![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a question that I have thought about for many years to do with
gravity and electric but have never found the answer. As Einstein is not around I thought id run it by you guys. I just don't understand and was wondering if anybody could help. I keep reading in all these newsgroups that the most powerful constant power source in the universe are the forces of gravity. And thinking about it the earth spins at 1000 miles an hour or something daft like that constantly forever which leads me to my question. If say we had perfect sphere and magnets made it spin in a contained unit at 1000's of miles per hour like the earth principal does that give of any electrical charge that would be collected and if so why don't we use that type of power source more often. Does that type of unlimited power source exist and if not why not.? It is an impossible science thing to use gravity to collect power???? If so why? Why cant we collect power of this particular type of force. I was thinking about microchips and how small they are and wondered why we could not put 100's of spheres onto a chip and use conductors to collect the electricity it produces. If it could be done and miniaturised then we could use these unlimited safe battery units for something like PDA's phones etc etc etc. Has any research on this ever been done??? Now I know this question is very strange and a little simplistic but I would appreciate a sensible answer or discussion on this.? Mick |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 May 2004 00:09:26 +0100, Mick Fin wrote:
snip It is an impossible science thing to use gravity to collect power???? If so why? Why cant we collect power of this particular type of force. I was thinking about microchips and how small they are and wondered why we could not put 100's of spheres onto a chip and use conductors to collect the electricity it produces. snip I don't know if this helps answer your question or not, but there are a number of interesting techniques for harnessing the energy of bodies in a gravity well. The two current uses are tidal power plants which depend on tidal water flows to generate electricity. Ultimately, the energy for tidal power comes from the gravitation energy of the Sun, Earth, Moon system. A second method is for space probes to pass by planets in order to boost their speed by the orbital speed of the planet. It converts a miniscule portion of that planet's gravitation energy to kinetic energy of the probe. By "gravitation energy" I refer to the sum of gravitation potential energy and the total kinetic energy of the system. Karl Hallowell |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I found this interesting article: -
http://antigravitypower.tripod.com/F...rgy/index.html http://ascension2000.com/ConvergenceIII/c306.htm Its a interesting subject. I think this is the way it will be done in the future. We have to work out a way of using free energy. "Karl Hallowell" wrote in message news ![]() On Sun, 09 May 2004 00:09:26 +0100, Mick Fin wrote: snip It is an impossible science thing to use gravity to collect power???? If so why? Why cant we collect power of this particular type of force. I was thinking about microchips and how small they are and wondered why we could not put 100's of spheres onto a chip and use conductors to collect the electricity it produces. snip I don't know if this helps answer your question or not, but there are a number of interesting techniques for harnessing the energy of bodies in a gravity well. The two current uses are tidal power plants which depend on tidal water flows to generate electricity. Ultimately, the energy for tidal power comes from the gravitation energy of the Sun, Earth, Moon system. A second method is for space probes to pass by planets in order to boost their speed by the orbital speed of the planet. It converts a miniscule portion of that planet's gravitation energy to kinetic energy of the probe. By "gravitation energy" I refer to the sum of gravitation potential energy and the total kinetic energy of the system. Karl Hallowell |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 May 2004 23:34:25 +0100, Mick Fin wrote:
I found this interesting article: - http://antigravitypower.tripod.com/F...rgy/index.html http://ascension2000.com/ConvergenceIII/c306.htm Its a interesting subject. I think this is the way it will be done in the future. We have to work out a way of using free energy. snip There the problem is getting the "free energy" not in using it. You're breaking the Second Law of Thermodynamics. No one has ever observed a violation of this law, but many people have misrepresented low energy loss systems as net energy producers. Karl Hallowell |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Solar system escape velocities using gravity assist maneouvres | Abdul Ahad | Technology | 1 | April 3rd 04 09:30 PM |
Effect of Moon's Gravity on Earth | Gordon D. Pusch | Science | 2 | April 2nd 04 09:00 PM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
Oceanographers Catch First Wave Of Gravity Mission's Success | Ron Baalke | Science | 13 | August 7th 03 06:24 AM |
Weird question.. | Antti Luode | Space Shuttle | 1 | July 14th 03 04:00 PM |