![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Abhi" wrote in message m... : Now turning to the drawings and first considering FIG.1. This figure shows basic idea embodying the present invention. If some person is standing on platform 9 and he wants to lift himself and whole structure shown in FIG. 1 upward (without aerodynamics or propellant), he need to push slightly point A 1 of left arm 5 and point D 4 of right arm 6 along imaginary horizontal space line 7 towards hollow pipe 8 i.e. center of this imaginary space line 7. If he could do so by his hand or some mechanism (which has absolutely no contact with earth whatsoever), point B 2 and point C 3 will be pushed in upward direction. And with point B 2 and point C 3, hollow pipe 8, platform 9 attached to hollow pipe 8 and the person himself, will be lifted upward. That means the person and whole structure shown in fig.1 will be up in space stationary with absolutely no contact with earth whatsoever. This boils down to lifting oneself up by one's bootstraps. You are missing the reaction forces in your freebody diagram that says this will not work. Phil Holman Now turning to FIG. 2. In this figure two springs, of same stiffness, are shown. Left spring 10 is connected to right spring 14 at point E 11 in such a way that both springs make some angle at point E 11. Now the basic central idea goes as follows. Point A 15 of left spring 10 is in your left hand and point D 16 of right spring 14 is in your right hand. Connecting point E 11 is pointing towards sky i.e. this structure is vertical. If you pull point A 15 of left spring towards point A 1 of left arm 5 and if you pull point D 16 of right spring 14 towards point D 4 of right arm 6 in such a way that “angle AED does not change”, then point E will remain stationary in space. That means the spring force in both stretched springs is directed only towards point E 11. Even though we are pulling both springs towards earth, point E 11 does not move towards point A 1 or point D 4 because this point E 11 can not move in two different directions. Hence point E 11 just remains stationary in space and does not move towards earth. The spring force at point A of stretched left spring 10 and at point D of stretched right spring 14 is “unidirectional force”. Due to this unidirectional force, any mass connected to point A 1 of left spring 10 and point D 4 of right spring 14, will now move in only one direction i.e. towards point E 11. This constitutes basic central idea of this invention. Now turning to FIG. 3, basic structure shown in FIG. 1 is attached to basic unidirectional force generating structure shown in FIG. 2. Point A 1 of left arm 5 is attached to lower end of left spring 10 and point D 4 of right arm 6 is attached to lower end of right spring 14 in such a way that left arm 5 can rotate freely around point A 1 and right arm 6 can rotate freely around point D 4. Bolt 12 is connected to point E 11 and is passing through hollow pipe 8. The unidirectional force in both springs 10 and 14 is acting on point A 1 of left arm 5 and point D 4 of right arm 6. Due to this unidirectional force, point A 1 of left arm 5 and point D 4 of right am 6 are pulled towards point E 11. Due to this pull, force is exerted on point B 2, point C 3, hollow pipe 8 and platform 9. The upward resultant force acting on point B 2 and point C 3 is controlled by nut 13. The mass of platform 9 is greater than mass of basic unidirectional force generating device shown in FIG.2 just to give stability to whole device shown in FIG.3 in such a way that upper side of device does not tilt. The resultant upward force due to spring force in springs 10 & 14 at point B 2 and point C 3 is greater than total downward gravitational force acting on whole device as shown in FIG.3. When we rotate the nut very slowly so that this nut moves in upward direction over bolt, the point B 2 and point C 3 also moves in upward direction. And with point B 2 and point C 3, hollow pipe 8 and platform 9 also moves in upward direction while point E 11 remains in space where it was. This causes the whole device shown in FIG. 3 to be stationary in space with no contact of whole device with earth or planet whatsoever. If the device shown in FIG.3 is in space, we can attach any desired mass to point B 2 and point C 3 so that it moves in desired direction in controlled way. If the mass is moving, we can change it’s velocity or direction in desired way by applying unidirectional force. What is disclosed is best known method and principle mechanism to carry out the invention. However, applying the same principle mechanism, we can construct a device, which might look visibly completely different from shown in FIG.3. For example, Upper ends of left spring 10 and right spring 14 can be connected by horizontal rod instead of single point E 11. As long as opposite reaction starting from upper ends of both springs 10 and 14 are travelling in different directions, it does not matter whether upper ends are connected by single point, horizontal rod or any body of any shape. Instead of stretched springs 10 and 14, stretched or compressed springs, shock-ups, rubber bands, zigzag metal rods, circular or spiral shaped systems, magnets or electromagnets, devices working on hydraulics or air pressure can be used. What is necessary is source of elastic potential energy or potential energy in system, in which both ends of system are moving or made to move towards each other or away from each other, in accordance with Newton’s third law of motion, due to stored elastic potential energy or potential energy in system. In FIG.3, only two systems 10 and 14 are shown in two dimensions. Instead of two systems, three or more systems can be arranged in three dimensions forming cone like structure. The upper ends of every system can be connected to horizontal rod; circular, triangular, square shaped rod, any suitable structure or platform. Lower ends of every system can be connected to one end of separate arms like left arm 5 and right arm 6. The other end of these arms may be connected to hollow pipe at point B 2 and point C 3 in three dimension. Point B 2 and point C 3 in FIG. 3 are supported by hollow pipe 8, platform 9 and ultimately by earth or planet. But instead of hollow pipe or platform, any structure which has mass, can be connected to point B 2 and point C 3, which is ultimately resting on earth or planet initially and which we want to move in desired direction by applying unidirectional force. In FIG.3, angle AED can range from zero degree to 180 degree. Stiffness, rigidity, masses and a length of springs 10, 14, or any system, arms 5, 6 depends upon the application in which this device may be used. In FIG.3, we have used stretched springs 10 and 14 as source of elastic potential energy. But we can also use compressed springs as source of elastic potential energy and by changing angle EAB and angle EDC in accordance with trigonometry, we can move point B 2 and point C 3 in desired direction. In FIG.3, to give stability to both springs 10 and 14, we can pass two straight rods through the center of both springs parallel to length of springs. The rods can be passed in such a way that one end of each rod is connected to each other at point E 11 and other end of both rods are free at point A 1 and point D 4 respectively. Or these springs can be inside pipe just to give stability to spring. Disclosed is a scientific principle and mechanism to generate unidirectional force. From this disclosure, it is clear that any person skilled in art and engineering can think of different designs, using different systems but applying disclosed scientific principle and mechanism to generate unidirectional force without compromising spirit and scope of this invention. Dated this 30th day of July 2003 Signature of Applicant: Name of Applicant: Patil Abhijit Brijalal To, The Controller of Patents, The Patent Office, At – Mumbai. -Abhi. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Abhi wrote:
Om... Sarve bhavantu sukhinah Sarve santu niramayah Sarve bhadrani pasyantu Ma kaschit dukha bhag bhavet! http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf I am giving below mechanism of Action device to generate unidirectional force. Hammer. It's been done. As figures are necessary to understand what I am saying, please visit my homepage [snip] "In other words this device will not allow the body or the device itself to fall on planet even in vacuum without using aerodynamics or propellant." Ha ha ha. http://b5.sdvc.uwyo.edu/bab5/snds/argcstpd.wav Patent pending at Govt. of India patent office Mumbai branch(Application No. 715/MUM/2003 and 754/MUM/2003) I am indeed emotionally drained to extent of crashing. You are indeed stooopid to extent of inanimate object. From the country that gave us yogic floaters and 10^9 people ****ting in 10^6 toilets. "Monsoon" is Hindi for "big flush." -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Uncle Al" wrote in message ... http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf The best reply I've heard yet for any topic on usenet! I am giving below mechanism of Action device to generate unidirectional force. Hammer. It's been done. Actually, with just one finger (not necessarily the middle one), I pushed these keys (patent pending) and beat your hammer. So, the patent shall be mine! Can you imagine how much money I'll make as billions of people type on their keyboards each day? Ha ha ha. http://b5.sdvc.uwyo.edu/bab5/snds/argcstpd.wav Uncle Al is very wise. I am indeed emotionally drained to extent of crashing. You are indeed stooopid to extent of inanimate object. From the country that gave us yogic floaters and 10^9 people ****ting in 10^6 toilets. "Monsoon" is Hindi for "big flush." I think he crashed before coming up with the idea. raz |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Abhi wrote:
[...] Using above laws, following scientific principle has been devised and disclosed. When in two or more systems points, from which the opposite reaction in said systems is supposed to start, are connected to each other in such a way that these points are forced to travel in different directions, then due to connectivity, the opposite reaction in said systems is halted and only action takes place in these systems. [...] When they "are connected to each other in such a way that [they] are *forced* to travel in different directions" (emphasis mine), you're introducing additional forces. It sounds like you're not taking these extra forces into account. So, your claim that "due to connectivity, the opposite reaction in said systems is halted" is incorrect (taking your use of the word "halted" in a way that seems consistent with what you're claiming). Anyway, Newton's laws of motion (which you seem to be accepting as true) mean that your invention could never work the way you claim. Simon |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Abhi) wrote in message om...
Om... Sarve bhavantu sukhinah Sarve santu niramayah Sarve bhadrani pasyantu Ma kaschit dukha bhag bhavet! I am giving below mechanism of Action device to generate unidirectional force. As figures are necessary to understand what I am saying, please visit my homepage http://www.geocities.com/action_device How did the working model perform Abhi? Pragmatist |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Abhi, Laws of physics are not patentable! So even if you've discover new physical properties, ones you share it becomes public domain property of entire human population. All known force field vectors are unidirectional! Force field vector is defined with exactly two points: The point on the source of force field and the point on the object that is in the force field. Sincerely, Mathew Orman www.ultra-faster-than-light.com www.radio-faster-than-light.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In sci.physics, RazroRog
wrote on Fri, 1 Aug 2003 11:29:13 -0400 : "Uncle Al" wrote in message ... http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf The best reply I've heard yet for any topic on usenet! Uncle Al likes to use that one fairly often. Not only is it a great editorial reply, but one might even be able to analyze it to figure out how to put sound into Ming. :-) At least, I hope to at some point. (OK, so that's more along the lines of comp.os.linux.advocacy... :-) ) I am giving below mechanism of Action device to generate unidirectional force. Hammer. It's been done. Actually, with just one finger (not necessarily the middle one), I pushed these keys (patent pending) and beat your hammer. So, the patent shall be mine! Can you imagine how much money I'll make as billions of people type on their keyboards each day? The caveman's foot squishing the defenseless bug predates all of us. :-) Or, if you prefer, slapping at mosquitoes, no-see-um's, midges, etc. (Klonking women on the head also qualifies, although I for one highly doubt that that was a frequent activity. For starters, having one's brain hemmorhage would probably interfere with any subsequent pregnancy.) I claim prior art. Ha ha ha. http://b5.sdvc.uwyo.edu/bab5/snds/argcstpd.wav Uncle Al is very wise. Uncle Al is ... Uncle Al. Intolerant of obvious fools, bellicose and belligerent, mostly right (which makes up for the bellicosity), prone to using 50 cent and $1 words on occasion (presumably to instigate thought), somewhat curious about Eotvos which apparently is an experiment not yet performed, not into detailed calculations but usually finds just the right flaw in an argument, and of course a frequenter of these newsgroups. He keeps us honest. :-) I am indeed emotionally drained to extent of crashing. You are indeed stooopid to extent of inanimate object. From the country that gave us yogic floaters and 10^9 people ****ting in 10^6 toilets. "Monsoon" is Hindi for "big flush." I think he crashed before coming up with the idea. The Web is being slightly reticent on anything regarding flush toilets and the number required in an office building, but assuming we "'loo" every 2 hours and take 1 minute to do our duty (women may take slightly longer), the obvious requirement is 120 persons per toilet (and per sink) as a bare minimum. Of course the duration and the frequency of such depends on an awful lot of factors, which may include the number of trips to the water cooler, the snackroom, the exercise facility, and whether one is allowed out of the building on Saturday nights. I'll admit I've not yet looked in the California building codes sector, though. Unfortunately, California doesn't *have* a Building Code as such, although the construction of buildings has to be in there somewhere, possibly in Public Resources, Public Contract, Water, Health and Safety, or Civil Procedure. Section 114105 of Health and Safety, however, punts back to local plumbing ordinances. Aargh. (http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html and search.) However, Section 114120 does go into some detail, suggesting that 1 pair of sexually-segregated toilets be provided for every 20,000 square feet of space. This helps to establish an order of magnitude but one cannot naively divide 10,000 into 36 square feet (the minimum size of a cubicle, IINM -- I'd have to go looking for that, too) and get 277 persons per toilet, as a lot of that building space is corridors, elevators, walls, support pillars, and of course the actual bathroom (some of which may even have showers). In many cases some of that square footage is taken up by computer facilities as well; they don't need bathrooms, merely heat exchangers, air conditioning, cabling, and other such. (I'd say the bathrooms are a little cheaper, though.) The current population in India as of 2003-03-19 is 1.046 billion, with a per capita GDP of about $2,540, according to the CIA World Factbook: http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications...k/geos/in.html However, there's no mention therein regarding the number of plumbing fixtures. (The US GDP/cap is $36,300. No doubt we have more flush toilets.) As for "monsoon" -- American Heritage in dictionary.reference.com suggests it comes from Arabic through Portuguese and obsolete Dutch. (What the current Dutch word is, I can't say. :-) ) An alternate suggestion coming from Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, however, is that it ultimately came from Italy: "monsone". Apparently Webster's and American Heritage aren't exactly on the same page here. I don't have an account on OED.com so can't check there. Typing in "monsoon" into the new Dictionary of http://www3.aa.tufs.ac.jp/~kmach/hnd_la-e.htm (found by searching in Google for "English Hindi dictionary") produced nothing horribly understandable. :-) Altering the spelling to "monsuun" as suggested by the accompaying table did not change the result. Altering the spelling again after pronouncing the word carefully (the system apparently distinguishes nasalization) to "mOnsuun" didn't work either. Selecting "laRakaa" in the Exercise (one of the example words; it means "boy", "son", or "bridegroom") coughed up an internal servlet error (apparently the old dictionary is not being maintained; I can't blame them) but it did produce a meanings area when typed into the new Dictionary, and a transcription into an unreadable (by me, anyway) but rather pretty script. *checks to see if this particular horse has been beaten 6 feet under yet* :-) raz -- #191, It's still legal to go .sigless. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force Plant 42 may be named for Pete Knight | Rusty Barton | Policy | 0 | May 24th 04 03:38 AM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |
principle of planetary rotation | Marshall Dudley | Astronomy Misc | 121 | August 5th 03 09:10 PM |
GravityShieldingUpdates1.1 | Stan Byers | Astronomy Misc | 2 | August 1st 03 03:02 PM |