A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

False report



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 3rd 04, 01:44 AM
Martin R. Howell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default False report


Here's one for the books. A week or two ago, I was listening to the radio
one morning. . .NPR, I believe. Much to my amazement, there was a woman
reporting on how bright and close Mars is right now. She said that it was
very near the moon in the constellation Gemini and this would make it most
easy for anyone to spot. The reporter then asserted that Mars was
presently the brightest "star" in the night sky and continued that it
wouldn't be this close again for 80 years or so.

As the details were being disclosed about the planet's orbit and proximity
to the earth, I felt as if some silly mushroom which had somehow gotten
into my system during those crazy 60's had held back a little extra
surprise for me.



--
Martin
"Photographs From the Universe of Amateur Astronomy"
http://home.earthlink.net/~martinhowell
  #2  
Old September 3rd 04, 02:42 AM
Edward
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Martin R. Howell" wrote in

I felt as if some silly mushroom which had somehow gotten
into my system during those crazy 60's had held back a little extra
surprise for me.


Sounds like a flash back to me. You really know you're in trouble when you
can see the sound waves traveling from the radio to your ear.

Ed T


  #3  
Old September 3rd 04, 03:32 AM
Chris L Peterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 00:44:11 GMT, "Martin R. Howell"
wrote:

Here's one for the books. A week or two ago, I was listening to the radio
one morning. . .NPR, I believe. Much to my amazement, there was a woman
reporting on how bright and close Mars is right now. She said that it was
very near the moon in the constellation Gemini and this would make it most
easy for anyone to spot. The reporter then asserted that Mars was
presently the brightest "star" in the night sky and continued that it
wouldn't be this close again for 80 years or so.

As the details were being disclosed about the planet's orbit and proximity
to the earth, I felt as if some silly mushroom which had somehow gotten
into my system during those crazy 60's had held back a little extra
surprise for me.


This was all over the news and the Internet. Somebody picked up a story from
last year's Mars opposition (a pretty inaccurate story, as it turns out) and
started circulating it again, with the year changed from 2003 to 2004. I don't
know if it was a deliberate hoax or just some stupidity.

_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
  #4  
Old September 3rd 04, 07:02 PM
katrinaxx
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The announcers for Nascar night races arent any better. "The full
moon's pull tonight (08/27/04) is causing many of the crashes."

I do believe its the 'moon-shine.'


Cathy



Martin R. Howell wrote:
Here's one for the books. A week or two ago, I was listening to the radio
one morning. . .NPR, I believe. Much to my amazement, there was a woman
reporting on how bright and close Mars is right now. She said that it was
very near the moon in the constellation Gemini and this would make it most
easy for anyone to spot. The reporter then asserted that Mars was
presently the brightest "star" in the night sky and continued that it
wouldn't be this close again for 80 years or so.

As the details were being disclosed about the planet's orbit and proximity
to the earth, I felt as if some silly mushroom which had somehow gotten
into my system during those crazy 60's had held back a little extra
surprise for me.




  #5  
Old September 4th 04, 10:36 PM
Wfoley2
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This was all over the news and the Internet. Somebody picked up a story from
last year's Mars opposition (a pretty inaccurate story, as it turns out) and
started circulating it again, with the year changed from 2003 to 2004. I
don't
know if it was a deliberate hoax or just some stupidity.


I'll go with stupidity....
Clear, Dark, Steady Skies!
(And considerate neighbors!!!)


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Robert Astronomy Misc 133 August 30th 04 01:31 AM
NEWS: Investigator Criticizes Shuttle Report Rusty Barton Space Shuttle 0 August 28th 03 01:36 AM
Columbia Accident Investigation Board Releases Final Report Jacques van Oene Space Shuttle 0 August 26th 03 03:30 PM
Columbia Accident Investigation Board Releases Final Report Jacques van Oene Space Station 0 August 26th 03 03:30 PM
DEATH DOES NOT EXIST -- Coal Mine Rescue Proves It Ed Conrad Space Shuttle 4 August 2nd 03 01:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.