Big Brother's 2+2=5 and Einstein's Constant Speed of Light

"In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. For, after all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If both the past and the external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is controllable what then?"
https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/o/orw...hapter1.7.html

Einstein's constancy of the speed of light is even more idiotic than 2+2=5. Consider a light source emitting a series of pulses equally distanced from one another. A stationary observer (receiver) measures the frequency of the pulses:

http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ler_static.gif

The observer starts moving with constant speed towards the light source - the measured frequency increases:

http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ector_blue.gif

Since the measured frequency increases, the speed of the pulses relative to the observer increases as well, in accordance with the formula

(measured frequency) = (speed of the pulses relative to the observer)/(distance between the pulses)

So the speed of light is OBVIOUSLY VARIABLE and yet Einsteinians have been teaching, for more than a century, that it is constant. "And what was terrifying was not that they would kill you for thinking otherwise, but that they might be right. [...] ...if the mind itself is controllable what then?"

Pentcho Valev