|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#7
February 26th 05, 02:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"NDT" == N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) N writes:
NDT My point was, if they are moving towards us in any sense, faster NDT than c, then the particle/body/object will outrun the light. We NDT could *see* nothing coming towards us. And the faster it is, NDT the closer it would have to be to "motion at 90 deg to line of NDT sight" to keep from outrunning light that leaves towards us. Yes, but the model isn't that the ejecta is moving faster than the speed of light. Consider ejecta moving at 0.999c and moving toward you. -- Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail: No means no, stop rape. | http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/ sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any complete standardized SNIa data out there? | Eric Flesch | Research | 77 | December 15th 04 09:30 PM |
| Quasar variation - no time-dilation found by Mike Hawkins | Robin Whittle | Research | 4 | August 14th 04 08:31 PM |
| Transverse Proximity Effect with a foreground quasar | Robin Whittle | Research | 3 | August 6th 04 11:02 AM |
| Scientists explain mysterious plasma jets on the Sun (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 28th 04 07:54 PM |
| Jets Spout Far Closer to Black Hole Than Thought, Scientists Say(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 6 | January 7th 04 11:49 PM |
Threaded Mode