![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I read a couple of papers about stellar classification in
which classification results were reported not in terms of error rate, as it is usually done in classification, but instead in something like : classification accuracy is 1.6 subclasses. I don't think I fully understand this system. Does classification accuracy of 2 subclasses means that all objects were classified either correctly or with neighbouring class ? Not a single object was classified with a different, completely randomn class ? I find it hardly reasonable. And what about accuracy of 1.6 subclasses ? Does that mean that 40% percent of the objects were classified correctly and 60% as their neighbours ? Once again, not a single object was classified absolutely randomly ? Thanks a lot. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Weird Question About How Gravity Works | Mick Fin | Policy | 3 | May 10th 04 07:32 PM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
ODDS AGAINST EVOLUTION (You listenin', t.o.?) | Lord Blacklight | Astronomy Misc | 56 | November 21st 03 02:45 PM |
No Longer Question of What But WHERE? | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 20th 03 01:04 PM |
PX question | Bored Huge Krill | Astronomy Misc | 4 | August 10th 03 02:54 AM |