![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
In one of those moments of conceptual flux, I wondered if it would be feasible, using today's existing materials, to developp a zero-propellant orbital plane change capable satellite. (Emphasis on the word -propellant-, not -energy- ;-P) Considering that orbital plane change requires so much energy, in fact, in many cases more energy than relaunching the thing from the ground up again, I was considering combining two methods to achive a plane change with zero propellant usage. Consider a satellite with an electrodynamic tether and appropriate structural stiffness and materials to resist Very LEO passages thru the upper fringes of the atmosphere. Using it's solar panels as flaps, a la Mars Global Surveyor, it would aerobrake with a profile such that the resulting vector would be as perpendicular as possible to the orbit in a normal or antinormal fashion, changing the inclination a few tenths of degrees at a time, every 90 minutes... At apogee, the sat deploys an electromagnetic tether, and using power from it's solar panel, induces propulsion to raise the perigee back to the optimal altitude. My questions are, how long would a tether need to be to provide substantial propulsive capability, for "average" solar panel output. And what would be the optimal perigee, balancing the thermal and drag issue along with a reasonable plane change capability. At what point does one need to consider thermal cycling issues and integrating a TPS into the design? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The drag created by tethers can also be used for braking/ deorbiting... in
fact, I seem to recall Boeing or TRW looking into making them standard equipment for de-orbiting without relying on chemical motors or fuel. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MSNBC (JimO) - Hubble debate -- a lot of sound and fury | JimO | Space Shuttle | 148 | April 28th 04 06:39 PM |
An UltraLight plane on Mars? | A Canuck | Technology | 9 | November 10th 03 11:07 PM |
Three aerospace innovators Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Orbital Sciences Combine strengths to design and build NASA's Orbital Space Plane | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 1 | October 15th 03 12:21 AM |
Three aerospace innovators Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Orbital Sciences Combine strengths to design and build NASA's Orbital Space Plane | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | October 14th 03 03:31 PM |
Columbia Investigator Worried NASA Won't Change Culture, Allowing'Faulty Reasoning' to Prevail | Steven D. Litvintchouk | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 3rd 03 06:41 PM |