Chances are the big bang if happened, a lot older

In article om,
wrote:

he proof lays in pointing Hubble into a dark area in deep space,
and gathering information. the Deep Space photo represents a
region 400-800 million years after the big bang. I propose that
gathering faint signals from a dark region in the deep space
would reach space that is past the big bang. And what would
we see? I am pretty certain: Just a similar galaxies upon galaxies
picture. And the galaxies in the deep space picture look like
ordinary galaxies, that quietly do what galaxies do. Shouldn't
it take a long time for galaxies to form, for space to clear up?
By the way, its been already found that in deep space regions
scientists found no traces of gasses that they prediced that
those gasses should be there after the Big Bang. The Universe
is a lot older.

Talking to yourself again, kook?

--
Saucerhead lingo #137

"(we) whupped yer incredible arse bigtime" = "we were asked a lot of
unanswerable questions we decided to avoid answering and kept repeating the
same old discredited nonsense".

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

he proof lays in pointing Hubble into a dark area in deep space,
and gathering information. the Deep Space photo represents a
region 400-800 million years after the big bang. I propose that
gathering faint signals from a dark region in the deep space
would reach space that is past the big bang. And what would
we see? I am pretty certain: Just a similar galaxies upon galaxies
picture. And the galaxies in the deep space picture look like
ordinary galaxies, that quietly do what galaxies do. Shouldn't
it take a long time for galaxies to form, for space to clear up?
By the way, its been already found that in deep space regions
scientists found no traces of gasses that they prediced that
those gasses should be there after the Big Bang. The Universe
is a lot older.

Talking to yourself again, kook?

hat the FOCKA skinhead?

he proof lays in pointing Hubble into a dark area in deep space,
and gathering information. the Deep Space photo represents a
region 400-800 million years after the big bang. I propose that
gathering faint signals from a dark region in the deep space
would reach space that is past the big bang. And what would
we see? I am pretty certain: Just a similar galaxies upon galaxies
picture. And the galaxies in the deep space picture look like
ordinary galaxies, that quietly do what galaxies do. Shouldn't
it take a long time for galaxies to form, for space to clear up?
By the way, its been already found that in deep space regions
scientists found no traces of gasses that they prediced that
those gasses should be there after the Big Bang. The Universe
is a lot older.

Talking to yourself again, kook?

hat the FOCKA skinhead?

Hat the FOCKA skaw.

he proof lays in pointing Hubble into a dark area in deep space,
and gathering information. the Deep Space photo represents a
region 400-800 million years after the big bang. I propose that
gathering faint signals from a dark region in the deep space
would reach space that is past the big bang. And what would
we see? I am pretty certain: Just a similar galaxies upon galaxies
picture. And the galaxies in the deep space picture look like
ordinary galaxies, that quietly do what galaxies do. Shouldn't
it take a long time for galaxies to form, for space to clear up?
By the way, its been already found that in deep space regions
scientists found no traces of gasses that they prediced that
those gasses should be there after the Big Bang. The Universe
is a lot older.

Talking to yourself again, kook?

hat the FOCKA skinhead?

Hat the FOCKA skaw.

Hey retard, go psycho your psycho mother, the psycho whore of psycho
toilets.

he proof lays in pointing Hubble into a dark area in deep space,
and gathering information. the Deep Space photo represents a
region 400-800 million years after the big bang. I propose that
gathering faint signals from a dark region in the deep space
would reach space that is past the big bang. And what would
we see? I am pretty certain: Just a similar galaxies upon galaxies
picture. And the galaxies in the deep space picture look like
ordinary galaxies, that quietly do what galaxies do. Shouldn't
it take a long time for galaxies to form, for space to clear up?
By the way, its been already found that in deep space regions
scientists found no traces of gasses that they prediced that
those gasses should be there after the Big Bang. The Universe
is a lot older.

Talking to yourself again, kook?

hat the FOCKA skinhead?

Hat the FOCKA skaw.

Hey retard, go psycho your psycho mother, the psycho whore of psycho
toilets.

Bush whore.

he proof lays in pointing Hubble into a dark area in deep space,
and gathering information. the Deep Space photo represents a
region 400-800 million years after the big bang. I propose that
gathering faint signals from a dark region in the deep space
would reach space that is past the big bang. And what would
we see? I am pretty certain: Just a similar galaxies upon galaxies
picture. And the galaxies in the deep space picture look like
ordinary galaxies, that quietly do what galaxies do. Shouldn't
it take a long time for galaxies to form, for space to clear up?
By the way, its been already found that in deep space regions
scientists found no traces of gasses that they prediced that
those gasses should be there after the Big Bang. The Universe
is a lot older.

Talking to yourself again, kook?

hat the FOCKA skinhead?

Hat the FOCKA skaw.

Hey retard, go psycho your psycho mother, the psycho whore of psycho
toilets.

Hey retard, you like to be FOCKA boss, you like to be the maff, like
chains, and hitting in the mouse. You like a big, the Bush in da town.

he proof lays in pointing Hubble into a dark area in deep space,
and gathering information. the Deep Space photo represents a
region 400-800 million years after the big bang. I propose that
gathering faint signals from a dark region in the deep space
would reach space that is past the big bang. And what would
we see? I am pretty certain: Just a similar galaxies upon galaxies
picture. And the galaxies in the deep space picture look like
ordinary galaxies, that quietly do what galaxies do. Shouldn't
it take a long time for galaxies to form, for space to clear up?
By the way, its been already found that in deep space regions
scientists found no traces of gasses that they prediced that
those gasses should be there after the Big Bang. The Universe
is a lot older.

Talking to yourself again, kook?

hat the FOCKA skinhead?

Hat the FOCKA skaw.

Hey retard, go psycho your psycho mother, the psycho whore of psycho
toilets.

Hey retard, you like to be FOCKA boss, you like to be the maff, like
chains, and hitting in the mouse. You like a big, the Bush in da town.

Hey FOCKA, you like a big whore bich in prison?

he proof lays in pointing Hubble into a dark area in deep space,
and gathering information. the Deep Space photo represents a
region 400-800 million years after the big bang. I propose that
gathering faint signals from a dark region in the deep space
would reach space that is past the big bang. And what would
we see? I am pretty certain: Just a similar galaxies upon galaxies
picture. And the galaxies in the deep space picture look like
ordinary galaxies, that quietly do what galaxies do. Shouldn't
it take a long time for galaxies to form, for space to clear up?
By the way, its been already found that in deep space regions
scientists found no traces of gasses that they prediced that
those gasses should be there after the Big Bang. The Universe
is a lot older.

Talking to yourself again, kook?

hat the FOCKA skinhead?

Hat the FOCKA skaw.

Hey retard, go psycho your psycho mother, the psycho whore of psycho
toilets.

Hey retard, you like to be FOCKA boss, you like to be the maff, like
chains, and hitting in the mouse. You like a big, the Bush in da town.

Hey FOCKA, you like a big whore bich in prison?

Where is your teeth, focka?