![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3948531.stm
"Brazil has successfully launched its first rocket into space. (...) "At the time of last year's explosion, some predicted it would take years for the programme to recover. "Now there is likely to be jubilation that a VSV-30, or Brazilian Exploration Vehicle, has been successfully launched, also from Alcantara. "Sunday's project was a less ambitious one, designed to carry out experiments just outside the Earth's atmosphere at a maximum height of 250km." also: http://www.cbc.ca/cp/world/041023/w102370.html http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=20839 -- -Andrew Gray |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2004-10-24, HAESSIG Frédéric Pierre Tamatoa wrote:
Andrew Gray a écrit dans le message : ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3948531.stm "Brazil has successfully launched its first rocket into space. (...) "At the time of last year's explosion, some predicted it would take years for the programme to recover. "Now there is likely to be jubilation that a VSV-30, or Brazilian Exploration Vehicle, has been successfully launched, also from Alcantara. "Sunday's project was a less ambitious one, designed to carry out experiments just outside the Earth's atmosphere at a maximum height of 250km." Without wanting to belittle the accomplishment of Brazil, this rocket is doesn't have a satellite lanching capability, unlike the one which explosed. It's a sounding rocket. This was confusing me; most of the reports indicated it was the same as the one which exploded (and gave capacities roughly consistent with that), but it did read somewhat like a suborbital launch - and AIUI they've been doing those already. Is there much commonality between the two? -- -Andrew Gray |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Gray :
On 2004-10-24, HAESSIG Frédéric Pierre Tamatoa wrote: Andrew Gray a écrit dans le message : ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3948531.stm "Brazil has successfully launched its first rocket into space. (...) "At the time of last year's explosion, some predicted it would take years for the programme to recover. "Now there is likely to be jubilation that a VSV-30, or Brazilian Exploration Vehicle, has been successfully launched, also from Alcantara. "Sunday's project was a less ambitious one, designed to carry out experiments just outside the Earth's atmosphere at a maximum height of 250km." Without wanting to belittle the accomplishment of Brazil, this rocket is doesn't have a satellite lanching capability, unlike the one which explosed. It's a sounding rocket. This was confusing me; most of the reports indicated it was the same as the one which exploded (and gave capacities roughly consistent with that), but it did read somewhat like a suborbital launch - and AIUI they've been doing those already. Is there much commonality between the two? Without knowing the details myself too, could this be a partly fueled orbital design being tested with a sub-orbital flight. After last year's explosion I don't blame them to try little steps at a time. Earl Colby Pottinger PS. Did they find the cause of the that happened explosion last year? -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Earl Colby Pottinger" wrote in message ... Andrew Gray : On 2004-10-24, HAESSIG Frédéric Pierre Tamatoa wrote: Andrew Gray a écrit dans le message : ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3948531.stm "Brazil has successfully launched its first rocket into space. (...) "At the time of last year's explosion, some predicted it would take years for the programme to recover. "Now there is likely to be jubilation that a VSV-30, or Brazilian Exploration Vehicle, has been successfully launched, also from Alcantara. "Sunday's project was a less ambitious one, designed to carry out experiments just outside the Earth's atmosphere at a maximum height of 250km." Without wanting to belittle the accomplishment of Brazil, this rocket is doesn't have a satellite lanching capability, unlike the one which explosed. It's a sounding rocket. This was confusing me; most of the reports indicated it was the same as the one which exploded (and gave capacities roughly consistent with that), but it did read somewhat like a suborbital launch - and AIUI they've been doing those already. Is there much commonality between the two? Without knowing the details myself too, could this be a partly fueled orbital design being tested with a sub-orbital flight. After last year's explosion I don't blame them to try little steps at a time. Earl Colby Pottinger PS. Did they find the cause of the that happened explosion last year? I regard your remark as a logical interpretation of the reports provided so far as the report did read as if it was a suborbital launch. The report I read said that it was a two stage rocket and didn't applify as to whether they had booster solid rockets that weren't considered stages. I believe they did find the cause of the explosion, something about RF setting off an igniter or igniters. I didn't read anything about how much troubleshooting went on. We just have to wait for more data, if the Brazilians want to release it. Mike Walsh |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Earl Colby Pottinger a écrit dans le message : ... Andrew Gray : On 2004-10-24, HAESSIG Frédéric Pierre Tamatoa wrote: Andrew Gray a écrit dans le message : ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3948531.stm "Brazil has successfully launched its first rocket into space. (...) "At the time of last year's explosion, some predicted it would take years for the programme to recover. "Now there is likely to be jubilation that a VSV-30, or Brazilian Exploration Vehicle, has been successfully launched, also from Alcantara. "Sunday's project was a less ambitious one, designed to carry out experiments just outside the Earth's atmosphere at a maximum height of 250km." Without wanting to belittle the accomplishment of Brazil, this rocket is doesn't have a satellite lanching capability, unlike the one which explosed. It's a sounding rocket. This was confusing me; most of the reports indicated it was the same as the one which exploded (and gave capacities roughly consistent with that), but it did read somewhat like a suborbital launch - and AIUI they've been doing those already. Is there much commonality between the two? Without knowing the details myself too, could this be a partly fueled orbital design being tested with a sub-orbital flight. After last year's explosion I don't blame them to try little steps at a time. No. It's two completely different models. The VLS http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/vls.htm, which explosed, was designed to carry satellites into orbit ( 120 kg at 750km circular orbit ). The VSV sounding rockets OTOH are designed for a balistic trajectory which intersect the earth, carrying a 600 kg load to a 25km apogee. It's still much better than the previous Brazilian sounding rockets http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/vs30.htm, but nothing like the VLS would have been. There's a lot of difference in the delta V required. Earl Colby Pottinger PS. Did they find the cause of the that happened explosion last year? Yes. Not following the safety rules and having people working on a live rocket without taking proper precautions - sparks, on a live rocket. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"HAESSIG Frédéric Pierre Tamatoa" :
No. It's two completely different models. http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/vls.htm http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/vs30.htm Thank you for the information and the URLs. Earl Colby Pottinger -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - August 27, 2004 | Ron | Misc | 14 | August 30th 04 11:09 PM |
Space Calendar - August 27, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 14 | August 30th 04 11:09 PM |
Space Calendar - August 27, 2004 | OzPirate | Policy | 0 | August 27th 04 10:11 PM |
Space Calendar - July 28, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 28th 04 05:18 PM |
Space Calendar - June 25, 2004 | Ron | Misc | 0 | June 25th 04 04:37 PM |