![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Scott My addition takes in time for the first neutron to form. Time for these decaying neutrons to become hydrogen atoms,and helium. Time for gravity to create clouds. Time for the first star to form without any help from heavy elements. I don't mind giving galaxies like the Milky Way just 9 billion years to create billions and billions of stars. Its the spacetime of creating nebula's that took the most time. bert That is all accounted for in the age determination too. And the result is still less than 14 billion years. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott what age did astronomers give for the universe 160 years ago. It
got a lot older in our spacetime,and it will get a lot older in the next 50 years bert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 17, 6:04 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Scott what age did astronomers give for the universe 160 years ago. It got a lot older in our spacetime,and it will get a lot older in the next 50 years bert Our Scott Miller is another devout Zion naysayer, or otherwise that of a brown-nosed Atheist rusemaster of a minion to those Zions that are in charge of just about everything that matters. In other words, if it's not scripted as within their Old Testament, it simply doesen't exist. - Brad Guth |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 17, 6:04 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Scott what age did astronomers give for the universe 160 years ago. It got a lot older in our spacetime,and it will get a lot older in the next 50 years bert Our Scott Miller is another devout Zion naysayer, or otherwise that of a brown-nosed Atheist rusemaster of a minion to those Zions that are in charge of just about everything that matters. In other words, if it's not scripted as within their Old Testament, it simply doesen't exist. - Brad Guth Brad, have you finished those calculations of the position of Sirius in the future yet? Too stupid I guess. I have done so - no need for supercomputers to do it. Did it to check your math. But, that assumed you were intelligent enough to do multiplication and division. Apparently I overestimated you. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 17, 8:50 pm, Scott Miller wrote:
BradGuth wrote: On Jun 17, 6:04 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Scott what age did astronomers give for the universe 160 years ago. It got a lot older in our spacetime,and it will get a lot older in the next 50 years bert Our Scott Miller is another devout Zion naysayer, or otherwise that of a brown-nosed Atheist rusemaster of a minion to those Zions that are in charge of just about everything that matters. In other words, if it's not scripted as within their Old Testament, it simply doesen't exist. - Brad Guth Brad, have you finished those calculations of the position of Sirius in the future yet? Too stupid I guess. I have done so - no need for supercomputers to do it. Did it to check your math. But, that assumed you were intelligent enough to do multiplication and division. Apparently I overestimated you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, you still have nothing to share, except the usual infomercial crapolla of a Zion. Obviously intelligent design simply doesn't apply in your DNA/RNA of Old Testament naysayism. - "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell - Brad Guth |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 17, 8:50 pm, Scott Miller wrote: BradGuth wrote: On Jun 17, 6:04 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Scott what age did astronomers give for the universe 160 years ago. It got a lot older in our spacetime,and it will get a lot older in the next 50 years bert Our Scott Miller is another devout Zion naysayer, or otherwise that of a brown-nosed Atheist rusemaster of a minion to those Zions that are in charge of just about everything that matters. In other words, if it's not scripted as within their Old Testament, it simply doesen't exist. - Brad Guth Brad, have you finished those calculations of the position of Sirius in the future yet? Too stupid I guess. I have done so - no need for supercomputers to do it. Did it to check your math. But, that assumed you were intelligent enough to do multiplication and division. Apparently I overestimated you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, you still have nothing to share, except the usual infomercial crapolla of a Zion. Obviously intelligent design simply doesn't apply in your DNA/RNA of Old Testament naysayism. - "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell - Brad Guth How humorous, you claiming I have nothing to share. You have been given plenty to work with and have returned nothing. You are quite the loser really, and your posts are the evidence. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 21, 9:00 pm, Scott Miller wrote:
BradGuth wrote: On Jun 17, 8:50 pm, Scott Miller wrote: BradGuth wrote: On Jun 17, 6:04 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Scott what age did astronomers give for the universe 160 years ago. It got a lot older in our spacetime,and it will get a lot older in the next 50 years bert Our Scott Miller is another devout Zion naysayer, or otherwise that of a brown-nosed Atheist rusemaster of a minion to those Zions that are in charge of just about everything that matters. In other words, if it's not scripted as within their Old Testament, it simply doesen't exist. - Brad Guth Brad, have you finished those calculations of the position of Sirius in the future yet? Too stupid I guess. I have done so - no need for supercomputers to do it. Did it to check your math. But, that assumed you were intelligent enough to do multiplication and division. Apparently I overestimated you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - So, you still have nothing to share, except the usual infomercial crapolla of a Zion. Obviously intelligent design simply doesn't apply in your DNA/RNA of Old Testament naysayism. - "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell - Brad Guth How humorous, you claiming I have nothing to share. You have been given plenty to work with and have returned nothing. You are quite the loser really, and your posts are the evidence.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Is a true Zion in denial as good as it gets? - Brad Guth |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 17, 8:50 pm, Scott Miller wrote:
BradGuth wrote: On Jun 17, 6:04 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Scott what age did astronomers give for the universe 160 years ago. It got a lot older in our spacetime,and it will get a lot older in the next 50 years bert Our Scott Miller is another devout Zion naysayer, or otherwise that of a brown-nosed Atheist rusemaster of a minion to those Zions that are in charge of just about everything that matters. In other words, if it's not scripted as within their Old Testament, it simply doesen't exist. - BradGuth Brad, have you finished those calculations of the position of Sirius in the future yet? Too stupid I guess. I have done so - no need for supercomputers to do it. Did it to check your math. But, that assumed you were intelligent enough to do multiplication and division. Apparently I overestimated you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It doesn't take much for making another Atheist (aka Jew) go postal, does it. Is that why you haven't posted a link to your orbital simulator results? - Brad Guth |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Scott what age did astronomers give for the universe 160 years ago. It got a lot older in our spacetime,and it will get a lot older in the next 50 years bert 160 years ago, there was still the influence of religious thinking in age determination. But, if you can prove the current observations are in error, please step up to the plate. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 17, 8:48 pm, Scott Miller wrote:
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Scott what age did astronomers give for the universe 160 years ago. It got a lot older in our spacetime,and it will get a lot older in the next 50 years bert 160 years ago, there was still the influence of religious thinking in age determination. But, if you can prove the current observations are in error, please step up to the plate. The best SWAG of an open mindset, as based upon physics and the best available science, is looking at 20+ billion years, although obviously this is not the one and only universe that's out there, especially if ours emerged from a mega black hole that obviously had to have coexisted within a much greater mother universe. However, 20 billion years is not suffiicient for complex DNA/RNA to evolve via happenstance into the highly bigoted, arrogant and greedy sorts of Zion folks like yourself, much less of the millions of other life forms that are complex and having been so much smarter about their survival than us humans. - "whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell - Brad Guth |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Infinite Universe versus volatile Universe | G. L. Bradford | Policy | 3 | June 21st 06 12:49 PM |
Map of the Universe | Matalog | Misc | 44 | May 16th 06 11:06 PM |
BW universe | Nobw | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | November 22nd 04 08:16 AM |
Universe | Lloyd JONES | Misc | 2 | May 2nd 04 01:07 PM |
parllel universe have diffrent speed of light 128 168 300 299 thats how you find diffrent universe i'm from the planet earth that is the 7th from the sun stuck on one that the planet is 3rd from the sun the speed of light is 128 and 32 dimentions | Roger Wilco | Misc | 1 | December 30th 03 10:15 PM |