A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Research
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Discrete Sources Generate Galactic Ridge X-Ray Ridge



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 1st 09, 09:30 AM posted to sci.astro.research
Knecht
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 103
Default Discrete Sources Generate Galactic Ridge X-Ray Ridge

In a paper about to be published in Nature,
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...904.4649v1.pdf , Revnivtsev
et al have definitively demonstrated that the "diffuse" galactic X-ray
ridge is produced by discrete stellar-mass objects.

The authors speculate that the discrete sources, which have X-ray
luminosities in the 10^29 - 10^30 erg/sec range, may be accreting
white dwarf stars or coronally active stars.

Another possibility was predicted in 1987 [Oldershaw, R.L.,
Astrophysical Journal, 322, 34-36, 1987]. Discrete Scale Relativity
predicted that the galactic dark matter is primarily in the form of
Kerr-Newman black holes with masses of either 0.145 solar masses or
0.58 solar masses.

It was predicted in the ApJ paper that the members of this population
that reside in the galactic disk would emit accretion-generated X-rays
at luminosities of about 10^29 erg/sec to 10^30 erg/sec.

Is there a way to decide whether the discrete galactic X-ray ridge
sources are the more conventional accreting white dwarfs/coronally
active stars, or whether this population is comprised of the more
unconventional population of Kerr-Newman black holes? Happily there is
a definitive test. White dwarfs and coronally active stars would not
be expected to generate much Gamma-ray radiation, but the Kerr-Newman
population would. Possibly the Fermi Gamma-ray telescope has the
capability to sort this out. If the discrete galactic ridge X-ray
sources are Gamma-ray emitters, then a new and almost completely
unexpected stellar population will be revealed

The proposed Kerr-Newman black hole population should be even more
abundant in the galactic halo, where their accretion-generated X-ray
luminosities were predicted to be more in the 10^26 erg/sec to 10^27
erg/sec range. A fairly isotropic high latitude Gamma-ray emission
from the galactic halo might be a signature of the predicted
population of black holes.

The Kerr-Newman Black holes would also offer an empirically consistent
explanation for the MACHO microlensing results, and they offer a
viable candidate for the enigmatic galactic dark matter that has
eluded explanation for so long.

Yours in science,
Robert L. Oldershaw
  #2  
Old May 1st 09, 12:42 PM posted to sci.astro.research
Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 198
Default Discrete Sources Generate Galactic Ridge X-Ray Ridge

In article , Knecht
writes:

In a paper about to be published in Nature,
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/...904.4649v1.pdf , Revnivtsev
et al have definitively demonstrated that the "diffuse" galactic X-ray
ridge is produced by discrete stellar-mass objects.

The authors speculate that the discrete sources, which have X-ray
luminosities in the 10^29 - 10^30 erg/sec range, may be accreting
white dwarf stars or coronally active stars.

Another possibility was predicted in 1987 [Oldershaw, R.L.,
Astrophysical Journal, 322, 34-36, 1987]. Discrete Scale Relativity
predicted that the galactic dark matter is primarily in the form of
Kerr-Newman black holes with masses of either 0.145 solar masses or
0.58 solar masses.

It was predicted in the ApJ paper that the members of this population
that reside in the galactic disk would emit accretion-generated X-rays
at luminosities of about 10^29 erg/sec to 10^30 erg/sec.

Is there a way to decide whether the discrete galactic X-ray ridge
sources are the more conventional accreting white dwarfs/coronally
active stars, or whether this population is comprised of the more
unconventional population of Kerr-Newman black holes? Happily there is
a definitive test.


Let me rephrase this. Discrete Scale Relativity makes a falsifiable
prediction. So, if these X-ray sources turn out to be normal stars and
not Kerr-Newman black holes, Discrete Scale Relativity is falsified,
right?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iapetus ridge shots Jason H. Astronomy Misc 0 September 13th 07 07:33 AM
Iapetus ridge shots Jason H. Amateur Astronomy 0 September 13th 07 07:33 AM
Iapetus Ridge solved?? Ray Vingnutte Misc 0 May 12th 05 09:00 PM
Iapetus ridge Paul Henney UK Astronomy 15 January 9th 05 10:06 PM
Oak Ridge space history Allen Thomson History 0 December 8th 03 09:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.