![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do vested interests hold back progress?
The three member coalition that come together to shout down any views on double star observing that differed from their own seems to be in some disarray. However their inability to put together a concise, well reasoned or scientifically valid justification for their position remain unchanged. One relies on personal attacks as his only means of communication, one has an undeclared conflict of interest and one stated in consecutive emails that I should take expert advice but that experts often differ! Hardly the pick of the academic crop then! The appearance of serious irregularities in the current system seems to me to be beyond any dispute and the failure of the so-called "professionals" to respond to questions doesn't help their cause. http://www.martin-nicholson.info/1/3cc.htm Martin Nicholson, Daventry, England. http://www.martin-nicholson.info/1/1a.htm Visit the Astronomical Hall of Shame at http://www.geocities.com/queen5658/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Progress antenna pushed back barely enough, photographs show | Jim Oberg | Space Station | 0 | February 26th 07 02:10 AM |
INTELLIGENT DESIGN vs VESTED INTERESTS | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 8 | May 29th 05 02:29 AM |
Why don't these vested-interest environuts just DIE?? | RichA | Amateur Astronomy | 39 | November 7th 04 06:44 PM |
question about back of a mirror in progress | brocpuffs | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | November 10th 03 08:44 PM |
Vested Interest? | OhBrother | Astronomy Misc | 6 | October 21st 03 02:10 AM |