A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Obama's plans even wackier than those of Bush



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 24th 10, 03:29 PM posted to sci.space.policy
William Mook[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,840
Default Obama's plans even wackier than those of Bush

Brad, you must be a fan of psychobilly musician, Mojo Nixon. I was
on a road trip recently and had the opportunity to listen to Nixon's
radio show on Sirius Lying c**cksuckers.

On the show Mojo Nixon recounted an imaginary tale where the new
President has his first meeting - not on the schedule. Something of a
personal nature organized by his security detail. Not yet familiar
with the traditions of his offce, he agrees to attend, thinking he
would receive some sort of personal honor from the security folks.
He's ushered into the situation room by the officer of the day and is
surprised to see the head of security who introduces him to other
attendees. At the meeting are a surprising array of notable
industrialists and wealthy individuals with somber serious looks on
their faces. He notices that contrary to Federal Law, they are
smoking cigars in a public space. He is asked by head of security if
he'd like to light one up. The President stands behind his usual
chair not taking a seat declines. The President irritated by being
uninformed about this meeting seeing that its likely far more
important than just a traditional greeting by security, asks, how can
I help you gentlemen? Not a word is said. In response the lights go
down as a projection screen comes down from the ceiling and an ancient
16 mm projector flashes into noisy life. Its a silent film, of the
shooting of JFK, taken from an angle not seen before, which clearly
shows shooters on the grassy knoll. One of the plasma screens on the
wall beyond the projection screen comes to life showing the details of
the person who made the film in '63 and how they died a few months
later and the details of how that death was arranged and covered up.
At the same time a TOP SECRET folder is placed in front of the
President for him to review with more details of the operation.
Another silent 16 mm film is spliced to the first, showing the scene
again from a different angle. Another Texan's face appears on another
plasma screen alongside the first. Another TOP SECRET file detailing
termination procedures of that citizen is tossed on the growing stack
with a sharp smack. Through it all, not a word is said. Another film
clip this time showing men moving from the grassy knoll and putting
their weapons away pointing at the camera. In all seven film clips,
seven citizens and three family members associated with them, one only
five years old, who's only crime was being at the wrong place at the
wrong time - mothers, fathers, sons and daughters - decent people all
- destroyed to keep these films and this operation secret.

The ancient film projector stops and there is total silence in the
room. The lamp darkens and with it the plasma screens darken also.
The lights are brought up. The President standing behind his seat at
the table looks at the TOP SECRET folders and quietly takes his seat
and places his hand softly atop the stack. The security director
smiles and says, any questions? The President looks at the group of
powerful individuals. All white he notices. He decides he has
nothing to say to these peopl and absently pulls a hard pack of
Marlboro Reds out of his pocket and lights one up, looking away. His
chief of security is standing over him smiling inanely. Any
questions? he repeats. The President takes a draw on his cigarette
waiting. The security officer of the day clears his throat. Mr.
President, I believe you may have dropped this when you got your
cigarettes. The officer sets a single typewritten page in front of
the President. What's this? the President asks. The officer
replies, I think its an agenda of some sort sir. An industrialist at
the opposite end of the table takes a draw on his expensive cigar
leans forward and says, I believe she is right Mr. President. Its the
major points of your agenda for the next four years. I see, the
President says, and he is escorted out of his own situation room
because there is a private meeting scheduled among industrialists - to
discuss strategy not involving the government.

Now, how realistic do you think this dramatic story is? Not very!
Such confrontation would break most of us - granted. I don't think it
would break someone who made it to the Presidency. In fact, it would
be pointless and stupid. A President would do something - heroic - to
break out of this situation - and mostly - they'd want to kick the
asses of the people who tried to do this sort of ****. And they would
have the resources to succeed.

The big argument Brad is do industrial interests trump intelligence
interests? I think domestic and foreign intelligence does worry a lot
about **** most of us don't worry about - because they're charged with
that task. They're there to protect the USA and the world where
possible, from nuclear annihilation. This is a worthy goal on the
face of it. They were given absolute power in the 1950s by Truman and
Eisenhower working together. Against this power the power of
industrial interests is as nothing.


  #2  
Old April 24th 10, 08:06 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Obama's plans even wackier than those of Bush

On Apr 24, 7:29*am, William Mook wrote:
Brad, you must be a fan of psychobilly musician, Mojo Nixon. * I was
on a road trip recently and had the opportunity to listen to Nixon's
radio show on Sirius Lying c**cksuckers.

On the show Mojo Nixon recounted an imaginary tale where the new
President has his first meeting - not on the schedule. *Something of a
personal nature organized by his security detail. *Not yet familiar
with the traditions of his offce, he agrees to attend, thinking he
would receive some sort of personal honor from the security folks.
He's ushered into the situation room by the officer of the day and is
surprised to see the head of security who introduces him to other
attendees. *At the meeting are a surprising array of notable
industrialists and wealthy individuals with somber serious looks on
their faces. *He notices that contrary to Federal Law, they are
smoking cigars in a public space. *He is asked by head of security if
he'd like to light one up. *The President stands behind his usual
chair not taking a seat declines. *The President irritated by being
uninformed about this meeting seeing that its likely far more
important than just a traditional greeting by security, asks, how can
I help you gentlemen? *Not a word is said. *In response the lights go
down as a projection screen comes down from the ceiling and an ancient
16 mm projector flashes into noisy life. *Its a silent film, of the
shooting of JFK, taken from an angle not seen before, which clearly
shows shooters on the grassy knoll. *One of the plasma screens on the
wall beyond the projection screen comes to life showing the details of
the person who made the film in '63 and how they died a few months
later and the details of how that death was arranged and covered up.
At the same time a TOP SECRET folder is placed in front of the
President for him to review with more details of the operation.
Another silent 16 mm film is spliced to the first, showing the scene
again from a different angle. *Another Texan's face appears on another
plasma screen alongside the first. *Another TOP SECRET file detailing
termination procedures of that citizen is tossed on the growing stack
with a sharp smack. *Through it all, not a word is said. *Another film
clip this time showing men moving from the grassy knoll and putting
their weapons away pointing at the camera. *In all seven film clips,
seven citizens and three family members associated with them, one only
five years old, who's only crime was being at the wrong place at the
wrong time - mothers, fathers, sons and daughters - decent people all
- destroyed to keep these films and this operation secret.

The ancient film projector stops and there is total silence in the
room. *The lamp darkens and with it the plasma screens darken also.
The lights are brought up. *The President standing behind his seat at
the table looks at the TOP SECRET folders and quietly takes his seat
and places his hand softly atop the stack. *The security director
smiles and says, any questions? *The President looks at the group of
powerful individuals. *All white he notices. *He decides he has
nothing to say to these peopl *and absently pulls a hard pack of
Marlboro Reds out of his pocket and lights one up, looking away. *His
chief of security is standing over him smiling inanely. *Any
questions? *he repeats. *The President takes a draw on his cigarette
waiting. *The security officer of the day clears his throat. *Mr.
President, I believe you may have dropped this when you got your
cigarettes. *The officer sets a single typewritten page in front of
the President. * What's this? *the President asks. *The officer
replies, I think its an agenda of some sort sir. *An industrialist at
the opposite end of the table takes a draw on his expensive cigar
leans forward and says, I believe she is right Mr. President. *Its the
major points of your agenda for the next four years. *I see, the
President says, and he is escorted out of his own situation room
because there is a private meeting scheduled among industrialists - to
discuss strategy not involving the government.

Now, how realistic do you think this dramatic story is? *Not very!
Such confrontation would break most of us - granted. I don't think it
would break someone who made it to the Presidency. * In fact, it would
be pointless and stupid. *A President would do something - heroic - to
break out of this situation - and mostly - they'd want to kick the
asses of the people who tried to do this sort of ****. *And they would
have the resources to succeed.

The big argument Brad is do industrial interests trump intelligence
interests? *I think domestic and foreign intelligence does worry a lot
about **** most of us don't worry about - because they're charged with
that task. *They're there to protect the USA and the world where
possible, from nuclear annihilation. *This is a worthy goal on the
face of it. *They were given absolute power in the 1950s by Truman and
Eisenhower working together. *Against this power the power of
industrial interests is as nothing.


Do you think Henry Kissinger just came to visit GW Bush and his
sidekick, in order to tell funny stories and to play that game of "pin
the tail on the donkey"?

Do you really think suppressing global access to Iraq’s vast flow of
cheap oil had nothing to do with that administration’s highly
questionable era of war actions?

Do you think there are no other faith-based and/or social-political
special interest groups putting their foot down, along with a loaded
gun to the heads of anyone getting in their way?

I'm not saying that everyone in politics is a bad guy or nasty gal,
nor am I saying that nothing good ever comes out of our government and
its skewed form of democracy that makes it next to impossible for Mook
Energy as well as for anyone else that's capable of improving the
future, as well as revising history or otherwise suggesting we've been
entirely snookered all along by those in charge. Most Americans just
want to believe that our government has always been honest and thus
truthful.

All I'm ever saying is that the few in charge have their loyal army of
mostly public funded brown-nosed parrots and minions that'll do
whatever it takes in order to please their boss (not necessarily the
president). JFK was simply too much of a mainstream threat,
especially to those Jewish sectors and their collaborative non-Jewish
groups that made life for most of us into a spendy living hell for
anyone that was interpreted as being a nonconformist or the least bit
anti-Semitic. Any form of revisionism, no matters how truthful, is
simply considered as anti-Semitic, even if it has nothing whatsoever
to do with Zionists/Jews, because it reflects badly on the truth-
worthiness or trustworthiness of our government and those of their Big
Energy puppet masters.

Monsanto is another good example of how those Rothschilds indirectly
hold onto our private parts, and squeeze. Other trillionaires of
corporate, banking, insurance and investment avenues are equally
saturated with those having their own special insider rules, and
seldom if ever policing their own kind. The very last thing they need
is another JFK, and the last thing we need is another assassinated
president.

~ BG
  #3  
Old April 25th 10, 09:36 PM posted to sci.space.policy
William Mook[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,840
Default Obama's plans even wackier than those of Bush

I think your comments regarding a Jewish cabal running our government
proves you're not right in the head, Brad. That's my opinion.

Fact is, there has been domestic intelligence and domestic operations
since revolutionary times to promote self government in the Americas
that gave Royalist sympathizers headaches then. These were not Jewish
at all. This effort to narrow the range of political discourse became
more formalized at the end of the Civil War with the creation of the
Secret Service, which is organized to protect the Republic and the
Office of the President not the person of the President. Throughout
this period you see popular people with strong opinions opposing the
Status Quo people like Joseph Smith Jr., Huey Long, Martin Luther King
marginalized and murdered. Smith and Long when they announced running
for President. King when he opposed an unpopular war and attempted to
organize a highly publicized march on Washington DC. Folks important
to the nation but with disruptive political ideas like Henry Ford are
merely marginalized. To my mind the proof of a conspiracy surrounding
JFK wasn't anything related to the death of JFK, but to the death of
RFK and the timing and nature of the marginalizing of Teddy Kennedy.

After the Civil War it seems that the range of political discourse was
limited to those issues that would not divide America greatly, with a
focus on labor movements and the containment of populist movements
that attempted to appeal to the newly emerging population of workers
coming to the cities from the farms. This naturally evolved later
into anti-communist efforts. After the development of nuclear weapons
control of the WMDs and the ability to project them into America
became paramount. Truman and Eisenhower reorganized the War
Department and Intelligence Services into DOD and CIA along with NSA.
We have today's network of State sponsored controls.
  #4  
Old April 26th 10, 12:27 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Obama's plans even wackier than those of Bush

On Apr 25, 1:36*pm, William Mook wrote:
I think your comments regarding a Jewish cabal running our government
proves you're not right in the head, Brad. *That's my opinion.

Your opinion is noted, as is your unwillingness to assign any faith-
based responsibility whatsoever, outside of Muslims which you perceive
as always bad and apparently responsible for the vast majority of
global problems.


Fact is, there has been domestic intelligence and domestic operations
since revolutionary times to promote self government in the Americas
that gave Royalist sympathizers headaches then. *These were not Jewish
at all.

I've never excluded other faith-based cables from having accomplished
their own levels of social/political and corporate debauchery. It
just seems as of lately the vast majority of the truly bad guys as
having profited the most at the trauma and demise of others have been
Jewish, and/or of those 100% pro-Jewish (let us use our kosher
approved SEC for some of that) regardless of the consequences for the
rest of us.

*This effort to narrow the range of political discourse became
more formalized at the end of the Civil War with the creation of the
Secret Service, which is organized to protect the Republic and the
Office of the President not the person of the President. *Throughout
this period you see popular people with strong opinions opposing the
Status Quo people like Joseph Smith Jr., Huey Long, Martin Luther King
marginalized and murdered. *Smith and Long when they announced running
for President. *King when he opposed an unpopular war and attempted to
organize a highly publicized march on Washington DC. *Folks important
to the nation but with disruptive political ideas like Henry Ford are
merely marginalized. *To my mind the proof of a conspiracy surrounding
JFK wasn't anything related to the death of JFK, but to the death of
RFK and the timing and nature of the marginalizing of Teddy Kennedy.

After the Civil War it seems that the range of political discourse was
limited to those issues that would not divide America greatly, with a
focus on labor movements and the containment of populist movements
that attempted to appeal to the newly emerging population of workers
coming to the cities from the farms. *This naturally evolved later
into anti-communist efforts. *After the development of nuclear weapons
control of the WMDs and the ability to project them into America
became paramount. *Truman and Eisenhower reorganized the War
Department and Intelligence Services into DOD and CIA along with NSA.
We have today's network of State sponsored controls.


And we've pretty much lost our oversight controls or even proper
independent review over each of them, having added agency upon agency
and otherwise created special forces plus black ops (often outsourced
and/or contracted in order to suit whatever bogus or false flag agenda
needs attention) that get to do and get away with pretty much whatever
they like. Our NASA us hardly a shining example of how best to
utilize our public funded expertise and technology, whereas the only
motivation I see in our NASA is butt-covering along with job and
benefit security hording.

Are you now suggesting that William Mook couldn't have done any
better?

~ BG
  #5  
Old April 26th 10, 04:15 AM posted to sci.space.policy
William Mook[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,840
Default Obama's plans even wackier than those of Bush

SINGLE STAGE TO ORBIT

External Tank Derived Heavy Lift Launcher (ETDHLL) is 50.8 meters long
and 8.4 meters in diameter. It masses 26.5 metric tons of structure
and carried 760.0 metric tons of propellant (629.24 MT LOX, 106.26 MT
LH2) The vehicle is equipped with an aerospike engine built around
three RS-68 pump sets with a total mass of 19.8 metric tons and
producing 1,031.4 metric tons of thrust with an Isp of 468 seconds.
It carries 50 metric tons of payload (double that of the Space
Shuttle) in an stretched inter-tank region that is 8.4 meters in
diameter and 10.8 meters in length (twice the volume of the space
shuttle) There is also 20.2 metric tons of added thermal protection
and fold-away wings to allow the empty stage to operate as a glider.
The system is fully reusable 2,000 times.

TWO ELEMENT TWO STAGE TO ORBIT

Equipped with Cross Feed a two element two stage system is made. The
booster element feeds propellant to the orbiter element at lift off.
This vehicle carries 157.2 metric tons to orbit in a 33.9 meter long
inter-tank region in the orbiter. Thus, the booster element is
73.9 meters long while the booster element is 46.9 meters long. The
system is fully reusable 2,000 times.

THREE ELEMENT TWO STAGE TO ORBIT

Two outboard booster elements feed propellant to a central stage at
lift off. The booster elements are 46.9 meters long while the orbiter
element is 101.7 meters long. The vehicle carries 253.9 metric tons
payload.

SEVEN ELEMENT THREE STAGE TO ORBIT

A central element operating as a third stage is fed at launch by two
outboard elements forming a second stage. Each of the second stage
outboard elements are each fed by two additional outboard elements
creating a first stage. The four first stage elements are drained
first, the two second stage elements are drained next. These six
booster elements are each 46.9 meters long while the orbiter element
is 186.8 meters long. The vehicle carries 648 metric tons to
orbit.

MISSIONS

SINGLE LAUNCH MARS ROUND TRIP

The 648 metric ton element , 41 meters long, carries 6.1 metric tons
to Mars surface and back, reusing the spacecraft.

DUAL LAUNCH MOON ROUND TRIP

The 648 metric ton element, 41 meters long system transfers 583.6 tons
of propellant to the two element two stage launcher orbiter on orbit.
The orbiter carries 105.5 tons to the moon and back returning the
spacecraft.

DUAL LAUNCH MARS ROUND TRIP WITH IN-SITU REFUELING

The 648 metric ton element, 41 meters long system transfers 583.6 tons
of propellant to the three element two stage launcher‘s orbiter
carrying 253.9 metric tons of payload. The vehicle lands 253.9 metric
tons on Mars’ surface. Once there, 583.6 tons of propellant is made
on Mars surface from local water supplies and solar energy. 156.4
metric tons of payload is left permanently on the surface of Mars
while 97.5 metric tons of payload is returned to Earth, along with the
vehicle, which may be reused 2,000x.




  #6  
Old April 26th 10, 05:30 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Obama's plans even wackier than those of Bush

On Apr 25, 8:15*pm, William Mook wrote:
SINGLE STAGE TO ORBIT

External Tank Derived Heavy Lift Launcher (ETDHLL) is 50.8 meters long
and 8.4 meters in diameter. *It masses 26.5 metric tons of structure
and carried 760.0 metric tons of propellant (629.24 MT LOX, 106.26 MT
LH2) *The vehicle is equipped with an aerospike engine built around
three RS-68 pump sets with a total mass of 19.8 metric tons and
producing 1,031.4 metric tons of thrust with an Isp of 468 seconds.
It carries 50 metric tons of payload (double that of the Space
Shuttle) in an stretched inter-tank region that is 8.4 meters in
diameter and 10.8 meters in length (twice the volume of the space
shuttle) * There is also 20.2 metric tons of added thermal protection
and fold-away wings to allow the empty stage to operate as a glider.
The system is fully reusable 2,000 times.

TWO ELEMENT TWO STAGE TO ORBIT

Equipped with Cross Feed a two element two stage system is made. *The
booster element feeds propellant to the orbiter element at lift off.
This vehicle carries 157.2 metric tons to orbit in a 33.9 meter long
inter-tank region in the orbiter. * * *Thus, the booster element is
73.9 meters long while the booster element is 46.9 meters long. *The
system is fully reusable 2,000 times.

THREE ELEMENT TWO STAGE TO ORBIT

Two outboard booster elements feed propellant to a central stage at
lift off. *The booster elements are 46.9 meters long while the orbiter
element is 101.7 meters long. *The vehicle carries 253.9 metric tons
payload.

SEVEN ELEMENT THREE STAGE TO ORBIT

A central element operating as a third stage is fed at launch by two
outboard elements forming a second stage. *Each of the second stage
outboard elements are each fed by two additional outboard elements
creating a first stage. *The four first stage elements are drained
first, the two second stage elements are drained next. *These six
booster elements are each 46.9 meters long while the orbiter element
is *186.8 meters long. *The vehicle carries 648 metric tons to
orbit.

MISSIONS

SINGLE LAUNCH MARS ROUND TRIP

The 648 metric ton element , 41 meters long, carries 6.1 metric tons
to Mars surface and back, reusing the spacecraft.

DUAL LAUNCH MOON ROUND TRIP

The 648 metric ton element, 41 meters long system transfers 583.6 tons
of propellant to the two element two stage launcher orbiter on orbit.
The orbiter carries 105.5 tons to the moon and back returning the
spacecraft.

DUAL LAUNCH MARS ROUND TRIP WITH IN-SITU REFUELING

The 648 metric ton element, 41 meters long system transfers 583.6 tons
of propellant to the three element two stage launcher‘s orbiter
carrying 253.9 metric tons of payload. *The vehicle lands 253.9 metric
tons on Mars’ surface. *Once there, 583.6 tons of propellant is made
on Mars surface from local water supplies and solar energy. *156.4
metric tons of payload is left permanently on the surface of Mars
while 97.5 metric tons of payload is returned to Earth, along with the
vehicle, which may be reused 2,000x.


Once you are in charge of our NASA or its replacement, what are you
going to do with Fred J. McCall and others of his kind?

~ BG
  #7  
Old April 26th 10, 04:56 PM posted to sci.space.policy
William Mook[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,840
Default Obama's plans even wackier than those of Bush

On Apr 26, 12:30*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Apr 25, 8:15*pm, William Mook wrote:



SINGLE STAGE TO ORBIT


External Tank Derived Heavy Lift Launcher (ETDHLL) is 50.8 meters long
and 8.4 meters in diameter. *It masses 26.5 metric tons of structure
and carried 760.0 metric tons of propellant (629.24 MT LOX, 106.26 MT
LH2) *The vehicle is equipped with an aerospike engine built around
three RS-68 pump sets with a total mass of 19.8 metric tons and
producing 1,031.4 metric tons of thrust with an Isp of 468 seconds.
It carries 50 metric tons of payload (double that of the Space
Shuttle) in an stretched inter-tank region that is 8.4 meters in
diameter and 10.8 meters in length (twice the volume of the space
shuttle) * There is also 20.2 metric tons of added thermal protection
and fold-away wings to allow the empty stage to operate as a glider.
The system is fully reusable 2,000 times.


TWO ELEMENT TWO STAGE TO ORBIT


Equipped with Cross Feed a two element two stage system is made. *The
booster element feeds propellant to the orbiter element at lift off.
This vehicle carries 157.2 metric tons to orbit in a 33.9 meter long
inter-tank region in the orbiter. * * *Thus, the booster element is
73.9 meters long while the booster element is 46.9 meters long. *The
system is fully reusable 2,000 times.


THREE ELEMENT TWO STAGE TO ORBIT


Two outboard booster elements feed propellant to a central stage at
lift off. *The booster elements are 46.9 meters long while the orbiter
element is 101.7 meters long. *The vehicle carries 253.9 metric tons
payload.


SEVEN ELEMENT THREE STAGE TO ORBIT


A central element operating as a third stage is fed at launch by two
outboard elements forming a second stage. *Each of the second stage
outboard elements are each fed by two additional outboard elements
creating a first stage. *The four first stage elements are drained
first, the two second stage elements are drained next. *These six
booster elements are each 46.9 meters long while the orbiter element
is *186.8 meters long. *The vehicle carries 648 metric tons to
orbit.


MISSIONS


SINGLE LAUNCH MARS ROUND TRIP


The 648 metric ton element , 41 meters long, carries 6.1 metric tons
to Mars surface and back, reusing the spacecraft.


DUAL LAUNCH MOON ROUND TRIP


The 648 metric ton element, 41 meters long system transfers 583.6 tons
of propellant to the two element two stage launcher orbiter on orbit.
The orbiter carries 105.5 tons to the moon and back returning the
spacecraft.


DUAL LAUNCH MARS ROUND TRIP WITH IN-SITU REFUELING


The 648 metric ton element, 41 meters long system transfers 583.6 tons
of propellant to the three element two stage launcher‘s orbiter
carrying 253.9 metric tons of payload. *The vehicle lands 253.9 metric
tons on Mars’ surface. *Once there, 583.6 tons of propellant is made
on Mars surface from local water supplies and solar energy. *156.4
metric tons of payload is left permanently on the surface of Mars
while 97.5 metric tons of payload is returned to Earth, along with the
vehicle, which may be reused 2,000x.


Once you are in charge of our NASA or its replacement, what are you
going to do with Fred J. McCall and others of his kind?

*~ BG


What must I do? Being successful on the scale we're talking about,
should that come to pass, gives me the luxury of saying I'm right -
and ignoring those who didn't get before the success. That's okay,
foolishness is a barrier to entry for most.
  #8  
Old April 27th 10, 04:34 AM posted to sci.space.policy
William Mook[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,840
Default Obama's plans even wackier than those of Bush

Tele-robotic labor will promote real growth at 4% in the wealthiest
nations, 7% in developed nations, average growth at 9.5% world wide,
and growth of 10% in Less Developed Nations.

This function of rapid growth in the poorer nations along with strong
growth in wealthy nations will lead to parity an equality of income
among all humans by the time robots are sophisticated enough to do
away with human labor altogether while strong growth across the board
reduces political and economic tensions generally.

Here is a list of the top 8 and bottom 8 of the 193 nations in the
world, ranked by income;

Income Growth Country Rank

$122,100 4.00% Lichtenstein 1
$121,400 4.03% Qatar 2
$77,600 6.19% Luxembourg 3
$69,900 6.57% Bermuda 4
$59,300 7.09% Norway 5
$55,800 7.26% Jersey 6
$50,300 7.53% Kuwait 7
$50,100 7.54% Singapore 8

* * *

$10,500 9.49% World average

* * *

$700 9.98% Eritrea 186
$700 9.98% Niger 187
$600 9.98% Guinea-Bissau 188
$600 9.98% Somolia 189
$500 9.99% Liberia 190
$300 10.00% Burundi 191
$300 10.00% Congo 192
$200 10.00% Zimbabwe 193

A citizen of Lichtenstein earns 610x as much on average as a citizen
in Zimbabwe. With a difference of 6% growth rate between the two
nations they will equal one another in 114 years when both surpass
$10.9 million per person per year. Zimbabwe surpasses today's world
average in 41 years and today's USA income in 54 years. Everyone
equals one another in 114 years at $10.9 million per year. Human
labor will have been a thing of the past for 75 years by that time -
according to Hans Moravec and Raymond Kurzweil.


  #9  
Old April 29th 10, 12:58 AM posted to sci.space.policy
William Mook[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,840
Default Obama's plans even wackier than those of Bush

I proposed converting our stockpile of fissile materials to non-
threatening impulse units at an AIAA conference in Dayton Ohio in
1990, as a way to avoid the threat of loose nukes following the
collapse of USSR. I showed how this was a better approach to non-
proliferation since it inspired cooperation and cost less than SDI and
had longer lasting benefits.

Since that time I have repeated my points any time that seemed
beneficial.

I wish I could take absolute credit for all these ideas. However,
they were explored rather fully by Leo Szilard as early as 1934. He
even wrote an addendum to Einstein's paper to FDR in 1940 noting the
importance of the long-range nuclear rocket. It was this addendum
that caused Truman to include rocket scientists in Project Paperclip
in 1945 by JIOA division of OSS.

So, its not like folks at the highest level don't know the stakes and
capabilities or haven't taken action on them.

I am hopeful.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOpCMnLoM1c
  #10  
Old April 29th 10, 05:05 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Obama's plans even wackier than those of Bush

On Apr 28, 4:58*pm, William Mook wrote:
I proposed converting our stockpile of fissile materials to non-
threatening impulse units at an AIAA conference in Dayton Ohio in
1990, as a way to avoid the threat of loose nukes following the
collapse of USSR. *I showed how this was a better approach to non-
proliferation since it inspired cooperation and cost less than SDI and
had longer lasting benefits.

Since that time I have repeated my points any time that seemed
beneficial.

I wish I could take absolute credit for all these ideas. *However,
they were explored rather fully by Leo Szilard as early as 1934. *He
even wrote an addendum to Einstein's paper to FDR in 1940 noting the
importance of the long-range nuclear rocket. *It was this addendum
that caused Truman to include rocket scientists in Project Paperclip
in 1945 by JIOA division of OSS.

So, its not like folks at the highest level don't know the stakes and
capabilities or haven't taken action on them.

I am hopeful.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOpCMnLoM1c


So was Jesus Christ and a few million Jews, hopeful. Guess what
happened next?

Exactly what part of our mainstream status quo don't you get?

If all the past, present and future bad guys are never policed for
their past, present or future debauchery, what exactly makes you think
they are just going to sit passively, as you run all over them and
take away most of their loot.

The top ten global corporations that you'd have to control is going to
be multi-trillion spendy as all get out, just in order to have
controlling interest in each and every one of them. Are there even 10
CEOs you'd dare trust behind your back?

~ BG
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obama's Moon Frank Robertson Policy 0 February 9th 10 03:55 AM
Undisclosed BUSH/NASA AGENDA: Bush/Halliburton Want the Oil on Mars Scott Hedrick Policy 27 March 18th 04 05:53 AM
Undisclosed BUSH/NASA AGENDA: Bush/Halliburton Want the Oil on Mars Kent Betts History 20 March 18th 04 05:53 AM
Undisclosed BUSH/NASA AGENDA: Bush/Halliburton Want the Oil on Mars RDG History 3 March 12th 04 01:16 AM
Undisclosed BUSH/NASA AGENDA: Bush/Halliburton Want the Oil on Mars James Oberg History 1 March 10th 04 12:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.