![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jay wrote: From the article at: http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20030801_1116.html Fears NASA Won't Change Columbia Investigator Worried NASA Won't Change Culture, Allowing 'Faulty Reasoning' to Prevail The Associated Press CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. Aug. 1 A Nobel Prize-winning member of the board investigating the space shuttle Columbia disaster says he fears NASA won't change its culture, possibly leading to yet another accident. The "same faulty reasoning" that led to the 1986 Challenger accident also led to Columbia, said Douglas Osheroff, one of the 13 board members wrapping up the report on the Columbia accident. Trying to "change the culture" at NASA w.r.t. the space shuttle is like trying to "change the culture" at the highest levels of management at the big tobacco companies w.r.t. cigarettes. Sorry. You cannot adopt a culture that puts the users and customers first when you're in the business of selling an inherently highly risky product that you're afraid will lose business if it was widely known just how risky it is. With each catastrophic accident, NASA is forced to reassure us that it will never happen again (whether they know how to accomplish that or not), because who is going to volunteer to ride on a vehicle if they thought they still had a 2% chance of getting killed? Osheroff worries that NASA's new task force that will assess when shuttles can return to space may feel pressure to hurry because of the needs of the international space station. That's the problem. That's the fundamental disconnect that NASA has been faced with ever since they declared the shuttle operational back in the 1980's. It should be clear by now that flying the shuttle will never be anything close to routine. Yet they keep pretending it's some kind of routine space truck, with civilian passengers and a schedule of needed flights to supply the Space Station that NASA has to keep trying to adhere to. NASA should be given total schedule freedom. That is, the schedule of flights to the Space Station should be scrapped, and a whole series of test flights of the shuttle should be done to "wring it out." For example, let's finally try one of the abort modes for real (rather than just in simulators), and let's see if it really works. -- Steven D. Litvintchouk Email: Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OPINION (Oberg): "Post-Columbia NASA hunkers down" | James Oberg | Space Shuttle | 56 | August 6th 03 09:31 AM |
NASA and "Oil" Culture burned Cops + Astronauts to death | inventor84 | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 2nd 03 11:41 PM |
Columbia Investigator Worried NASA Won't Change Culture, Allowing 'Faulty Reasoning' to Prevail | Brian Gaff | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 2nd 03 10:51 AM |
Risks | Hallerb | Space Shuttle | 38 | July 26th 03 01:57 AM |
NASA: Gases Breached Wing of Shuttle Atlantis in 2000 | Rusty Barton | Space Shuttle | 2 | July 10th 03 01:27 AM |