A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A dark future for cosmology



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 24th 07, 03:26 PM posted to alt.astronomy
oldcoot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,357
Default A dark future for cosmology

On Dec 24, 6:31*am, "Painius" wrote:

The Universe is more easily understood using
mathematics. *For example, infinite sets behave
very differently than finite sets. *It helps to have
a solid background in math if one truly wants to
go beyond the many mysterious veils that the
Universe has to offer.

It also helps to have a healthy, full awareness of the **fallacy** of
the Primacy of Math fixation. That's the situation where *descriptions
of effects* ('The Math') substitute for _explanations of cause_.
_Mechanism of causation_ is kicked completely out of the picture, and
the 'schematic' or 'blueprint' serves as its surrogate. Disciples of
the Primacy of Math say "The math `IS` the 'big picture'." That's
tantamount to saying the "blueprint is the building" or "the schematic
is the radio."

There was Einstein's famous statement, "remember gentlemen, we have
not proven that the aether does not exist, we have only proven we do
not need it (for mathematical purposes)." Paraphrasing, "space can be
treated mathematically _as if_ it were a void, not that it `is` a
void." The mainstream spun it as the Triumph of Math emancipating
science its old shackles. Thus the Primacy of Math fixation reached
full flower, bequeathing its greatest legacy, the Gift that keeps on
giving, the Void-Space Paradigm. oc
  #2  
Old December 25th 07, 05:01 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Painius Painius is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,144
Default A dark future for cosmology

"oldcoot" wrote in message
...
On Dec 24, 6:31 am, "Painius" wrote:

The Universe is more easily understood using
mathematics. For example, infinite sets behave
very differently than finite sets. It helps to have
a solid background in math if one truly wants to
go beyond the many mysterious veils that the
Universe has to offer.

It also helps to have a healthy, full awareness of the **fallacy** of
the Primacy of Math fixation. That's the situation where *descriptions
of effects* ('The Math') substitute for _explanations of cause_.
_Mechanism of causation_ is kicked completely out of the picture, and
the 'schematic' or 'blueprint' serves as its surrogate. Disciples of
the Primacy of Math say "The math `IS` the 'big picture'." That's
tantamount to saying the "blueprint is the building" or "the schematic
is the radio."

There was Einstein's famous statement, "remember gentlemen, we have
not proven that the aether does not exist, we have only proven we do
not need it (for mathematical purposes)." Paraphrasing, "space can be
treated mathematically _as if_ it were a void, not that it `is` a
void." The mainstream spun it as the Triumph of Math emancipating
science its old shackles. Thus the Primacy of Math fixation reached
full flower, bequeathing its greatest legacy, the Gift that keeps on
giving, the Void-Space Paradigm. oc

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Agreed, oc. Mathematics is a tool. Sometimes
science wields it like a micrometer, and at other
times, like an axe.

All i'm saying is that if you want to nail something
down, you need a hammer. And you need to know
how to use it.

happy holidays and...
starry starry nights!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine

P.S. Here are some secret sites... shhh
http://painellsworth.net
http://savethechildren.org/
http://home.secretsgolden.com


  #3  
Old December 25th 07, 09:02 PM posted to alt.astronomy
oldcoot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,357
Default A dark future for cosmology

On Dec 25, 9:01*am, "Painius" wrote:

All i'm saying is that if you want to nail something
down, you need a hammer. And you need to know
how to use it.

Yeah, as a hammer the VSP is *used* alright, as a tool of evasion and
denial.. institutional denial of the very real mechanism the math
*describes* via geometry and 'curvature' abstractions. oc

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A dark future for cosmology oldcoot Misc 17 January 14th 08 01:41 PM
A dark future for cosmology oldcoot Misc 20 December 27th 07 01:07 PM
A dark future for cosmology oldcoot Misc 1 December 19th 07 02:03 AM
Dark matter, cosmology, etc. Robin Bignall UK Astronomy 6 March 21st 05 02:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.