A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Origin of Einstein's Constant-Speed-of-Light Falsehood



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 9th 19, 10:53 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Origin of Einstein's Constant-Speed-of-Light Falsehood

The constant-speed-of-light falsehood goes hand in hand with the variable-wavelength-of-light falsehood:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsVxC_NR64M

Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time", Chapter 3: "Now imagine a source of light at a constant distance from us, such as a star, emitting waves of light at a constant wavelength. Obviously the wavelength of the waves we receive will be the same as the wavelength at which they are emitted (the gravitational field of the galaxy will not be large enough to have a significant effect). Suppose now that the source starts moving toward us. When the source emits the next wave crest it will be nearer to us, so the distance between wave crests will be smaller than when the star was stationary." http://www.fisica.net/relatividade/s...ry_of_time.pdf

This variation of the wavelength of light contradicts the principle of relativity. If the wavelength varied, by measuring it, Zoe (the emitter) would know how fast she is moving, without having to look at objects outside her system:

https://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/einste...eird_logic.htm

The wavelength does not vary with Zoe's speed - accordingly, Jasper (the receiver) measures the speed of light to be c'=c+v, not c. The truth is Newtonian, not Einsteinian.

The proposition

"The wavelength of light is invariable",

generalized over all possible scenarios, will become the fundamental axiom of future physics. Here are five important conclusions validly deducible from it:

Premise 1: The wavelength of light is invariable.

Premise 2: The formula (frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength) is correct.

Conclusion 1: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a speed-of-light shift.

Conclusion 2: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v.

Conclusion 3: Spacetime is an absurdity. Gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist - LIGO conspirators fake them.

Conclusion 4: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies - near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Accordingly, there is no gravitational time dilation - Einstein's general relativity is nonsense.

Conclusion 5: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is STATIC, not expanding.

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Origin of Einstein's Constant Speed of Light Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 May 4th 19 07:54 AM
Constant Speed of Light: the Falsehood That Killed Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 July 5th 18 08:47 AM
Big Brother's 2+2=5 and Einstein's Constant Speed of Light Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 May 10th 17 06:57 AM
The constant-speed-of-light falsehood that killed physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 January 7th 17 02:56 PM
EINSTEIN AND THE CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 January 22nd 15 08:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.