![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've discovered that the main problem with XT10 collimation is alignment of
the secondary mirror. With the laser collimator in place, I lightly tapped on the spider vanes and watched in dismay as the red dot walked its way out of the center dot on the primary and _half way_ across the 5" radius!!! I want a new secondary holder (waahhh!). -- -Stephen Paul |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With the laser collimator in place, I lightly tapped
on the spider vanes and watched in dismay as the red dot walked its way out of the center dot on the primary and _half way_ across the 5" radius!!! I want a new secondary holder (waahhh!). -- -Stephen Paul Which XT-10 secondary support do you have, the newer 4 vane or the older 3 rod support? I find my XT-8 with the 3 rod support is quite sensitive and normally needs repositioning before viewing, however it does seem to stay in place during the evening. My OPT Starhunter 10 has the newer 4 vane support and I have found it to be very stable. I took it on a 2000+ mile trip across the southwest, taking it in and out of the motorhome every night, banging it around and it never needed recollimation. I think the problem with those rod supports on the older scopes is that the secondary holder can easily rotate about one of the rods and the other two rods can switch modes. This is similar to a bicycle wheel, the secondary being the hub. But bicycle wheels stablize the end to end rotation of the hub by having spokes at each end of the hub, not just one set in the center. This is really the flaw in the rod design. I think my making sure everything is tensioned and all jam nuts tight, one can improve the stiffness. Best wishes jon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jon Isaacs" wrote in message
... With the laser collimator in place, I lightly tapped on the spider vanes and watched in dismay as the red dot walked its way out of the center dot on the primary and _half way_ across the 5" radius!!! Which XT-10 secondary support do you have, the newer 4 vane or the older 3 rod support? I find my XT-8 with the 3 rod support is quite sensitive and normally needs repositioning before viewing, however it does seem to stay in place during the evening. Yep. It's the GS model, which has the rods. I'm just glad I finally figured this out. As may be evidenced in the saa archives, I've been a little frustrated with collimation on this scope a couple of times. (I don't mind tweaking the primary however many times it takes duringa session, but futzing with the secondary is just too time consuming). I think my making sure everything is tensioned and all jam nuts tight, one can improve the stiffness. Thanks for the support and advice. I have to admit that I loosened all of this up once a long time ago to understand shifting the secondary. Serves me right. ;-) -Stephen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Last secondary payload on a comemrcial launch? | MattWriter | Policy | 2 | August 10th 04 03:25 PM |
Secondary mirror on a 10" f/5 | vL | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | September 27th 03 04:40 PM |
Protostar / Antares Secondary? | Joseph O'Neil | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | August 26th 03 05:11 PM |
12" Newtonian with 6% secondary | optidud | Amateur Astronomy | 57 | August 8th 03 07:48 AM |
Secondary size & CCD imaging | Rod Mollise | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | July 29th 03 02:12 PM |