LIGO's GW170817 Gaffe

"On 8:41 am EDT August 17, 2017, LIGO detected a new gravitational wave source, dubbed GW170817 to mark its discovery date. Just two seconds later NASA's Fermi satellite detected a weak pulse of gamma rays from the same location of the sky." https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2017-30

"The same location of the sky" implies that gravitational waves undergo exactly the same gravitational deflection as optical signals. Apparently one of the greatest discoveries in the history of science but LIGO fakers are silent (don't hint at a second Nobel Prize). Why? The fraud is too blatant, even by the standards of the Einstein cult.

The speed of light is VARIABLE AS PER NEWTON, which implies that Einstein's spacetime does not exist and neither do LIGO's gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime). LIGO fakers still feel safe, protected by Einstein's all-powerful ideology (relativity is an ideology, not a science), but in the long run they are doomed.

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

In the physics establishment, only Natalia Kiriushcheva was bold enough to try to clearly expose LIGO's swindle (generally, criticism is confusing and toothless), but then she disappeared - LIGO godfathers must have converted her into an unperson:

"On September 16, 2010, a false signal - a so-called "blind injection" - was fed into both the Ligo and Virgo systems as part of an exercise to "test .... detection capabilities". At the time, the vast majority of the hundreds of scientists working on the equipment had no idea that they were being fed a dummy signal. The truth was not revealed until March the following year, by which time several papers about the supposed sensational discovery of gravitational waves were poised for publication. "While the scientists were disappointed that the discovery was not real, the success of the analysis was a compelling demonstration of the collaboration's readiness to detect gravitational waves," Ligo reported at the time. But take a look at the visualisation of the faked signal, says Dr Kiriushcheva, and compare it to the image apparently showing the collision of the twin black holes, seen on the second page of the recently-published discovery paper. "They look very, very similar," she says. "It means that they knew exactly what they wanted to get and this is suspicious for us: when you know what you want to get from science, usually you can get it." The apparent similarity is more curious because the faked event purported to show not a collision between two black holes, but the gravitational waves created by a neutron star spiralling into a black hole. The signals appear so similar, in fact, that Dr Kiriushcheva questions whether the "true" signal might actually have been an echo of the fake, "stored in the computer system from when they turned off the equipment five years before"." https://www.thenational.ae/arts-cult...llide-1.188114

George Orwell: "Withers, however, was already an unperson. He did not exist: he had never existed."

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev