A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A Flaw the JWST Doesn't (Have to) Have?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 15th 11, 09:15 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Thomas Womack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 206
Default A Flaw the JWST Doesn't (Have to) Have?

In article ,
wrote:
On 2011-07-15, Quadibloc wrote:
One thing about the JWST that disturbed me was the fact that its
mirrors are coated with gold.

While at the present time, the infrared is a very exciting area for
astronomy, the fact that gold is strongly colored instead of
reflecting all colors equally seemed to me to be precluding the use of
the telescope for astronomy at other wavelengths.


Because the telescope is not serviceable, the instrument package will do
a good enough job of restricting the observations to the infrared.


I imagine that it's also extravagently more difficult to get a
deployable mirror to work nicely at 300nm than at 600nm; the
shortest-wavelength filter on NIRCAM cuts off at about 600nm (that is,
JWST cannot work in the ultra-orange). I think the HgCdTe array is
sensitive to shorter-wavelength light, but as designed the instrument
does not have a 'clear' filter.

Tom

  #2  
Old July 15th 11, 10:21 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Thomas Womack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 206
Default A Flaw the JWST Doesn't (Have to) Have?

In article ,
Thomas Womack wrote:

I think the HgCdTe array is
sensitive to shorter-wavelength light, but as designed the instrument
does not have a 'clear' filter.


This turns out to be wrong; the HgCdTe array is manufactured on a base
of CdZnTe which is opaque to the shorter-wavelength light.

Tom
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Congress wants to cut JWST bob haller Policy 71 July 20th 11 07:23 PM
NASA too afraid to name JWST costs Kulin Remailer Policy 12 July 18th 11 11:15 PM
NASA Outsources JWST Launch to Arianespace Ed Kyle Policy 1 June 19th 07 05:16 AM
Hubble's replacement - JWST woes Victor Amateur Astronomy 13 August 9th 05 06:44 AM
JWST Deployment Video Doug Ellison Space Science Misc 0 August 18th 03 04:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.