Flowing space...

(Apologies if this is a duplicate. The first send via the DSL rig
apparently didn't go thru.)

(Painius) wrote, re. those who rejected the VSP
for FS-gravity:

....I *can't* be the only one. I would
hope to hear from others who have
shunned the VSP and are not afraid to
discuss it.

Huh? The "others" have been posted here many times along with their
prolific writings on this subject. And they all came from once having
been hardline VS'ers steeped in the "educational" process. But they rose
above the 'no medium' indoctrination and saw, independantly and without
collaboration, essentially the *same* causal mechanism of gravity.
Gads, it's wearisome posting those links again, but
Google is your friend. If interested, Google:

Tom Martin, gravity
Lew Paxton, gravity
Henry Warren, Big Bang, gravity
Jerry Shifman, gravity
Henry Lindner, gravity


And replying to the DDuck conjoinment Painius said,

The instruments to detect this energy
(the SPED) have yet to be invented.

Again, "huh?". The only required 'instrument' resides between one's
ears. It's simply the clear-headed observation of the *evidence* the
spatial medium demonstrates in spades:

1.) The high, fixed speed of light demonstrating a medium of a
particular energy-density(or PDT value) that fixes the
'permeability/permittivity' values of space.
2.) The fact that there's no perceptible upper limit to EM amplitude
demonstrates a *carrier medium* of even greater energy density than the
most energetic wave it carries.
3.) The ability to crush massive stars down to a BH demonstrates a
hyperpressurized state exceeding degeneracy pressure of the atomic
nucleus.
4.) The behavior of gravity demonstrates a pressure-driven, accelerating
flow into mass, with mass synonymous with flow sink.

In light of the above,

5.) The fact that we perceive space as 'void' demonstrates a
sub-Planckian wavelength-state or 'granularity' below our sensory and EM
resolution.

To perceive the glaringly obvious evidence, any need for
'instrumentation' is quite moot and redundant.

And to the DD conjoinment re. the Crookes radiometer imbroglio, Painius
said:

Will you please wake up... ?

And this was not intended to be evidence for the SPED, if you'll
please go back
and check that.

In the future, please strive harder to
keep up.

Comprehensional dysfunction. "This is your brain on drugs". Both members
of the DD conjoinment appear to suffer from it.

oc