|
|
|
|
#1
May 27th 06, 09:44 PM
posted to uk.sci.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
registax help
wrote in message
oups.com... With a quality so poor it is no wonder that Registax won't work. In fact, even if it did, the results would be poor anyway. The only suggesiton I feel I can make is to chuck Registax and use Iris. Andrea T. I'll have a look. Thanks Philippe 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Registax help needed | Mark | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | February 12th 05 07:41 PM |
| RegiStax V3 is born .... merry Christmas | Cor B | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | December 22nd 04 06:17 PM |
| RegiStax 2 problem | Peter M | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | February 18th 04 12:45 PM |
| Speeing up Registax with a RamDisk | Leor Zolman | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | October 18th 03 02:00 AM |
| RegiStax V2.0 beta release pending | Etok | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 10th 03 09:20 PM |
Hybrid Mode
