![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I have an Astro-Systems 16-inch Telekit Dob that has served me well for several years. (Completed the Messier list last year.) However, I have not been pleased with the focuser, which uses two elastic bands to transmit motion to the eyepiece holder, and I am trying to replace it with a two-speed JMI unit. Sorry for this rather extended note. - Although I have mounted focusers on other scopes, there are some complications with this one that are somewhat difficult to describe. (I'm aware of the importance of good perpendicular alignment with the OTA and the axis of the secondary holder, etc.) The Astro-Systems focuser is mounted on a rectangular box extending lengthwise alongside the OTA. In the box a flat bar supporting several filters is (was) slideably mounted, permitting the user to select a desired filter without removing the eyepiece, by sliding the bar in and out. (Actually, I found that the sliding "filter bar" was unhandy and tended to slide over and obstruct the eyepiece opening, so I removed it from the box and don't use it) Because of the particular design of the "filter-box," replacing the focuser is not entirely straightforward. For one thing, the Astro-Systems focuser has a flat lower base designed to seat on the outer flat surface of the "filter-box". The JMI focuser, on the other hand, has a base that's curved to mate with the curved exterior surface of most OTAs. Second, the Astro-Systems focuser is secured on the filter-box on four bolts that extend outwardly from the box, but these four bolts don't match the holes in the base of the JMI focuser. - So, I'm thinking that I may have to remove them and drill new holes through the box to seat four new bolts to hold the JMI focuser. However, the box is adjacent a stiff, cylindrical piece of bakelite-like material that forms the outer cylindrical skin of the OTA adjacent the secondary, and this material is brittle and can crack (and has). Another issue is that it's not clear to me whether the new focuser should be positioned on the outer surface of the box, or perhaps seated below the surface on an insert of some kind for achieving a proper focal length. (I can't see the inner structure of the box clearly, so it's not obvious whether the box can or should be removed.) OK, I think I can stumble through this task and eventually get the JMI mounted. Before I do, however, I thought that perhaps someone else may have experienced a similar situation, changed the focuser on the same or a similar scope, and can provide some advice or suggestions based on his or her experience. If so, did you remove the filter-box altogether, or just mount the new focuser on top of the box? Thanks for any suggestions. Jim Cate |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASTRO: Advice- Think I should bite? | G[_2_] | Astro Pictures | 2 | October 11th 07 01:09 AM |
Packable Scope Advice Requested | Larry Curcio | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | January 5th 07 11:24 PM |
Replacing focuser on old 60 mm refractor | Bill Tschumy | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | May 16th 05 12:33 AM |
1.25" low-profile focuser advice | Dennis Woos | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | February 18th 05 06:06 PM |
Advice requested about Meade telescopes. | StJohn | UK Astronomy | 16 | January 19th 04 12:23 PM |