![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fission fragment rockets have been proposed where the thrust is
provided by the very energetic fission fragments from fissioning uranium. The extremely high speed of these fragments could yield an ISP of up to 1,000,000 making it suitable for very deep space missions. In such a reactor, the fissionable material is arranged so that not only can criticality be achieved but so the fission fragments can escape from the core to be directed via magnetic fields. To achieve this, two types have been proposed, the disc reactor where discs of U are rotated so that criticality occurrs on a segment of a rotating U disc and it emits fragments and it rotates so the disc can cool. There is also a proposed "Dusty Fission Fragment" reactor where the fuel is composed of submicron particles of sufficient density to achieve criticality but small enough so the fragments can escape and the fuel particles can cool. Both designs suffer from the need to cool the fissioning fuel while maintaning criticality. I propose a Thorium fission fragment rocket that does not achieve criticality but does act as an "Energy Amplifier" as in Carlo Rubia's original idea. However, in this concept, we intend to use the fission fragments from the U233 (produced from the Thorium) to produce thrust. Fission is driven by means of spallation neutrons from a proton beam onto a heavy target material or by means of a good neutron emitter such as Cf. The "gain" from such a device would be on the order of 60x as originally proposed by Rubia. The Th would have to be arranged to absorb the starting neutrons and to capture the neutrons emitted by the U233 with very high efficiency but to also allow the emitted fission fragments to be used for thrust. Thus, fine particles would probably be best similar to the "Dusty Fission Fragment Rocket". The advantages of my Thorium Fission Fragment Rocket (TFFR) would be that the fuel particles would be cool because there is no criticality meaning that design is much easier and there is no possibility of a "runaway" reaction. Furthermore, the power output and hence the thrust can be varied by varying the neutron input whereas the "Dusty Fission Fraqment Rocket" has a minimum power level needed to maintain criticality. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Did IBCMs (Titan Missiles) use Mag/Thorium? | [email protected] | History | 13 | August 3rd 07 02:54 AM |
Thorium Propulsion? | [email protected] | Policy | 19 | January 13th 07 10:33 PM |
Thorium Energy Amplifier | manofsanATyahoo.com | Technology | 2 | November 30th 05 09:33 PM |
Fission product rocket and GCNR | [email protected] | Policy | 0 | October 22nd 05 10:13 PM |