Undisclosed BUSH/NASA AGENDA: Bush/Halliburton Want the Oil on Mars

"James Oberg" wrote in message
...

This is too good NOT to share with space buffs who will enjoy it for its
comic value.

THis is what happens when Brad Guth and Min breed.

So if coal deposits appear on Mars, we won't necessarily go there in the next 25
years. We need to develop clean coal technology first. THen there is that coal
fired return vehicle.
This is good stuff, Jim!

"*" wrote in
I don't think NASA would appreciate you laughing at them.

What DO you think? Look it up in a dictionary if the word puzzles you.

On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:40:34 -0500, RDG wrote:

So if coal deposits appear on Mars, we won't necessarily go there in the next 25
years. We need to develop clean coal technology first. THen there is that coal
fired return vehicle.
This is good stuff, Jim!

Admit it. Money motivates NASA.

On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:52:06 GMT, "James Oberg"
wrote:


"*" wrote in
I don't think NASA would appreciate you laughing at them.

What DO you think? Look it up in a dictionary if the word puzzles you.

Stupid ass.

"*"

I don't think NASA would appreciate you laughing at them.

Excessive quoting is BAD ETIQUETTE. A waste of BANDWIDTH. I am guessing
YOU are twelve YEARS OLD! Oberg is a WELL KNOWN journalist, NASA employee
(FORMER!!!!!)...use YOUR BRAIN!!

I like the way the caps say I AM a NET KOOK. It is clearly PATHOLOGICAL!

On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 20:55:35 GMT, "James Oberg"
wrote:

This is too good NOT to share with space buffs who will enjoy it for its
comic value.

There's something funny about some dope concocting a conspiracy theory
because he/she/it never heard of the National Aeronautics and Space
Act(s)?

Whatever turns you on ....




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"RDG" wrote in message
...
So if coal deposits appear on Mars, we won't necessarily go there in the
next 25
years. We need to develop clean coal technology first. THen there is
that coal
fired return vehicle.

Hmmm, how to shovel coal in zero gravity ;-)

This is good stuff, Jim!

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 03:28:08 -0600, "Kent Betts"
wrote:


"*"

I don't think NASA would appreciate you laughing at them.

Excessive quoting is BAD ETIQUETTE.

Ha ha. Like civility is prevalent AAV.

A waste of BANDWIDTH.

Your response was a waste of bandwidth.

I am guessing YOU are twelve YEARS OLD!

Some days I am.

Oberg is a WELL KNOWN journalist, NASA employee
(FORMER!!!!!)...use YOUR BRAIN!!

Anyone can fake anyone on the internet.

I like the way the caps say I AM a NET KOOK. It is clearly PATHOLOGICAL!

Yes you are.

In article ,
* wrote:
"Kent Betts" wrote:
Oberg is a WELL KNOWN journalist, NASA employee
(FORMER!!!!!)...use YOUR BRAIN!!

Anyone can fake anyone on the internet.

For those who are not regular visitors to the sci.space.*
newsgroups, Jim Oberg is in fact a regular poster (less so
in the last few years, but well known), is the same
Jim Oberg who appears on various national news programs
from time to time, who used to work for NASA in shuttle
flight control, has written extensively on Soviet and
western space programs etc.

A large number of movers and shakers in the space business
either hang out in, or have hung out in, the sci.space.*
newsgroups over the years. Not so much the NASA or large
space company establishments (plenty of individuals,
but not high level), but principals and key staff of
many smaller companies have been around these groups
extensively over the years. Many of them are posting
a lot less now, but still read from time to time.

Most of us will be at Space Access 04 in Phoenix in
six weeks, too. We buy each other drinks and stay up all
night trading rocket test accident war stories.

I don't particularly care what the background level
of scepticism is on alt.alien.visitors, but if you
are going to crosspost into sci.space newsgroups,
please be aware that you are talking to a set of
people that includes (but is not exclusively) the
actual professional community. An odd slice through
it in many ways; most of the money is in places
that the people here aren't. But a lot of the
innovative activity and innovative companies and
people are here and well represented.


-george william herbert