![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm looking for some comments from Coronado Maxscope users. Which
would you prefer - a double-stacked 40mm or a single 60mm? Obviously the image of the Sun in the 40mm will be dimmer but more detailed. But would it be too dim for public viewing? The double stacked 40mm is actually $600 cheaper than a 60mm and half the cost of the double stacked 60mm. Would appreciate any comments on this, thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not too many of us can afford the luxury of twin 60mm. Coronados. The truth
is that only a few of us have the single version of these filters. Getting back to your question: I own a single 60mm which fits on a Pronto. In order to make the Pronto pull double duty, all I need do is unscrew the filter and I'm good to go. Besides, I recently read a report of the Maxscope on Cloudynights.com and learned that the owner was not too happy with it. So my question is, why do you want a Maxscope? Al "KC" wrote in message om... I'm looking for some comments from Coronado Maxscope users. Which would you prefer - a double-stacked 40mm or a single 60mm? Obviously the image of the Sun in the 40mm will be dimmer but more detailed. But would it be too dim for public viewing? The double stacked 40mm is actually $600 cheaper than a 60mm and half the cost of the double stacked 60mm. Would appreciate any comments on this, thanks. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not too many of us can afford the luxury of twin 60mm. Coronados. The truth
is that only a few of us have the single version of these filters. Getting back to your question: I own a single 60mm which fits on a Pronto. In order to make the Pronto pull double duty, all I need do is unscrew the filter and I'm good to go. Besides, I recently read a report of the Maxscope on Cloudynights.com and learned that the owner was not too happy with it. So my question is, why do you want a Maxscope? Al "KC" wrote in message om... I'm looking for some comments from Coronado Maxscope users. Which would you prefer - a double-stacked 40mm or a single 60mm? Obviously the image of the Sun in the 40mm will be dimmer but more detailed. But would it be too dim for public viewing? The double stacked 40mm is actually $600 cheaper than a 60mm and half the cost of the double stacked 60mm. Would appreciate any comments on this, thanks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not too many of us can afford the luxury of twin 60mm. Coronados.
Yes, I know, that's why I'm wondering about the stacked 40mm. The truth is that only a few of us have the single version of these filters. Getting back to your question: I own a single 60mm which fits on a Pronto. In order to make the Pronto pull double duty, all I need do is unscrew the filter and I'm good to go. Besides, I recently read a report of the Maxscope on Cloudynights.com and learned that the owner was not too happy with it. Odd -- I've seen the single 40mm and 60 mm Maxscopes and they are both quite nice and compare favorably with Daystar filters. I was just reading cloudynights.com last night - I did not see any negative comments. So my question is, why do you want a Maxscope? Why the hell not?! Seriously, I'm looking for a dedicated solar telescope. It would be piggybacked on an SCT to provide both white light & H-alpha views for educational use. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not too many of us can afford the luxury of twin 60mm. Coronados.
Yes, I know, that's why I'm wondering about the stacked 40mm. The truth is that only a few of us have the single version of these filters. Getting back to your question: I own a single 60mm which fits on a Pronto. In order to make the Pronto pull double duty, all I need do is unscrew the filter and I'm good to go. Besides, I recently read a report of the Maxscope on Cloudynights.com and learned that the owner was not too happy with it. Odd -- I've seen the single 40mm and 60 mm Maxscopes and they are both quite nice and compare favorably with Daystar filters. I was just reading cloudynights.com last night - I did not see any negative comments. So my question is, why do you want a Maxscope? Why the hell not?! Seriously, I'm looking for a dedicated solar telescope. It would be piggybacked on an SCT to provide both white light & H-alpha views for educational use. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which would you prefer - a double-stacked 40mm or a single 60mm?
I have a 60 mounted on my Tak FS60C. I doubt that anything smaller would show the granulations clearly. No personal experience on this but I have read that double stacking enhances detail on the disk at the expense of the prominences. Dick H Burlington, VT |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which would you prefer - a double-stacked 40mm or a single 60mm?
I have a 60 mounted on my Tak FS60C. I doubt that anything smaller would show the granulations clearly. No personal experience on this but I have read that double stacking enhances detail on the disk at the expense of the prominences. Dick H Burlington, VT |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It depends on which day you ask me... or what time of the day.
The 60 will take magnification more readily and if you're looking towards doing any imaging that's probably the direction you should take. For visual the double-stacked 40 will show excellent contrast on the solar disc that takes a bit more study with a wider bandpass system to appreciate. We're on the road starting right now so if you have a chance to meet up with us at the larger star parties we'll be happy to show you the differences at the eyepiece. Regards, Bill Dean Coronado Technology Group On 20 Feb 2004 20:22:37 -0800, (KC) wrote: I'm looking for some comments from Coronado Maxscope users. Which would you prefer - a double-stacked 40mm or a single 60mm? Obviously the image of the Sun in the 40mm will be dimmer but more detailed. But would it be too dim for public viewing? The double stacked 40mm is actually $600 cheaper than a 60mm and half the cost of the double stacked 60mm. Would appreciate any comments on this, thanks. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It depends on which day you ask me... or what time of the day.
The 60 will take magnification more readily and if you're looking towards doing any imaging that's probably the direction you should take. For visual the double-stacked 40 will show excellent contrast on the solar disc that takes a bit more study with a wider bandpass system to appreciate. We're on the road starting right now so if you have a chance to meet up with us at the larger star parties we'll be happy to show you the differences at the eyepiece. Regards, Bill Dean Coronado Technology Group On 20 Feb 2004 20:22:37 -0800, (KC) wrote: I'm looking for some comments from Coronado Maxscope users. Which would you prefer - a double-stacked 40mm or a single 60mm? Obviously the image of the Sun in the 40mm will be dimmer but more detailed. But would it be too dim for public viewing? The double stacked 40mm is actually $600 cheaper than a 60mm and half the cost of the double stacked 60mm. Would appreciate any comments on this, thanks. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "KC" wrote in message om... Not too many of us can afford the luxury of twin 60mm. Coronados. Yes, I know, that's why I'm wondering about the stacked 40mm. The truth is that only a few of us have the single version of these filters. Getting back to your question: I own a single 60mm which fits on a Pronto. In order to make the Pronto pull double duty, all I need do is unscrew the filter and I'm good to go. Besides, I recently read a report of the Maxscope on Cloudynights.com and learned that the owner was not too happy with it. Odd -- I've seen the single 40mm and 60 mm Maxscopes and they are both quite nice and compare favorably with Daystar filters. I was just reading cloudynights.com last night - I did not see any negative comments. The review I read was not a comparison between the Coronado and other systems, it was only the owner's review of the Maxscope. Toward the end of his review, he mentions that if he had it to do all over again, he would not have selected the Maxscope. Suggest you go back and see if you can find this review. If you can't, let me know (private email) and I'll find it for you. So my question is, why do you want a Maxscope? Why the hell not?! Seriously, I'm looking for a dedicated solar telescope. It would be piggybacked on an SCT to provide both white light & H-alpha views for educational use. If you piggyback your solar scope on an SCT, it's NOT a dedicated solar scope. This was exactly my intention when I bought my Coronado last year...to piggyback it on my 10" LX200 and view the sun in both H-alpha and white light. So, I went and bought some pricy Losmandy rings, a white light filter and I was ready to go. The first time I used it was really nice, but the white light filter (particularly since you have an H-alpha mounted on the same scope) becomes boring. More importantly, it quickly becomes a _real_ pain to set up the LX200 so that you can view with a tiny solar scope...it's just not necessary. So I mounted the Pronto and Coronado on a CG5 and this is the way I use it today. I can set up the scope and start viewing in a snap. I have since sold the expensive rings and the white filter. Al |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Coronado Instruments Personal Solar Telescope | Edward | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | February 12th 04 11:26 AM |
Coronado Binomax? | Bruce Schupler | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | August 13th 03 12:53 AM |