A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » UK Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How fast?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 21st 06, 11:21 AM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How fast?

"oriel36" wrote in message
oups.com...
| Laury
|
| This type of astronomy requires that you immerse yourself in the
| various motions and orientations otherwise it is a waste of time.Both
....
|
| As for the correct answer,well it reflects the original working
....

Well thanks for those thoughts. Let me know if you find a source for
the angles I was seeking, e.g., motions and orientations.
--
Laury



  #12  
Old February 21st 06, 01:10 PM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How fast?



| You will not get a correct answer among people here or anywhere on the
| internet insofar as they use a calendrically driven celestial sphere
| where the Earth's axial and orbital orientation share a common axis.
It is not a put down,it is just the system they consider convenient for
| Ra/Dec is hopeless for comparing changes in orientations which are
| central to your observations and your questions.


Neither will you get an answer among the people here or anywhere on the internet that agrees with
Gezza.
jc :-)


  #13  
Old February 21st 06, 01:13 PM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How fast?

To Laury

Unfortunately the sources which contemporaries adhere to are
unsatisfactory for what you wish and I have explained as best I can
exactly where the obstacles exist in untangling the Earth's axial
rotation from it orbital motion.

The calendrically driven sidereal justification allows the Earth's axis
to drift against the Sun -

http://www.diduknow.info/sun/images/high_low_sun.gif

A slight adjustment based on changing orbital orientation against fixed
axial rotation resolves the issue and I assure you that you will not
find that view on the internet,in a library or anywhere else even
though it is the correct way to approach the material and at least make
progress in coming to a partial answer to your question.

Best wishes in your future investigations.

  #14  
Old February 21st 06, 01:16 PM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How fast?

To Laury

Unfortunately the sources which contemporaries adhere to are
unsatisfactory for what you wish and I have explained as best I can
exactly where the obstacles exist in untangling the Earth's axial
rotation from it orbital motion.


The calendrically driven sidereal justification allows the Earth's axis

to drift against the Sun -


http://www.diduknow.info/sun/images/high_low_sun.gif


A slight adjustment based on changing orbital orientation against fixed

axial orientation resolves the issue and I assure you that you will not

find that view on the internet,in a library or anywhere else even
though it is the correct way to approach the material and at least make

progress in coming to a partial answer to your question.


Best wishes in your future investigations

  #15  
Old February 21st 06, 01:23 PM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How fast?

Here is what you believe -

http://www.diduknow.info/sun/images/high_low_sun.gif

That 17th century hemispherical concoction based on variable axial
tilt to the Sun or orbital plane is just slightly more advanced than a
flat Earth.

The poster's original question remains a good one and I hope he
pursues despite the hideous obstacles placed in his way as it leads to
all sorts of productive avenues.

Btw
I apologise to Laury for the poor way the text in my last reply showed
up.

  #16  
Old February 21st 06, 01:51 PM posted to uk.sci.astronomy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default How fast?

So the homogeneity of the CMB tells you what ?

(and how did you get out of the killfile ?)

--
John Carruthers
http://mysite.freeserve.com/jc_atm/
"oriel36" wrote in message
oups.com...
Here is what you believe -

http://www.diduknow.info/sun/images/high_low_sun.gif

That 17th century hemispherical concoction based on variable axial
tilt to the Sun or orbital plane is just slightly more advanced than a
flat Earth.

The poster's original question remains a good one and I hope he
pursues despite the hideous obstacles placed in his way as it leads to
all sorts of productive avenues.

Btw
I apologise to Laury for the poor way the text in my last reply showed
up.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Teleportation knowledge analizer of the internet matirx! IT's a Roger wilco History 4 July 8th 05 06:11 PM
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! zetasum Space Shuttle 0 February 4th 05 11:11 PM
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! zetasum Space Station 0 February 4th 05 11:10 PM
CRACK THIS CODE!!! NASA CAN'T zetasum Space Shuttle 0 February 3rd 05 12:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.