there was no "laser cooling" when the Big Bang was prominent #318Atom Totality theory

Alright, I am back up and running on finishing this 4th edition of
this book. The reason I paused
so many months ago, was that I was working on finding the border
between Finite versus Infinity in mathematics which simultaneously
impinges on Physics. In fact, it is easier to find that borderline
crossing from Physics than from mathematics for we need only look at
that last
existing chemical atoms of atomic number such as 120 with its say 300
nucleons for something
like 300! or something like 19^(22x22) to reach the 10^614 to 10^618
region. But mathematics
provides that borderline more sharply with Circumferencing the
Perimeter.

When I last posted on this book I was talking about the close
parallels of why the Cosmos
of deep space is so very "cool" at about 3 degrees Kelvin when it
should be a lot more hotter
considering if the Big Bang were true. The Big Bang is false because
it cannot provide any
rationale why the Cosmic temperature is a blackbody temperature,
meaning the Cosmos is the
interior of a gigantic cavity-- in other words the Cosmos is an atom
itself.

Let me reflect back to that NOVA tv show on Absolute Zero where a BE
Condensate
was pursued and covered a large chunk of the hour program and using
"laser cooling"
Now I do not know when laser-cooling was discovered and first used to
attain very 
cold temperature.
And as the NOVA announcer said-- it is difficult for nonscientists to
ever understand 
how a hot object such as laser light can actually
cool. So maybe NOVA 
can do another 
hour show on just the teaching to
a layman like David Tribble how a 
laser can cool a 
domain boundary.
But what I want to focus on is that the Big Bang theory cannot, and
could never explain 
why the Microwave Radiation is blackbody.
The only logical answer is the Cosmos is a cavity.
In the NOVA show, they did not focus on how a laser can cool a domain
boundary to near 
0 Kelvin. What they should have done is explain that
laser cooling is 
a cavity-cooling. It is a Planck blackbody cavity,
only the 
temperature is cold, not hot.
So here is the modern day problem of the Big Bang theory. If you work
out the physics of the 
temperature of Deep Space with the assumption
of a Big Bang origin, 
you end up with the fact that the temperature
of Deep Space from a Big 
Bang perspective must be somewhere 
around
20 Kelvin to perhaps 50 Kelvin or even the liquid state of 
nitrogen
at 77 Kelvin.
Has any astronomer verified the existence of liquid nitrogen or solid
nitrogen in Deep Space?
Anyway, give a physicist the Big Bang theory and give him the data of
what is out there 
and it is impossible for him to come back with the
answer that the 
temperature of Deep Space is 2.71 degrees Kelvin. His
answer should 
fall between 20 and 50 degrees Kelvin 
because the Big
Bang is not a structure or cavity at the start of the 
Big Bang and at
present day time. So that temperature in the Cosmos of 
a Big Bang
would be temperature that the 
light energy spectrum would not cancel
and thus cool Deep Space, but 
rather heat up Deep 
Space.
On the other hand, the Cosmos was originally an atom and the stars
and 
galaxies are parts of the electron-dot-cloud. This electron
cavity is 
acting like Planck's blackbody cavity, and the radiation
inside is 
cancelling so as to be blackbody and cooling. It is
cancelling, just 
like 
in the NOVA show of the pursuit to attain BE-
Condensate, because the 
matter and energy in the Universe is created
equally and uniformly 
throughout the Cosmos in the form of Dirac 
new-
radioactivities. New Radioactivities is like the laser cooling in 
the
NOVA show.
So it is no surprize in the Atom Totality theory, that the Cosmic
microwave temperature is blackbody, because the Universe has always
been a structure -- a atom that is structured. 
Whereas the Big Bang
starts the Universe as a amorphous nothing.
The Big Bang cannot support a microwave blackbody temperature, nor
can 
it support a low 
cold temperature of 2.71 Kelvin.
So if there are any true blooded physicist remaining who admire and
love the Big Bang theory, the burden and onus is on them to work out
the temperature of Deep Space that 
comes from the fact that the
Cosmos is flooded with neutrinos, with EM 
lines of force, with 
all
sorts of radiation, especially gamma rays and X rays and has a 
mean
density of so many 
atoms per cubic kilometer.
Instead, what the Big Bang people have done is ignored the fact that
Deep Space is blackbody, and have stolen and thieveried the 2.71
Kelvin, pretending as though it supports 
the Big Bang when in fact it
trashcans the Big Bang.
Laser cooling was unknown to much of physics when the Big Bang was
first proposed and its heyday of around 1990. But as we get more and
more comfortable with the physics of laser cooling, it is inevitable
that the Big Bang theory is going to be severely challenged of 
its
computations and calculations as to what Deep Space temperature
should be in the Big Bang theory, and I am stating now, that the Big
Bang would predict something on the order of 20 to 50 degrees Kelvin,
and not 1 to 3 degrees Kelvin in Deep Space.
For me, the Blackbody fact alone is enough to trashcan the Big Bang,
but since there were 
no rivals to the Big Bang up until 1990, then
the Big Bang kept 
sputtering along. But since 
we have a rival in the
Atom Totality, the fact that the microwave 
radiation is blackbody,
is 
enough to trashcan the Big Bang forever.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

On Jan 9, 3:54Â*pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
Alright, I am back up and running on finishing this 4th edition of
this book. The reason I paused
so many months ago, was that I was working on finding the border
between Finite versus Infinity in mathematics which simultaneously
impinges on Physics. In fact, it is easier to find that borderline
crossing from Physics than from mathematics for we need only look at
that last
existing chemical atoms of atomic number such as 120 with its say 300
nucleons for something
like 300! or something like 19^(22x22) to reach the 10^614 to 10^618
region. But mathematics
provides that borderline more sharply with Circumferencing the
Perimeter.

When I last posted on this book I was talking about the close
parallels of why the Cosmos
of deep space is so very "cool" at about 3 degrees Kelvin when it
should be a lot more hotter
considering if the Big Bang were true. The Big Bang is false because
it cannot provide any
rationale why the Cosmic temperature is a blackbody temperature,
meaning the Cosmos is the
interior of a gigantic cavity-- in other words the Cosmos is an atom
itself.

Let me reflect back to that NOVA tv show on Absolute Zero where a BE
Condensate
was pursued and covered a large chunk of the hour program and using
"laser cooling"
Now I do not know when laser-cooling was discovered and first used to
attain very 
cold temperature.
And as the NOVA announcer said-- it is difficult for nonscientists to
ever understand 
how a hot object such as laser light can actually
cool. So maybe NOVA 
can do another 
hour show on just the teaching to
a layman like David Tribble how a 
laser can cool a 
domain boundary.
But what I want to focus on is that the Big Bang theory cannot, and
could never explain 
why the Microwave Radiation is blackbody.
The only logical answer is the Cosmos is a cavity.
In the NOVA show, they did not focus on how a laser can cool a domain
boundary to near 
0 Kelvin. What they should have done is explain that
laser cooling is 
a cavity-cooling. It is a Planck blackbody cavity,
only the 
temperature is cold, not hot.
So here is the modern day problem of the Big Bang theory. If you work
out the physics of the 
temperature of Deep Space with the assumption
of a Big Bang origin, 
you end up with the fact that the temperature
of Deep Space from a Big 
Bang perspective must be somewhere 
around
20 Kelvin to perhaps 50 Kelvin or even the liquid state of 
nitrogen
at 77 Kelvin.
Has any astronomer verified the existence of liquid nitrogen or solid
nitrogen in Deep Space?
Anyway, give a physicist the Big Bang theory and give him the data of
what is out there 
and it is impossible for him to come back with the
answer that the 
temperature of Deep Space is 2.71 degrees Kelvin.. His
answer should 
fall between 20 and 50 degrees Kelvin 
because the Big
Bang is not a structure or cavity at the start of the 
Big Bang and at
present day time. So that temperature in the Cosmos of 
a Big Bang
would be temperature that the 
light energy spectrum would not cancel
and thus cool Deep Space, but 
rather heat up Deep 
Space..
On the other hand, the Cosmos was originally an atom and the stars
and 
galaxies are parts of the electron-dot-cloud. This electron
cavity is 
acting like Planck's blackbody cavity, and the radiation
inside is 
cancelling so as to be blackbody and cooling. It is
cancelling, just 
like 
in the NOVA show of the pursuit to attain BE-
Condensate, because the 
matter and energy in the Universe is created
equally and uniformly 
throughout the Cosmos in the form of Dirac 
new-
radioactivities. New Radioactivities is like the laser cooling in 
the
NOVA show.
So it is no surprize in the Atom Totality theory, that the Cosmic
microwave temperature is blackbody, because the Universe has always
been a structure -- a atom that is structured. 
Whereas the Big Bang
starts the Universe as a amorphous nothing.
The Big Bang cannot support a microwave blackbody temperature, nor
can 
it support a low 
cold temperature of 2.71 Kelvin.
So if there are any true blooded physicist remaining who admire and
love the Big Bang theory, the burden and onus is on them to work out
the temperature of Deep Space that 
comes from the fact that the
Cosmos is flooded with neutrinos, with EM 
lines of force, with 
all
sorts of radiation, especially gamma rays and X rays and has a 
mean
density of so many 
atoms per cubic kilometer.
Instead, what the Big Bang people have done is ignored the fact that
Deep Space is blackbody, and have stolen and thieveried the 2.71
Kelvin, pretending as though it supports 
the Big Bang when in fact it
trashcans the Big Bang.
Laser cooling was unknown to much of physics when the Big Bang was
first proposed and its heyday of around 1990. But as we get more and
more comfortable with the physics of laser cooling, it is inevitable
that the Big Bang theory is going to be severely challenged of 
its
computations and calculations as to what Deep Space temperature
should be in the Big Bang theory, and I am stating now, that the Big
Bang would predict something on the order of 20 to 50 degrees Kelvin,
and not 1 to 3 degrees Kelvin in Deep Space.
For me, the Blackbody fact alone is enough to trashcan the Big Bang,
but since there were 
no rivals to the Big Bang up until 1990, then
the Big Bang kept 
sputtering along. But since 
we have a rival in the
Atom Totality, the fact that the microwave 
radiation is blackbody,
is 
enough to trashcan the Big Bang forever.

Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

What was the temperature of space the BB exploded into ? Heat and
light did not exist before BB TreBert