A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » UK Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

BBC4 Light - the most annoying programme ever?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 8th 04, 10:10 PM
Martin Frey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default BBC4 Light - the most annoying programme ever?

Well may be not - but bloody close. Such casual inaccuracy was
astounding.

-----------------------------
Martin Frey
http://www.hadastro.org.uk
N 51 01 52.2 E 0 47 21.1
-----------------------------
  #2  
Old December 8th 04, 10:11 PM
Fleetie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Martin Frey" wrote
Well may be not - but bloody close. Such casual inaccuracy was
astounding.


Never mind, eh? Most of the people on this group CERTAINLY COULD
learn a lot from the programme that is following it, and on right
now.


Martin
--
M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890
Manchester, U.K. http://www.fleetie.demon.co.uk


  #3  
Old December 8th 04, 10:48 PM
Martin Frey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Fleetie" wrote:

"Martin Frey" wrote
Well may be not - but bloody close. Such casual inaccuracy was
astounding.


Never mind, eh? Most of the people on this group CERTAINLY COULD
learn a lot from the programme that is following it, and on right
now.


But luckily neither you nor I are watching it as we sit at out
computers preferring mispelled badly punctated rants...

-----------------------------
Martin Frey
http://www.hadastro.org.uk
N 51 01 52.2 E 0 47 21.1
-----------------------------
  #4  
Old December 8th 04, 10:52 PM
Fleetie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Martin Frey" wrote
"Fleetie" wrote:

"Martin Frey" wrote
Well may be not - but bloody close. Such casual inaccuracy was
astounding.


Never mind, eh? Most of the people on this group CERTAINLY COULD
learn a lot from the programme that is following it, and on right
now.


But luckily neither you nor I are watching it as we sit at out
computers preferring mispelled badly punctated rants...


Well, you might think so, but in fact I watched all of it, though
admittedly and evidently, I did also type that message while it was on.


Martin
--
M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890
Manchester, U.K. http://www.fleetie.demon.co.uk


  #5  
Old December 8th 04, 11:01 PM
Jonathan Silverlight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Martin Frey
writes
"Fleetie" wrote:

"Martin Frey" wrote
Well may be not - but bloody close. Such casual inaccuracy was
astounding.


Never mind, eh? Most of the people on this group CERTAINLY COULD
learn a lot from the programme that is following it, and on right
now.


But luckily neither you nor I are watching it as we sit at out
computers preferring mispelled badly punctated rants...


And even the cleverest spell checker can't catch a typo that's spelled
correctly :-)
  #6  
Old December 8th 04, 11:25 PM
Fleetie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And even the cleverest spell checker can't catch a typo that's spelled correctly :-)

Arf arf!

No, typos are forgivable in my opinion.

It's ok to be cack-handed. It's not ok to be **** at your own language. It's
even worse to be know it but not care!

(Here comes the flak! Incoming!)


Martin
--
M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890
Manchester, U.K. http://www.fleetie.demon.co.uk


  #7  
Old December 9th 04, 01:19 AM
Tim Auton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Fleetie" wrote:

It's ok to be cack-handed. It's not ok to be **** at your own language. It's
even worse to be know it but not care!


lol thats so true its not funny lol i think the yoof these days r 2
much txting so they r 2 **** at words 2 no wot is k lol


Timlol
--
This is not my signature.
  #8  
Old December 9th 04, 04:55 AM
gp.skinner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

But luckily neither you nor I are watching it as we sit at out
computers preferring mispelled badly punctated rants...


You want to puncture rats?

Anyone with a synopsis of the programme, I missed it.

Graeme



  #9  
Old December 9th 04, 09:12 AM
Martin Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Martin Frey wrote:

Well may be not - but bloody close. Such casual inaccuracy was
astounding.


Considering that last weeks wasn't too bad. This one was dreadful.

Regards,
Martin Brown
  #10  
Old December 9th 04, 09:14 AM
Martin Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

gp.skinner wrote:

But luckily neither you nor I are watching it as we sit at out
computers preferring mispelled badly punctated rants...


You want to puncture rats?

Anyone with a synopsis of the programme, I missed it.


"Changing History" would be a fair synopsis. You didn't miss much.

Regards,
Martin Brown
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Light year distance question Tony Sims Technology 7 April 29th 05 04:41 PM
All technology outdated betalimit Policy 0 September 20th 04 03:41 PM
NASA Test of Light Speed Extrapolation ralph sansbury Astronomy Misc 26 February 12th 04 02:29 PM
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (Long Text) Kazmer Ujvarosy UK Astronomy 3 December 25th 03 10:41 PM
ancient planet found PCportinc Misc 27 August 4th 03 06:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.