![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was recently looking at an older C8 (1980)and noticed that the
corrector plate (with special coatings) had several small pits in it. Now I know the history of this scope and it has always been properly stored and doesn't have a scratch on it elsewhere. Also when I have looked through it, the images are quite good. I guess the question I have is did this scope come with these imperfections in the corrector plate or is this the natural progression of time? The only thing the owner mentioned was that years ago he had installed a ring magnet on the center of the secondary holder to hold a solar screen in place and that magnet had slowly disintergrated (moisture?) and had to be removed. There is no sign of rust on any of the metal components so I seriously doubt high humidity caused any problems that could have affected the corrector plate. Take a look at your corrector plate if you have an older C8 and tell me if you see any imperfections. Last question, this user has asked me if he would gain much from buying a new optical tube from Celestron to place on his Ultima mount (with PEC). What is your opinion of the quality of the new Celestron offerings (C8) compared to the older (1980) C8 product? Thanks for whatever advice you may have to offer. TMT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ScopeTronix 5th Annual Scopes for Kids Program - Please Read! | ScopeTronix Astronomy Products | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 2nd 04 05:20 PM |
Converting spotting scopes to binoculars | Bill Tschumy | Amateur Astronomy | 30 | July 30th 04 10:21 PM |
Universe is older than the big bang | jacob navia | Research | 5 | May 24th 04 10:48 AM |
CCD imaging resolution of "large" atm scopes? | BllFs6 | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | March 20th 04 05:25 PM |