|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Origin of Einstein's Constant-Speed-of-Light Falsehood
Einstein "borrowed" his false constant-speed-of-light axiom from the theory of the NONEXISTENT ether (idiocy, isn't it):
Albert Einstein: "...I introduced the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light, which I borrowed from H. A. Lorentz's theory of the stationary luminiferous ether..." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_ether_theory The adventurer was perfectly aware of the fact that, in 1887, prior to FitzGerald and Lorentz introducing the ad hoc contracting lengths, the Michelson-Morley experiment had unequivocally proved Newton's variable speed of light (c'=c±v) and disproved the constant (independent of the speed of the emitter) speed of light posited by the ether theory (c'=c): Banesh Hoffmann, Relativity and Its Roots, p.92: "Moreover, if light consists of particles, as Einstein had suggested in his paper submitted just thirteen weeks before this one, the second principle seems absurd: A stone thrown from a speeding train can do far more damage than one thrown from a train at rest; the speed of the particle is not independent of the motion of the object emitting it. And if we take light to consist of particles and assume that these particles obey Newton's laws, they will conform to Newtonian relativity and thus automatically account for the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment without recourse to contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations. Yet, as we have seen, Einstein resisted the temptation to account for the null result in terms of particles of light and simple, familiar Newtonian ideas, and introduced as his second postulate something that was more or less obvious when thought of in terms of waves in an ether. If it was so obvious, though, why did he need to state it as a principle? Because, having taken from the idea of light waves in the ether the one aspect that he needed, he declared early in his paper, to quote his own words, that "the introduction of a 'luminiferous ether' will prove to be superfluous." https://www.amazon.com/Relativity-It.../dp/0486406768 Wikipedia: Newton's variable speed of light, c'=c ± v, explains the result of the Michelson-Morley experiment: "Emission theory, also called emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, was a competing theory for the special theory of relativity, explaining the results of the Michelson–Morley experiment of 1887. [...] The name most often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpuscular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obeying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and we then expect light to be moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant emitter (c ± v)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory John Norton: "The Michelson-Morley experiment is fully compatible with an emission theory of light that CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE." http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1743/2/Norton.pdf Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Origin of Einstein's Constant-Speed-of-Light Falsehood
The constant-speed-of-light falsehood goes hand in hand with the variable-wavelength-of-light falsehood:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsVxC_NR64M Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time", Chapter 3: "Now imagine a source of light at a constant distance from us, such as a star, emitting waves of light at a constant wavelength. Obviously the wavelength of the waves we receive will be the same as the wavelength at which they are emitted (the gravitational field of the galaxy will not be large enough to have a significant effect). Suppose now that the source starts moving toward us. When the source emits the next wave crest it will be nearer to us, so the distance between wave crests will be smaller than when the star was stationary." http://www.fisica.net/relatividade/s...ry_of_time.pdf This variation of the wavelength of light contradicts the principle of relativity. If the wavelength varied, by measuring it, Zoe (the emitter) would know how fast she is moving, without having to look at objects outside her system: https://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/einste...eird_logic.htm The wavelength does not vary with Zoe's speed - accordingly, Jasper (the receiver) measures the speed of light to be c'=c+v, not c. The truth is Newtonian, not Einsteinian. The proposition "The wavelength of light is invariable", generalized over all possible scenarios, will become the fundamental axiom of future physics. Here are five important conclusions validly deducible from it: Premise 1: The wavelength of light is invariable. Premise 2: The formula (frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength) is correct. Conclusion 1: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a speed-of-light shift. Conclusion 2: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v. Conclusion 3: Spacetime is an absurdity. Gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist - LIGO conspirators fake them. Conclusion 4: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies - near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Accordingly, there is no gravitational time dilation - Einstein's general relativity is nonsense. Conclusion 5: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is STATIC, not expanding. Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Origin of Einstein's Constant Speed of Light | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 4th 19 07:54 AM |
Constant Speed of Light: the Falsehood That Killed Physics | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | July 5th 18 08:47 AM |
Big Brother's 2+2=5 and Einstein's Constant Speed of Light | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | May 10th 17 06:57 AM |
The constant-speed-of-light falsehood that killed physics | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 7th 17 02:56 PM |
EINSTEIN AND THE CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 22nd 15 08:39 PM |