![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zoltan Szakaly wrote:
When I looked at the video of how they simulated the foam block colliding with the reinforced carbon carbon leading edge of the shuttle, I noticed that behind the leading edge (which is a thin sheet of RCC) there was nothing. Isn't this highly irresponsible, in other words stupid? Any homebuilder of kit airplanes knows that filling the cavity with foam would greatly enhance the strength of the leading edge without increasing the weight of the structure significantly. The carbon fibers comprising the composite sheet are strong in tension/compression but can be bent and broken. This lack of support from the inside was the direct cause of the hole that the foam block punched in it. RCC doesn't get hot during reentry. It gets very, very hot. It will instantly char practically anything in contact with it. What is in contact with it will conduct heat into the wing, in addition to adding mass. -- http://inquisitor.i.am/ | | Ian Stirling. ---------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------- Two parrots sitting on a perch. One asks the other, "Can you smell fish?" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cavity behind the RCC leading edge | Zoltan Szakaly | Space Shuttle | 51 | November 7th 03 06:28 PM |
Is a shuttle still flyable with a hole in the leading edge like the test piece? | JazzMan | Space Shuttle | 4 | September 1st 03 01:00 AM |
Protecting the leading edge | Doug Whitehall | Space Shuttle | 4 | August 1st 03 01:29 PM |
The Final Test: Now That's More Like It! | Richard Schumacher | Space Shuttle | 66 | July 15th 03 01:08 AM |
Good Article by Allan Shapiro about RCC and Leading Edge Failure | cndc | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 7th 03 07:00 PM |