![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 12:32:36 GMT, "Stephen Sherrod"
wrote: For awhile, it seemed that Protostar was the best game in town for a good, commercial secondary. Now, Antares Optics advertises a secondary with 1/xx wave flatness for also high $. Since I know zip about optical surfaces, can anyone out there tell from their websites (if the stats are correct) which company seems to provide the "best" secondary under 2.0 inches?? Thanks in advance. The enchanced secondaries form Antaries are very good (I sell them), but the bery best, IMO, are the quartz form protoStar - and i do NOT sell those. So ther eyou ahve it fomr a delaer who sells Antares - they are good, but I think the ProtoStars are the "kick butt" version fo secondaries. ![]() joe http://www.oneilphoto.on.ca |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moon hoax as American as apple pie | Jay Windley | History | 43 | February 14th 05 09:37 PM |
Last secondary payload on a comemrcial launch? | MattWriter | Policy | 2 | August 10th 04 03:25 PM |
Protostar Mirrors | Bill Nunnelee | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 17th 03 07:33 PM |
12" Newtonian with 6% secondary | optidud | Amateur Astronomy | 57 | August 8th 03 07:48 AM |
Secondary size & CCD imaging | Rod Mollise | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | July 29th 03 02:12 PM |