How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error.

Einstein claims that light speed is independent of the speed of its source. He
went to a great deal of trouble to concoct a very complicated geometry that
would make measured light speed always have the same value, no matter how
source or observer moved. His theory includes no physics, just circular
mathematical reasoning that restates his second postulate over and over under
different guises.

Nowhere in this theory does he provide a logical reason why light from
differently moving sources SHOULD take the same time to traverse the same
length of space. Indeed the only plausible explanation must come directly from
aether theory.....that is, a property of space itself determines how light
travels through it. There is no evidence that this is true.

Maxwell showed that light speed is 'c' relative to its source. In the high
vacuum of space, there is absolutely no reason why light should leave every
star in the universe AT 'C' RELATIVE TO EARTH!! How much more obvous can that
be?????

The relativist DeSitter attempted to back up Einstein's claims with a botched
analysis of binary star behavior.

We now know that the vast majority of variable star brightness curves is simply
and soundly explained on the basis that light leaves these stars at c+v, where
v is the instantaneous velocity of the stars relative to Earth. The fact is,
any distant star that is in some kind of regular orbit SHOULD exhibit a degree
of brightness variability, the effect being clearly apparent only at certain
critical distances. Stars presently regarded as eclipsing binaries, (such as
Algol) are NOT necessarily eclipsing at all. Their brightness variations are
typical of single stars orbiting in highly eliptical orbits (probably around a
cold red dwarf) with their perihelion nearest to us.

Most other variable star data, which presently baffles astronomers, is fully
explained by the ballistic model of light. What does the physics establishment
hope to achieve by continually ignoring this fact?

My very comprehensive 'Variable Star' program simulates expected brightness
curves (based on c+v) by solving the relevant equations for all types of orbits
and observer distances. Virtually any typically observed brightness curve can
be produced, using c+v.

So how much longer can the relativity red herring continue to lead science up a
subterranian blind alley? Light speed, in the high vacuum of remote space, is
CLEARLY SOURCE DEPENDENT.

My program (in Vbasic) can be run from:
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/variablestars.exe

It may take some time to understand and master. It is not a virus.

Variable star data is obtainable at, for instance, www.britastro.org/vss/

Henri Wilson.
See why relativity is WRONG!
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm