Jets Spout Far Closer to Black Hole Than Thought, Scientists Say(Forwarded)

News Office
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts

Contact:
Deborah Halber, MIT News Office
Phone: 617-258-9276
Email:

Dr. Herman Marshall
Phone: 617-253-8573

(From January 4-8, 2003, scientists may be contacted through the Press Room at
the AAS meeting. The phone numbers for the Press Room are 404-460-6842, -6843,
and -6844.)

For release: January 5, 2004, 11:00 a.m. EST

Jets Spout Far Closer to Black Hole Than Thought, Scientists Say

Scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, taking advantage of
multiple unique views of black hole particle jet over the course of a year with
NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory, have assembled a "picture" of the region that
has revealed several key discoveries.

They have found that the jets may be originating five times closer to the black
hole than previously thought; they see in better detail how these jets change
with time and distance from the black hole; and they could use this information
as a new technique to measure black hole mass.

Presented today in a press conference at the meeting of the American
Astronomical Society in Atlanta, the observation will ultimately help solve the
mystery of the great cosmic contradiction, in which black holes, notorious for
pulling matter in, somehow manage to also shoot matter away in particle jets
moving close to the speed of light.

The observation is of a familiar source named SS 433 -- a binary star system
within our Galaxy in the constellation Aquila, the Eagle, about 16,000 light
years away. The black hole and its companion are about two-thirds closer to each
other than the planet Mercury is to the Sun. The jets shoot off at 175 million
miles per hour, 26 percent of light speed.

"The high-speed jets in nearby SS 433 may be caused by the same mechanisms as
the powerful outflows in the most distant and much more massive black holes,
such as quasars," said Laura Lopez, an undergraduate student at MIT and lead
author on a paper about the result. "SS 433 provides a nice local laboratory to
study the formation of and conditions in relativistic jets." Dr. Herman
Marshall, Ms. Lopez's research supervisor, led the investigation.

Matter from the companion star pours into the black hole via a swirling
accretion disk, much like water down a drain. Black hole particles jets are
thought to be produced as some of the matter encounters strong magnetic fields
close to the black hole.

SS 433 is angled in such a way that one jet is shooting away from us while the
other is aimed slightly towards us. The black hole's companion star enters the
picture here as it periodically eclipses parts of the jets. Scientists use the
eclipse, called an occultation, as a tool to block one part of the jet so that
they can study other parts more easily.

Using the Chandra High Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer, the MIT group
measured many characteristics of the jets, forming the best view of a jet's
structure ever obtained. No image was created, as in other Chandra observations.
Rather, the scientists pieced together the scene through spectroscopy, the
fingerprint of chemical elements that reveals temperature and velocity of matter
in the jets. They determined the length of the X-ray-emitting portion of the jet
(over one million miles, about five times the distance from the Earth to the
Moon); the temperature range (dropping from about 100 million degrees Celsius to
10 million degrees farther out); the chemical abundances (iron, silicon, and
more); and the jet opening angle. In a previous observation they measured the
jet's density.

With this information, the team could determine that the jet base was five times
closer to the black hole than previously observed, with a base diameter of about
1,280 miles. Also, from a bit of geometry along with information on the size of
the binary system from optical observations by a team led by Douglas Gies of
Georgia State University, the MIT group determined that the size of the
companion star that blocked the view of the receding jet is about nine times the
size of the Sun. From that, they estimated that the black hole is 16 solar masses.

(For many years scientists have speculated whether SS 433 contains a black hole
or a neutron star. Today's announcement of a 16-solar-mass object confirms that
it is indeed a black hole, too massive to be a neutron star.)

"The uniqueness of SS 433 cannot be overstated," said Marshall. "SS 433 provides
an excellent opportunity to study the origin, evolution, and long-term behavior
of jets because the X rays come from a region very close to the black hole. Of
the hundreds of jets observed in the radio and X-ray bands, this is the only one
for which we have a solid statement that it contains atomic nuclei and for which
we are sure of the internal temperature and density."

Supermassive black holes with jets, such as quasars, might display similar
behavior, but they are so massive and so distant that changes cannot be observed
because time scales are too long. Thus SS 433 serves as a laboratory to study
the jet phenomenon "close to home," Marshall said. As such, further Chandra
observations are planned.

Chandra data were taken with the HETGS in conjunction with Chandra's Advanced
CCD Imaging Spectrometer. The HETGS was built at MIT with Prof. Claude Canizares
as principal investigator. ACIS was built by Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, and MIT. Collaborators on the investigation were Claude
Canizares, Julie Kane, and Norbert Schulz, all of MIT. For images, refer to
http://space.mit.edu/~hermanm/ss433.html

[IMAGE CAPTION:
http://space.mit.edu/~hermanm/ss433/ss433_fromCfA.jpg
or
http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/200...ss433_comp.jpg ]

An artist rendition of SS 433. Gas from the companion flows to the black hole,
forming an accretion disk, heating as it spirals inward. Through a process
probably involving magnetic fields, some of the inflowing material is launched
into a jet at a speed of 175 million miles per hour (26% of the speed of light).
The jet gas then cools from 100 million degrees to 10 million degrees as it
expands and flows outward. During one of the observations with the Chandra X-ray
Observatory, the star blocked the cooler part of the jet, giving investigators
an opportunity to measure the size of the binary system and, ultimately, the
mass of the black hole. Credit: Harvard-Smithsonian CfA, Kim Kowal

In message , Andrew Yee
writes

"The uniqueness of SS 433 cannot be overstated," said Marshall.

Well, either it is unique or it isn't. How do you overstate that?
--
Rabbit arithmetic - 1 plus 1 equals 10
Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.

News Office
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts

[ ... ]

The observation is of a familiar source named SS 433 -- a binary star system
within our Galaxy in the constellation Aquila, the Eagle, about 16,000 light
years away. The black hole and its companion are about two-thirds closer to each
other than the planet Mercury is to the Sun. The jets shoot off at 175 million
miles per hour, 26 percent of light speed.

Great story, but here's another nit-pick. I have trouble getting my
head around that "two-thirds closer". Does it mean the distance
between the black hole and the companion is one-third that between the
Sun and Mercury? Or simply two-thirds? Comparing distance is a simple
matter; comparing closeness seems odd to me.

Axel Harvey commented on the language in a press release:

News Office
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts

[ ... ]

The observation is of a familiar source named SS 433 -- a binary
star system within our Galaxy in the constellation Aquila, the Eagle,
about 16,000 light years away. The black hole and its companion are
about two-thirds closer to each other than the planet Mercury is to
the Sun. The jets shoot off at 175 million miles per hour, 26 percent
of light speed.

Great story, but here's another nit-pick. I have trouble getting
my head around that "two-thirds closer". Does it mean the distance
between the black hole and the companion is one-third that between
the Sun and Mercury? Or simply two-thirds? Comparing distance is
a simple matter; comparing closeness seems odd to me.

It sounds clumsy, but it isn't ambiguous: "2/3 closer" means
"1/3 as far" or "1/3 the distance", while "1/3 closer" means
"2/3 as far" or "2/3 the distance". Complimentarity.

-- Jeff, in Minneapolis

..

Jeff Root (dat's me) wrote:

Complimentarity.

Aw, shoot. I don't know for sure that it's a word, but I
meant "complementarity", not "complimentarity".

-- Jeff, in Miniapples

..

snip

Original site, for sci.physics:

http://space.mit.edu/~hermanm/ss433.html

~

Yum. Black hole stuff. A highly interesting and informative 'press
release', not what I expected.

Look on page 8, and see the sharp peak between 6.2 and 6.3 angstroms -
What is that? The two peaks to the right are Silicon and the peak to
the left is Sulfur (just repeating what is stated), but the other peak
is unlabeled. Interesting by all accounts at either rate.

Has the exact mechanism for the jet formation been decided yet?

(Jeff Root) wrote:

Axel Harvey commented on the language in a press release:

[ ... ]

The observation is of a familiar source named SS 433 -- a binary
star system within our Galaxy in the constellation Aquila, the Eagle,
about 16,000 light years away. The black hole and its companion are
about two-thirds closer to each other than the planet Mercury is to
the Sun. The jets shoot off at 175 million miles per hour, 26 percent
of light speed.

Great story, but here's another nit-pick. I have trouble getting
my head around that "two-thirds closer". Does it mean the distance
between the black hole and the companion is one-third that between
the Sun and Mercury? Or simply two-thirds? Comparing distance is
a simple matter; comparing closeness seems odd to me.

It sounds clumsy, but it isn't ambiguous: "2/3 closer" means
"1/3 as far" or "1/3 the distance", while "1/3 closer" means
"2/3 as far" or "2/3 the distance". Complimentarity.

It seems ambiguous to me. People sometimes say things like: "Mercury
is 58 million km close to the Sun" - not the best English, perhaps,
but common enough. Then 2/3 closer would mean 39 million km, at least
to the people who talk that way. A writer has to think of all possible
ways of being read (within reasonable limits).

Anyway, who says "closer to" is complementary to "distant from" in
English grammar?