![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To: All
I understand the concept of "ISO" within the context of camera film what I don't understandis the meaning in the context of a digital camera. What occurs when the ISO setting is changed (increased to higher speeds) assuming that one is in Manual Mode? Thanks. Larry |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In the film world ISO is the sensitivity of the film to light. In the digital world it still represents the sensitivity of the whole camera to light. The CCD sensor essentially captures photons in each pixel and then converts this into an integer representing the brightness of the equivalent image pixel. Think of it like this: image pixel brightness = (number of photons) x ISO x (some camera constant) The higher the ISO, the brighter the image i.e. the increased sensitivity of the camera to light. The downside is that the higher you push the ISO, the noisier the image becomes - this is also analogous to the world of film. The noise is partly due to inherent weaknesses in the film or in the CCD sensor and it is partly a limitation resulting from the physics of image formation. Mark wrote in message ups.com... To: All I understand the concept of "ISO" within the context of camera film what I don't understandis the meaning in the context of a digital camera. What occurs when the ISO setting is changed (increased to higher speeds) assuming that one is in Manual Mode? Thanks. Larry |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 14, 9:12 am, "Mark Shelley" wrote:
In the film world ISO is the sensitivity of the film to light. In the digital world it still represents the sensitivity of the whole camera to light. The CCD sensor essentially captures photons in each pixel and then converts this into an integer representing the brightness of the equivalent image pixel. Think of it like this: image pixel brightness = (number of photons) x ISO x (some camera constant) The higher the ISO, the brighter the image i.e. the increased sensitivity of the camera to light. The downside is that the higher you push the ISO, the noisier the image becomes - this is also analogous to the world of film. The noise is partly due to inherent weaknesses in the film or in the CCD sensor and it is partly a limitation resulting from the physics of image formation. Mark wrote in message ups.com... To: All I understand the concept of "ISO" within the context of camera film what I don't understandis the meaning in the context of a digital camera. What occurs when the ISO setting is changed (increased to higher speeds) assuming that one is in Manual Mode? Thanks. Larry- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Mark: Thanks. Your first sentence "In the film world ISO is the sensitivity of the film to light. In the digital world it still represents the sensitivity of the whole camera to light." highlights my lack of understanding. What aspect of digital camera when I increase ISO. In Manual Mode, I set the exposure time and aperture value. What changes when I increase the ISO setting? Thanks. Larry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:48:17 -0700, "
wrote: I understand the concept of "ISO" within the context of camera film what I don't understandis the meaning in the context of a digital camera. What occurs when the ISO setting is changed (increased to higher speeds) assuming that one is in Manual Mode? Each pixel of the sensor collects photons and converts them to electrons. During readout, the charge in each pixel (basically, the number of electrons) is converted to a voltage, and that is then amplified and converted to a digital value. The ISO setting determines the amount of amplification applied. For the most part, changing the gain (ISO setting) has very little effect on the image data. That's because in most cameras the gain stage is after the readout stage, and noise gets amplified to the same degree as signal. In other words, the S/N remains the same. The actual sensitivity of a digital camera is determined by the choice of sensor, and not by the choice of ISO setting. The ISO setting is useful for terrestrial imaging to help ensure that the limited dynamic range of a JPEG file is utilized efficiently. For most astronomical imaging (normally, dim targets), ISO settings are not useful- especially if you have a raw mode file output. You will get the same results using a high or low ISO setting. Actually, there's generally one particular setting that gives the best S/N- usually one of the lower settings, 100 or 200. Astronomical cameras usually have their gain set a fixed value designed to just produce a saturated output signal when a pixel is holding its maximum number of electrons. Since that's usually about one count for every two electrons, some cameras have the ability to change their gain to achieve additional sensitivity when the overall source is particularly dim. There's no point, however, to having the gain exceed one count per electron. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 14, 9:47 am, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:48:17 -0700, " wrote: I understand the concept of "ISO" within the context of camera film what I don't understandis the meaning in the context of a digital camera. What occurs when the ISO setting is changed (increased to higher speeds) assuming that one is in Manual Mode? Each pixel of the sensor collects photons and converts them to electrons. During readout, the charge in each pixel (basically, the number of electrons) is converted to a voltage, and that is then amplified and converted to a digital value. The ISO setting determines the amount of amplification applied. For the most part, changing the gain (ISO setting) has very little effect on the image data. That's because in most cameras the gain stage is after the readout stage, and noise gets amplified to the same degree as signal. In other words, the S/N remains the same. The actual sensitivity of a digital camera is determined by the choice of sensor, and not by the choice of ISO setting. The ISO setting is useful for terrestrial imaging to help ensure that the limited dynamic range of a JPEG file is utilized efficiently. For most astronomical imaging (normally, dim targets), ISO settings are not useful- especially if you have a raw mode file output. You will get the same results using a high or low ISO setting. Actually, there's generally one particular setting that gives the best S/N- usually one of the lower settings, 100 or 200. Astronomical cameras usually have their gain set a fixed value designed to just produce a saturated output signal when a pixel is holding its maximum number of electrons. Since that's usually about one count for every two electrons, some cameras have the ability to change their gain to achieve additional sensitivity when the overall source is particularly dim. There's no point, however, to having the gain exceed one count per electron. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatoryhttp://www.cloudbait.com Chris: Thanks. This was extremely helpful. "The ISO setting determines the amount of amplification applied. " "For the most part, changing the gain (ISO setting) has very little effect on the image data. That's because in most cameras the gain stage is after the readout stage, and noise gets amplified to the same degree as signal. In other words, the S/N remains the same. The actual sensitivity of a digital camera is determined by the choice of sensor, and not by the choice of ISO setting. " Thanks again. Larry |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Jul 2007 16:36:08 +0100 (BST), Thomas Womack
wrote: When you increase the ISO setting, the amount by which an amplifier in the CCD chip in the camera multiplies the signal before digitising it is increased. So each photon hitting the camera generates a larger fraction of a count in the output from the CCD. Astronomical CCDs often have only the equivalent of a 'very high' ISO setting. Actually, astronomical cameras have the equivalent of a very low ISO setting. They hardly apply any gain at all. This is in contrast to digital cameras which apply a high gain when the ISO setting is large. My Canon 300D is closest in performance to my ST8 when the former is operating at ISO 200. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 14, 11:16 am, Sam Wormley wrote:
wrote: To: All I understand the concept of "ISO" within the context of camera film what I don't understandis the meaning in the context of a digital camera. What occurs when the ISO setting is changed (increased to higher speeds) assuming that one is in Manual Mode? Thanks. Larry I use to fiddle with the formulae for exposure--many of the older photography books (the Leica Manual comes to mind) gave formulae for exposure time as a function of film sensitivity and brightness. The general form is show athttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APEX_system I used to write EV = Log_2 (fc·ASA/25) where EV equals log to the base 2 of (brightness in foot candles (fc) times the ASA speed divided by 25, which is the appropriate constant when measuring brightness in foot candles. Essentially ISO replaces ASA with equivalent value. Also EV = Log_2 (aperture^2/exposure_time) In the case of telescopic optics, the aperture is fixed, such as f/7.5 on of the AP 160mm refractor. Probably the most important consideration with digital astrophotography is the sensor noise (some what analogous to film grain)... which is minimized with lower ISO settings. Also see: Surface Brightness of Deep-Sky Objects Measured with a Digital Camera http://www.clarkvision.com/astro/sur...files/introduc... Digital Imaging Information http://clarkvision.com/imagedetail/index.html Sam: Thanks for the links.. Larry |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Chris L Peterson wrote: Actually, astronomical cameras have the equivalent of a very low ISO setting. They hardly apply any gain at all. This is in contrast to digital cameras which apply a high gain when the ISO setting is large. My Canon 300D is closest in performance to my ST8 when the former is operating at ISO 200. I thought the whole selling-point of CCDs for astronomy was that they produced 0.8 or so counts per input photon, and so were vastly more sensitive than film; and that the ISO settings on digital cameras were set so as to knock down this sensitivity to what was expected of film. I must be missing something. I'm not sure how full-well effects interact with ISO settings; somehow I'd expect the level of blooming to be independent of ISO in a camera. Tom |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Thomas Womack wrote: In article , Chris L Peterson wrote: Actually, astronomical cameras have the equivalent of a very low ISO setting. They hardly apply any gain at all. This is in contrast to digital cameras which apply a high gain when the ISO setting is large. My Canon 300D is closest in performance to my ST8 when the former is operating at ISO 200. I thought the whole selling-point of CCDs for astronomy was that they produced 0.8 or so counts per input photon, and so were vastly more sensitive than film; and that the ISO settings on digital cameras were set so as to knock down this sensitivity to what was expected of film. I must be missing something. ISO settings for digital cameras can go up to 2000 and beyond. I don't ever remember having seen a traditional film with such a high ISO rating. I'm not sure how full-well effects interact with ISO settings; somehow I'd expect the level of blooming to be independent of ISO in a camera. Tom -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Less then $250 digital camera? | Dennis Allen | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | June 14th 07 01:18 AM |
Digital Camera question | Ioannis | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | August 13th 04 10:01 PM |
Digital Camera Exposure Question | Richard Griffith | UK Astronomy | 4 | June 7th 04 11:03 AM |
another question on my digital camera and astro pics | pete | UK Astronomy | 2 | November 8th 03 08:56 AM |
Digital camera vs. digital SLR | Michael A. Covington | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | October 27th 03 01:45 PM |