![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Giu, 19:24, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" wrote:
Dear cestblu: wrote in message ... ... concerning the universe extension is it possible to assume that the maximum distance between two points in the Universe is 3.14*13.7billion light years? No.http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html#DN Explanation: in the earth the max distance between 2 points (e.g. north pole and south pole) is one half the ring, i.e. 3.14*r (r=earth ray). In the universe speed material cannot exceed the light one, No.http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/co...gy_faq.html#MX so the universe cannot have an extension higher than it's age, There appears to be no direct correlation between size and age. always travelling to it's maximum speed... the light one... The local speed limit applies to kinetic motion. *The Big Bang was not an explosion, where stuff was blasted away from some center. *We can see in the direction we are moving away from, and there is no glowing core of some sort of explosion. What do you think about that? You are at least thinking, and that is always good. *You might want to read hehttp://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htm ... in four parts. David A. Smith Thanks. A Very good link for finding answers to common FAQ. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Superior limit to Universe extension | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 23 | June 30th 08 07:35 PM |
Venus at superior conjucntion - the anti-transit | Robert Welch | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | June 7th 08 12:39 AM |
these days, it doubts a smile too cognitive on to her superior book | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 29th 07 09:51 PM |
Nikon 10x42 SE (superior E) | Blue Sea | Amateur Astronomy | 34 | June 4th 04 05:53 AM |
Reaching Rayleigh Limit, Dawes Limit | edz | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 29th 03 04:55 PM |