![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 May 2004 17:46:20 +0100, Martin Frey
wrote: Pete Lawrence wrote: I know it's going to be subjective to describe it but... Is the contrast good? Can you get a picture? http://www.hadastro.org.uk/images/Pst040526-02.jpg Second attempt to post this - first one seems to have vanished. Held my little digital camera to the eyepiece and hoped. Not much control of this fairly automatic camera and no processing done beyond a slight crop. Thanks for posting this Martin. I'm envious - I haven't looked at the Sun through an H-Alpha filter since my University days. Can you tune these scopes? -- Pete Lawrence http://www.pbl33.co.uk Most recent images http://www.pbl33.fast24.co.uk/recent_images.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete Lawrence wrote:
Thanks for posting this Martin. I'm envious - I haven't looked at the Sun through an H-Alpha filter since my University days. Can you tune these scopes? Yes - there is a big knurled ring that does about half a turn: it seemed at first that you could either see surface detail or prominences depending on the tuning. I know think there is a mid point that shows 99% of what's to be seen from both. It doesn't begin to match the 90mm solarmax I looked through at Astrofest but it seems to be as good as any other 40mm - nothing cheap about it (not even the price - except it has halved the cost of entry level H-a) I did look longingly at the Canon 300D in Jessops window this morning... I feel a life of crime beckoning. PS my ****e neighbour was arrested this evening: cheaper and possibly even more pleasurable than getting a PST. -- Martin Frey http://www.hadastro.org.uk N 51 02 E 0 47 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 May 2004 01:36:37 +0100, Martin Frey
wrote: Yes - there is a big knurled ring that does about half a turn: it seemed at first that you could either see surface detail or prominences depending on the tuning. I know think there is a mid point that shows 99% of what's to be seen from both. It doesn't begin to match the 90mm solarmax I looked through at Astrofest but it seems to be as good as any other 40mm - nothing cheap about it (not even the price - except it has halved the cost of entry level H-a) The filter that I used at Uni many years ago was about 3" thick with multiple layers. Unfortunately, something had got into the filter and was 'growing' from the outside in. This left a tiny windows to observe through. Views were fantastic though. I did look longingly at the Canon 300D in Jessops window this morning... I feel a life of crime beckoning. Don't go all chap on me Martin - get a 10D ;-) PS my ****e neighbour was arrested this evening: cheaper and possibly even more pleasurable than getting a PST. Excellent result. Now go back to the authorities that threatened you for inciting neighbourly hatred and demand an apology. -- Pete Lawrence http://www.pbl33.co.uk Most recent images http://www.pbl33.fast24.co.uk/recent_images.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete Lawrence wrote:
Don't go all chap on me Martin - get a 10D ;-) You mean size does matter? PS my ****e neighbour was arrested this evening: cheaper and possibly even more pleasurable than getting a PST. Excellent result. Now go back to the authorities that threatened you for inciting neighbourly hatred and demand an apology. The apology I already had. What swung the arrest was the first decent result I've got from my from Mintron ccd camera. Up until last night it has been an expensive mistake - I can see quite faint objects through it but get no contrast so no detail. Anyway last night it copped a really clear view of the man driving his pickup truck straight into my neighbour's car. RESULT. So now I'm even quite pleased to have got the Mintron. Must try it on the PST but suspect the field of view will be tiny. -- Martin Frey http://www.hadastro.org.uk N 51 02 E 0 47 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 May 2004 10:09:06 +0100, Martin Frey
wrote: Don't go all chap on me Martin - get a 10D ;-) You mean size does matter? Only in a smallest wallet competition. The apology I already had. What swung the arrest was the first decent result I've got from my from Mintron ccd camera. Up until last night it has been an expensive mistake - I can see quite faint objects through it but get no contrast so no detail. Anyway last night it copped a really clear view of the man driving his pickup truck straight into my neighbour's car. RESULT. I've heard it all now. Perhaps youc could get it on www.SpaceWeather.com - "Comet NEAT behind out of control ramming neighbour". -- Pete Lawrence http://www.pbl33.co.uk Most recent images http://www.pbl33.fast24.co.uk/recent_images.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of the '5'then..... I phoned telescope house again, to be told
only 5 have come in and I am hoping another few come in before THE DATE. Try the processing tips for Halpha images in the July S&T, ought to improve your shots a bit more, then we can really see what we have. Can you tell us how much of the disc detail is visible, granulation and the dark filaments?? Were you using the included 12mm eyepiece? Do you think a bit more would be useful?? How small details are visible..... Darn, I ca't wait till I don't have to ask someone else about it. Yes - there is a big knurled ring that does about half a turn: it seemed at first that you could either see surface detail or prominences depending on the tuning. I know think there is a mid point that shows 99% of what's to be seen from both. It doesn't begin to match the 90mm solarmax I looked through at Astrofest but it seems to be as good as any other 40mm - nothing cheap about it (not even the price - except it has halved the cost of entry level H-a) I believe this is only to help with the double stacking, do the instructions help?? I did look longingly at the Canon 300D in Jessops window this morning... I feel a life of crime beckoning. 10D, my father has one, lovely bit of kit, everything else is not worth the hassle. Personally I want a 'full frame' digital SLR so I can do 'proper' ultra wideangle shots! Well done again on being on of the 'chosen few!' PEterW |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question for Coronado | Peter Woolliams | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | May 19th 04 03:06 AM |
Help! H-alpha Solar Observing: Coronado Maxscope 40 or SM40/10? | Craig Levine | Amateur Astronomy | 22 | April 21st 04 05:01 PM |
Mount for Coronado PST | Kilolani | Amateur Astronomy | 52 | April 11th 04 12:10 AM |
Coronado Solarmax 40 vs 60 | KC | Amateur Astronomy | 25 | February 24th 04 07:49 PM |