Flowing space...

On May 6, 7:44 am, God Me@UpHere wrote:
oldcoot , wrote in
.com:





On May 6, 5:57 am, "Kadaitcha Man" wrote:
Phineas T Puddleduck Thou goodman
baldpate. Like the toad, ugly and venomous. Ye bawled:

Maxwell, in the case of EM.

BZZZZZZZAP.

Wrong.

Maxwell's equations *describe* propagation of E and H waves. They have
nothing to do with explaining the _cause_ of why the permeability/
permittivity values are what they are. Apparently duckwad is incapable
of grasping the distinction between *descriptions of effects* and
_explanations of cause_ . Too bad.

OK, take a shot at reciting the explanation of another of the half
dozen points of evidence by which the spatial medium _demonstrates
itself_ :

The fact that there is NO PERCEPTIBLE UPPER LIMIT TO AMPLITUDE OF EM
RADIATION demonstrates (multiple choice):

1. "Nothing"

2. It "just is" with no explanation needed.

3. Unlimited numbers of 'Magical Messengers', Sky Pixies, can be
called up on demand.

4. The _carrier medium_ possesses an energy density even greater than
the most energetic wave it carries.

5. Other. Fill in the blank__________________________ .

If DD does good, somebody repost it. Maybe we'll consider letting it
out of the 'kennel' on a probationary basis.. and consider going back
to that earlier question on gravity and tidal synchronization.
Duckwad's perhaps aware that the moon, in its tidally locked
condition, is actually an ovoid, elongated in the radial direction
away from Earth.. and the same elongation will occur under
FS model of gravity as under the standard model.
oc

As odd as it may seem to you, 3 is the correct answer.

HTH

--
I am The Great I Am.


Would God post to alt.fan.art-bell?

Double-A