "That's the main client." The Pentagon, in particular, is the big client. It has, for example, used commercial photos to hunt for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and to wage war there. A deal to sell Space Imaging could be signed by summer's end. But that isn't assured. Speculation is rife that DigitalGlobe and Orbimage are among the interested buyers. Both declined to comment. Space Imaging wouldn't comment for this story. Alternatively, owners Lockheed Martin Corp. and Raytheon Co. may not sell Space Imaging, whose existing satellite is expected to work until at least mid-2008. Space Imaging had been the odds-on favorite to land one of the $500 million Pentagon contracts, dubbed NextView. But officials at the Pentagon's National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which doled out the awards, thought otherwise. "The winners were selected based on the bidding criteria and the best value to the government," said NGA spokesman Dave Burpee. Fallout in Colorado Space Imaging losses hit Colorado. It's an open question whether the state - as home to DigitalGlobe and Space Imaging - can still claim bragging rights as the hub for the commercial spy satellite industry. Virginia can point to Orbimage. What caused this turn of events, with Space Imaging getting bested by two smaller rivals in pursuit of the NextView deals? In yet another case, the company failed to nail down a NextView contract when it negotiated with the NGA in the absence of competitors. "Space Imaging lost this at different times for different reasons," said analyst Edward Jurkevics of Chesapeake Analytics in Arlington, Va. Industry experts and officials cite various factors: =B7 Owners Lockheed and Raytheon made clear in late 2002 they weren't prepared to sink another dime into Space Imaging. With its financial options limited, Space Imaging was forced to put conditions on the bids it placed with the NGA - terms that cut the proposals' competitiveness. =B7 As Pentagon contractors less accustomed to live-or-die competition, Lockheed and Raytheon injected a more traditional, white-collar culture into Space Imaging. It wasn't one always focused on camaraderie throughout the ranks - or serving a key customer, the NGA. DigitalGlobe and Orbimage, in contrast, showed more entrepreneurial zeal focused on serving the customer's needs - such as delivering a satellite within the time frame stipulated by Uncle Sam. =B7 Having Lockheed and Raytheon as owners limited Space Imaging's ability to shop around among suppliers. Lockheed would make the company's satellites and Raytheon the ground system. =B7 Commercial demand for high-resolution satellite imagery has been slow to materialize and by itself can't support the industry. "It's obvious there is not a commercial market for it," said John Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org. "The challenge is how do you make this thing work without a contract from the NGA," he added, referring to the Pentagon agency. Some commercial success There have been successes. Google Inc.'s online mapping product uses imagery from DigitalGlobe and others to allow users to zero in on spots around the globe. Similarly, Microsoft Corp.'s own Web service uses aerial photography and satellite images to pinpoint places on Earth. Orbimage struck an exclusive deal to supply high-resolution satellite images. Other commercial users include the oil and gas industries, local governments and power companies. For Space Imaging, its owners have played a big role in the company's fate. Lockheed and Raytheon together hold a 77 percent stake in the private company. Space Imaging has experienced a roller-coaster ride. It's first high-resolution satellite was destroyed in a rocket failure in 1999. But the company deployed a replacement later that year, beating rivals to the punch. It marked the start of the high-resolution commercial remote sensing industry. Previously, Uncle Sam had a monopoly. Still, owners Lockheed and Raytheon didn't see a big enough future in the business. In late 2002, Lockheed wrote off a $163 million investment in Space Imaging and told its shareholders it wasn't prepared to invest more cash. Raytheon did the same, writing off $175 million. "It just wasn't core to the pursuit of opportunities in our growth markets of defense, homeland security, government IT and intelligence," said Lockheed spokesman Thomas Greer. Raytheon spokesman Steve Brecken declined to comment. Industry experts say that decision made it tougher for Space Imaging to persuade the NGA to award the company one of the two $500 million contracts that were separately up for grabs in 2003 and 2004. Assigning blame At rival DigitalGlobe, CEO Herb Satterlee is outspoken in assigning blame for Space Imaging's loss last year to Orbimage. "That wasn't Space Imaging's fault. Space Imaging didn't have the support of their ownership," said Satterlee. "That was tragic." How so? Space Imaging had to attach conditions to bids it submitted to the NGA, once called the National Imagery and Mapping Agency. In 2003, when DigitalGlobe won, Space Imaging said it would round up loans to finance its share of building a new satellite - provided the company got the contract, which would be used to secure the loans. In early 2004, Space Imaging got the opportunity to negotiate one- on-one with the NGA for a NextView deal after DigitalGlobe's victory. But owners Lockheed and Raytheon - reluctant to be on the hook for more money - insisted Space Imaging get the right to scrap any deal if satellite-construction funding couldn't be raised within a certain time. NGA officials ended talks. Later in 2004, when Orbimage won, Space Imaging's bid included the condition that if it won, owners Lockheed and Raytheon would sell the company to a consortium led by financially viable L-3 Communications Holdings Inc. However, NGA officials clearly were uneasy with conditions written into the offer. So the NGA tapped Orbimage, which had lined up funding to pay its share of satellite construction. "We got commitments from our investors," said Orbimage Senior Vice President Timothy Puckorius. Another factor that hampered Space Imaging: A decision to propose delivering a next-generation satellite after the date stipulated by the government. While DigitalGlobe promised to adhere to the timing, Space Imaging and satellite supplier Lockheed proposed a later date. "The proposal that Space Imaging turned in didn't recognize that requirement as being important," said one former employee. (DigitalGlobe had to delay deployment of its new satellite because the supplier providing the camera encountered snags. The company still plans to launch it by 2006.) Corporate culture Other factors were at play at the time - such as corporate culture. DigitalGlobe employees wore jeans and sneakers, much like at a startup. CEO Satterlee even wore shorts. Space Imaging was more formal. Executives wore ties and suits, more in line with the culture at Lockheed and Raytheon. Current CEO Bob Dalal has Lockheed roots. The previous CEO was a Raytheon veteran. "It was run like an aerospace company," another former Space Imaging employee said of the company. "It couldn't run fast and light." Attempts to loosen the atmosphere and build camaraderie didn't always sit well with top brass. For example, a keg of beer occasionally was brought to the company's back parking lot for people to enjoy. Top executives, however, were unenthusiastic about management joining the festivities. "They didn't want to see the managers out there," said one of the former employees. Back in 2003, the industry's chief rivalry was centered in Colorado. Space Imaging and DigitalGlobe had established, operating high-resolution satellites. And while DigitalGlobe had won the first NextView deal that year, Space Imaging was determined to nail down its own award next time. Orbimage, by contrast, had only launched its first high-resolution satellite in June 2003. Once Orbimage captured the second NextView contract last year, however, the DigitalGlobe-Space Imaging rivalry changed. "That ended any rivalry," said Orbimage's Puckorius. But DigitalGlobe's Satterlee says Orbimage isn't on his radar screen. "Space Imaging has been our competitor. And today in the marketplace I do not see them," the CEO said of Orbimage. But he added, "They will be there." Imagery's impact While the Pentagon has been a big buyer of high-resolution satellite photos, businesses and local governments also are purchasing the photos and using them in ways that can affect ordinary citizens. Here's a look at how the imagery can be - and is - used: =B7 Farmers: Checking crops for disease. =B7 Timber companies: Managing their stands of trees. =B7 Oil and gas companies: Keeping an eye out for pipeline leaks or determining where to sink a well. =B7 Local governments: Mapping boundaries. =B7 Google and Microsoft: Providing Web-based services that allow users to zero in on spots around the globe. =B7 Power companies: Eyeing transmission lines to see whether trees may need to be trimmed. Space Imaging Inc. =B7 Headquarters: Thornton =B7 Employees: About 175 =B7 Ownership: Lockheed Martin and Raytheon majority owners =B7 Status: One orbiting high-resolution satellite; company for sale or 303-892-2467 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Msnbc (Oberg): Why NASA's making the right decision | Jim Oberg | Policy | 27 | August 2nd 05 04:03 AM |
Msnbc (Oberg): Why NASA's making the right decision | Jim Oberg | Space Shuttle | 30 | August 2nd 05 04:03 AM |
New NASA Imagery Sheds Additional Perspectives On Tsunami | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 0 | January 20th 05 12:57 AM |
Titan Radar Imagery | Bernard Isker | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 18th 04 08:37 PM |
From 2D to 3D to 4D: NASA Satellite imagery in 3 and 4 dimensions | John Kavanagh | Science | 0 | July 23rd 04 07:15 PM |