A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Painius should (but won't) understand "the Big Bang theory" (Lambda⋅CDM). 



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 24th 12, 05:20 PM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.physics,alt.atheism,sci.astro
HVAC[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 338
Default Painius should (but won't) understand "the Big Bang theory" (Lambda⋅CDM). 

On 10/24/2012 11:51 AM, Brad Guth wrote:

The Big Bang is a creation myth of science.

--


But as mainstream ZNR approved myths go, it's a good one because it
gives their god that doesn't believe in fair play or hell, all the
credit it deserves.

Otherwise, I'm favoring the Big Ongoing of aether flowing from the
pole of a mother BH, with the other universe of aether and molecular
stuff directed out of the other BH pole.




Just more of the completely off the wall science bull**** from Painus
and Goth. The standard model has decades of observation and experimental
data to support it, yet Painus has a 'gut feeling' that it's wrong and
Goth has some foolishness he stole from some other idiot's idea about
the 'big ongoing'.

None of them have ANY...I repeat, ANY, evidence for their retarded
views. Strangely enough, both believe in ether and god as well.









--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮
http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg
  #2  
Old October 30th 12, 07:17 AM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.physics,alt.atheism,sci.astro
Painius[_1_] Painius[_1_] is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,654
Default Painius should (but won't) understand "the Big Bang theory" (Lambda⋅CDM). 

On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:20:08 -0400, HVAC wrote:

On 10/24/2012 11:51 AM, Brad Guth wrote:

The Big Bang is a creation myth of science.

--


But as mainstream ZNR approved myths go, it's a good one because it
gives their god that doesn't believe in fair play or hell, all the
credit it deserves.

Otherwise, I'm favoring the Big Ongoing of aether flowing from the
pole of a mother BH, with the other universe of aether and molecular
stuff directed out of the other BH pole.




Just more of the completely off the wall science bull**** from Painus
and Goth. The standard model has decades of observation and experimental
data to support it, yet Painus has a 'gut feeling' that it's wrong and
Goth has some foolishness he stole from some other idiot's idea about
the 'big ongoing'.

None of them have ANY...I repeat, ANY, evidence for their retarded
views. Strangely enough, both believe in ether and god as well.


Your lies fool nobody, Harlow. They just make you a laughingstock!

LMFAO !

PS. It would help if you knew the "first thing" about science.

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh."
  #3  
Old October 30th 12, 01:34 PM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.physics,alt.atheism,sci.astro
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Painius should (but won't) understand "the Big Bang theory" (Lambda⋅CDM). 

On Oct 30, 12:17*am, Painius wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:20:08 -0400, HVAC wrote:
On 10/24/2012 11:51 AM, Brad Guth wrote:


The Big Bang is a creation myth of science.


--


But as mainstream ZNR approved myths go, it's a good one because it
gives their god that doesn't believe in fair play or hell, all the
credit it deserves.


Otherwise, I'm favoring the Big Ongoing of aether flowing from the
pole of a mother BH, with the other universe of aether and molecular
stuff directed out of the other BH pole.


Just more of the completely off the wall science bull**** from Painus
and Goth. The standard model has decades of observation and experimental
data to support it, yet Painus has a 'gut feeling' that it's wrong and
Goth has some foolishness he stole from some other idiot's idea about
the 'big ongoing'.


None of them have ANY...I repeat, ANY, evidence for their retarded
views. *Strangely enough, both believe in ether and god as well.


Your lies fool nobody, Harlow. *They just make you a laughingstock!

LMFAO !

PS. *It would help if you knew the "first thing" about science.

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/
"God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh."


The first thing to know about science, is that only insiders like
Harlow ever get to establish what science is. It's kind of a
perverted God thing that ZNRs and their Oligarchs as their brown-nosed
minions that don't believe in hell, always think is so funny as to how
they get to make others squirm on demand. It's why they had a dark-
skinned Jesus Christ put on a stick, because he was a trouble maker by
way of making changes without permission from Harlow.
  #4  
Old October 30th 12, 02:14 PM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.physics,alt.atheism,sci.astro
HVAC[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 338
Default Painius should (but won't) understand "the Big Bang theory" (Lambda⋅CDM). 

On 10/30/2012 9:34 AM, Brad Guth wrote:

Just more of the completely off the wall science bull**** from Painus
and Goth. The standard model has decades of observation and experimental
data to support it, yet Painus has a 'gut feeling' that it's wrong and
Goth has some foolishness he stole from some other idiot's idea about
the 'big ongoing'.


None of them have ANY...I repeat, ANY, evidence for their retarded
views. Strangely enough, both believe in ether and god as well.


Your lies fool nobody, Harlow. They just make you a laughingstock!



Goth, aren't you upset that Instead of refuting my facts, Painus is
reduced to just name calling? If he had any real science, he would
unveil it. Instead he has nothing. So why do you coddle him?



The first thing to know about science, is that only insiders like
Harlow ever get to establish what science is.




Science is not a 'thing'. It is a process. A self-correcting process.
It relies on observations and experimentation to verify theory.

Why is it that you kooks hate that process?



It's kind of a
perverted God thing that ZNRs and their Oligarchs as their brown-nosed
minions that don't believe in hell



Do you have any observations or experiments to verify your belief in a
hell? No? Then shut the **** up.










--
"OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮
http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
there was no "laser cooling" when the Big Bang was prominent #318Atom Totality theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 January 10th 11 08:56 AM
chapt20 "pi" and "e" explained #216 Atom Totality theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 December 24th 09 06:46 AM
chapt20 "pi" and "e" explained #215 Atom Totality theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 December 22nd 09 06:39 AM
" Universe matter develop equation" must replace "The theory of relativity" finally xszxsz Science 0 October 28th 04 08:54 AM
" Universe matter develop equation" must replace "The theory of relatively" finally xszxsz Research 0 October 27th 04 06:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.