Flowing Space 201 -- S.A.A.A.D.

Yes, it's saaad but true... we've become entangled in an
enormous traffic jam. Far ahead, the green light has just
come on, but we are still sitting here, just waiting for all the
cars in front of us to begin to move. It seems to take ages,
and by the time we get even close to the green light, ON
comes the amber light and then ON comes the red light.
Dammit!

The above is sort of a slow motion example of what some
have termed the "domino effect". One of its more profound
applications is with dominoes themselves. You may have
seen where someone has set dominoes together vertically
into a complex pattern. Then on cue, the first domino is
tripped into the second domino. The results can be very
impressive. The dominoes begin tripping each other into
the next, and this can go on for a minute or more.

Let's get disentangled from this domino effect, because it
may not be easy to see how it can explain SAAAD. What's
SAAAD? If you haven't guessed it already, we'll be coming
back to it in just a moment.

After Einstein published his ideas on relativity, he spent a
good deal of his time working to invalidate the other strong
physics theories which tried to explain the realities of the
world. While he spent most of this time defending his ideas
against the long-standing ether theories, he also recognized
quantum mechanics as a looming threat. He didn't see these
quantum ideas as in any way compatible with his relativity.

So he got together with two other scientists, notably Boris
Podolsky and Nathan Rosen, and worked to show that
quantum mechanics was invalid, or at the very least, that the
theory was incomplete. And they came up with something
that was eventually called the "EPR paradox" after the first
letters of their last names. They were able to show that, in
accordance with the principles of quantum mechanics,
subatomic particles could become linked and that a change
to one such particle would instantly be reflected in its
counterpart, even if separated by a universe.

This linking of one particle to another soon became known
as "entanglement,"--Einstein liked to call it "spooky action at
a distance". And i have acronymphed Einstein's view into
"SAAAD". This is believed by many scientists to be one of
the strangest of the strange properties of quantum mechanics...
perhaps even _the_ strangest!

And now, here is one of the *really* strange parts--

This SAAAD, this entanglement has been shown beyond
any shadow of doubt to actually take place just as Einstein
and his colleagues described in their EPR paradox!

Now, the mathematics of this, the empirical studies of this
which have taken place over the years since Einstein first
attacked quantum mechanics, these i will leave for the
reader as an in-depth study. For our purposes, suffice it
to say that entanglement can be seen as superbly strong
evidence that space is "something" rather than just a void
lacking any substance at all. If you are not yet convinced
of this, then you must ask yourself...

How can information be transferred *instantly* through
light years, parsecs, billions and billions of miles of nothing?
Doesn't it seem more likely that space is made of something
that is _so_ dense, the "domino effect" is instantaneous?

This seems to be, as i said, superbly strong evidence for an
extremely dense energy field perhaps on the order of
Nightbat's unequalized, non-uniform base energy field. This
field i have dubbed the PCD or the primary constructive
dynamic. This PCD gives rise to fluctuations of high-energy
particles of matter and antimatter, electrons and antielectrons
(positrons). These particles meet by the billions, explode in
tiny, undramatic fashion and spawn other dense, high-energy
fields at sub-Planck wavelengths.

The constant action of this PCD throughout the Universe gives
each cubic centimeter of space a tremendous energy-density,
and puts great pressure on all other surrounding areas of space.
Space is *so* dense with the PCD that it is able to transfer
information instantaneously across light years, even billions of
parsecs, in the manner which Albert Einstein first described so
many decades ago.

Einstein firmly believed that if SAAAD could be theorized to
happen, this *must* mean that quantum mechanics was, at the
very least, an incomplete picture of reality. He also seemed to
strongly feel that if SAAAD were ever proven to be true, this
would negate his relativity theory. And he appeared to feel the
same troubled way about ether theory as well.

Today it looks as though he was wrong about this. Rather than
negating relativity, quantum theory, along with its entanglement
(SAAAD) and its strong tendency toward showing that space
is "something" rather than "nothing," fills in the gaps of Einstein's
relativity so that _together_ these excellent, well-tested theories
give us a more complete picture of reality.

Wouldn't you agree?

If all this hasn't been enough to encourage your continued
study of flowing space, there is still more evidence for you to
consider...

hd&ssn
Paine
tbc