A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

1.25" low-profile focuser advice



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 17th 05, 05:08 AM
Dennis Woos
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 1.25" low-profile focuser advice

My son is using a UO 1.25" helical focuser on his homemade 5" f/11.4 newt,
and this is a pain in general, and especially so for imaging. I am looking
to get him a better low-profile focuser which doesn't rotate the webcam.
Looks like JMI has a nice 1.25" Crayford with a short drawtube that would do
nicely. Any other options that folks would suggest? Thanks.

Dennis


  #2  
Old February 17th 05, 07:59 PM
Bob May
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Crayford design is an excellent one as it doesn't have any backlash like
the old style R&P focusers do. Their only problem is that they may move
with gravity if you put a heavy load on them but that can be fixed by
putting the focuser horizontal rather than vertical.
FWIW, I make my own Crayfords for my scopes.

--
Why isn't there an Ozone Hole at the NORTH Pole?


  #3  
Old February 17th 05, 08:32 PM
Dennis Woos
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

FWIW, I make my own Crayfords for my scopes.

Do you have anything on the web about the construction? It has always
seemed to me that the hardest thing must be getting a good parallel flat on
the drawtube (unless one has a milling machine).

Dennis


  #4  
Old February 18th 05, 06:06 PM
Larry Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Dennis Woos wrote:

My son is using a UO 1.25" helical focuser on his homemade 5" f/11.4 newt,
and this is a pain in general, and especially so for imaging. I am looking
to get him a better low-profile focuser which doesn't rotate the webcam.
Looks like JMI has a nice 1.25" Crayford with a short drawtube that would do
nicely. Any other options that folks would suggest? Thanks.

Dennis


I couldn't be any happier with my JMI 2" Crayford focuser. It has a set screw
you can tighten a little for heavy eyepieces, but this makes it harder to turn
the focusing knobs. The adjustment is quite small and you might still have a
problem with really heavy items. But how often is your scope pointed at the
horizon? A Newt will be pointed at a sharp enough angle to prevent the focuser
from sliding inward, most of the time. The 2-inch focuser may be a better
choice for a heavier object like a digital camera, but you need an adapter for
1 1/4 inch eyepieces.

L Brown http://www.antiquetelescopes.org
http://home.fuse.net/astronomy



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
questions about secondary and focuser placement for a 12.5" starfinder Vaughn Amateur Astronomy 2 January 5th 05 04:29 AM
1.25" or 2" focuser??? bob Amateur Astronomy 20 June 30th 04 06:29 PM
Speers-Waler WA's (preliminary report #2) Lawrence Sayre Amateur Astronomy 4 February 29th 04 01:51 AM
8" Homebrew Dobson Focuser - Low Profile? MW Amateur Astronomy 8 December 27th 03 07:34 AM
1.25" Crayford focuser Del Johnson Amateur Astronomy 3 August 11th 03 10:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.