![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Man, I have got the fever and I have never even looked through it. I didn't
realize it had an H-alpha filter in the package (it does, right?) I just made my Dob purchase, but in the future, would it be a waste to buy the PST when you can buy a regular refractor and just add the filters? One, I have heard that it can damage your optics, and two, those filters seem to cost four figures. Am I missing something here, or is the PST the only affordable way to view the sun in all it's glory (most of it anyways)? Thanks, -Tom |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 21:52:33 -0700, "Tom" wrote:
Man, I have got the fever and I have never even looked through it. I didn't realize it had an H-alpha filter in the package (it does, right?) I just made my Dob purchase, but in the future, would it be a waste to buy the PST when you can buy a regular refractor and just add the filters? One, I have heard that it can damage your optics, and two, those filters seem to cost four figures. Am I missing something here, or is the PST the only affordable way to view the sun in all it's glory (most of it anyways)? Thanks, -Tom Hello, Only a few words... PST is much cheapper than filters.... And it works really GREAT !!! very quick to ajust.... Rally nice, you will never regrett it... I'm using it every day...... (when there is no cloud..... not very often this summer) Best Greetings From SWITZERLAND Philippe HAAKE ICQ 3128404 http://astrosurf.com/skylover/ http://astrosurf.com/skylover/meteo http://www.astro-ge.net/ http://community.webshots.com/user/beruberu1 beruberu@NOSBSPAMfreesurfDOTch !!!!!!REMOVE NOSBSPAM FROM MY E-MAIL!!!!!! Spammers, here are some email addresses for your spambots: $LOGIN@localhost $LOGNAME@localhost $USER@localhost $USER@$HOST -h1024@localhost admin@loopback |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Definitely the most affordable now. I have one and it is great!
Tom wrote: Man, I have got the fever and I have never even looked through it. I didn't realize it had an H-alpha filter in the package (it does, right?) I just made my Dob purchase, but in the future, would it be a waste to buy the PST when you can buy a regular refractor and just add the filters? One, I have heard that it can damage your optics, and two, those filters seem to cost four figures. Am I missing something here, or is the PST the only affordable way to view the sun in all it's glory (most of it anyways)? Thanks, -Tom |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Philippe HAAKE wrote: Only a few words... PST is much cheapper than filters.... And it works really GREAT !!! very quick to ajust.... Rally nice, you will never regrett it... I'm using it every day...... (when there is no cloud..... not very often this summer) Here, too. I fear the advent and proliferation of the PST may bring on an ice age :-) Phil |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom" wrote in
: Man, I have got the fever and I have never even looked through it. I didn't realize it had an H-alpha filter in the package (it does, right?) I just made my Dob purchase, but in the future, would it be a waste to buy the PST when you can buy a regular refractor and just add the filters? One, I have heard that it can damage your optics, and two, those filters seem to cost four figures. Am I missing something here, or is the PST the only affordable way to view the sun in all it's glory (most of it anyways)? PST (with 12mm eyepiece) = $499 Add 18mm CEMAX eyepiece = $99 Total price = $598 Disadvantages: 1. Solar scope ONLY. Cannot be used for night time or terrestrial observing. 2. Diameter of internal etalon filter is only 25mm. For the same setup on a regular refractor: Small Refractor = $500-2000 SM-40 HA filter = $995 Blocking filter = $455 Adapter plate = $175 12mm eyepiece = $125 18mm eyepiece = $125 Low end price = $2375 High end price = $3875 Advantages: Can be used as night time or terrestrial scope. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Lawler wrote:
PST (with 12mm eyepiece) = $499 Add 18mm CEMAX eyepiece = $99 Total price = $598 Not sure the 18mm CEMAX is a must have: around 10mm still gives a full disc image. The supplied kelner is fairly good - certainly not 99$ better than the kelner and the image is much smaller. I use my PST a lot with children and adult newbies - the longer eye-relief of the ceemax can be a problem as newbies tend to get too close and perhaps see nothing without being talked through it. But the PST is astounding value: a breathtking addition to the arsenal. -- Martin Frey http://www.hadastro.org.uk N 51 02 E 0 47 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I looked through a PST at RTMC, and it was awesome.
Matthew Ota Tom wrote: Man, I have got the fever and I have never even looked through it. I didn't realize it had an H-alpha filter in the package (it does, right?) I just made my Dob purchase, but in the future, would it be a waste to buy the PST when you can buy a regular refractor and just add the filters? One, I have heard that it can damage your optics, and two, those filters seem to cost four figures. Am I missing something here, or is the PST the only affordable way to view the sun in all it's glory (most of it anyways)? Thanks, -Tom |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Lawler wrote in message:
Advantages & Disadvantages to the Coronado PST Hi Paul, I want one in the worst possible way, but I'll add another disadvantage to your very short list... Not possible to use a binoviewer. I love my Denk II binoviewers and have discovered that with the PST's internal focus mechanism, there is insufficient back-focus to use the binos, regardless of configuration. I've looked at and through the PST at a recent star party and was so extremely impressed that suddenly the lack of binoviewing seemed less of an issue. Somewhere I encountered a graphic that someone put together of 2 PST's duct-taped together to form a bino pair. It got me to thinking... Clear skies, Dave Jessie |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . 202, Paul
Lawler wrote: 2. Diameter of internal etalon filter is only 25mm. Not an issue. The aperture of the PST is 40mm. The light cone doesn't encounter the etalon until it's narrow enough to be accommodated by its small diameter. -- Joe Bergeron http://www.joebergeron.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am a long-time user of a Tak FS-60C with a Coronado SolarMax 40. I just
recently got a PST, and I am very impressed with what this scope can do. It has much greater image brightness at higher magnifications, and the only thing the PST loses with respect to the SM40 are the really fine filaments and plage detail. Filiments and bright plage are still very evident, and the prominences are utterly fantastic. I also have to option of attaching my SM40 to the end of the PST to narrow the bandpass even further, giving me a disc image that is much more detailed and contrasty than the SM40 alone could have achieved. Many H-A filters have an etalon towards the back end of the light cone...my friend's Solar Spectrum scope was like that. It makes no difference. Mark The Catman ^..^ www.geocities.com/mark_rosengarten Owner/Coordinator of the Neko Ultraportable Solar Observatory Fun WITH The Sun for Everyone! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help! H-alpha Solar Observing: Coronado Maxscope 40 or SM40/10? | Craig Levine | Amateur Astronomy | 22 | April 21st 04 05:01 PM |
Mount for Coronado PST | Kilolani | Amateur Astronomy | 52 | April 11th 04 12:10 AM |
Coronado Solarmax 40 vs 60 | KC | Amateur Astronomy | 25 | February 24th 04 07:49 PM |