![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I looked at the video of how they simulated the foam block
colliding with the reinforced carbon carbon leading edge of the shuttle, I noticed that behind the leading edge (which is a thin sheet of RCC) there was nothing. Isn't this highly irresponsible, in other words stupid? Any homebuilder of kit airplanes knows that filling the cavity with foam would greatly enhance the strength of the leading edge without increasing the weight of the structure. The carbon fibers comprising the composite sheet are strong in tension/compression but can be bent. This lack of support from the inside was the direct cause of the hole that the foam block punched in it. Zoltan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Von Braun rockets on Encyclopedia Astronautica | Pat Flannery | Space Science Misc | 41 | November 11th 03 08:10 AM |
Cutting edge invention/technology website | Slickwater | Space Shuttle | 2 | August 13th 03 08:50 PM |
Protecting the leading edge | Doug Whitehall | Space Shuttle | 4 | August 1st 03 01:29 PM |
The Final Test: Now That's More Like It! | Richard Schumacher | Space Shuttle | 66 | July 15th 03 01:08 AM |
Good Article by Allan Shapiro about RCC and Leading Edge Failure | cndc | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 7th 03 07:00 PM |