A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A Flaw the JWST Doesn't (Have to) Have?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 15th 11, 06:27 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Chris.B[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,410
Default A Flaw the JWST Doesn't (Have to) Have?

On Jul 15, 6:29*pm, Quadibloc wrote:

But since a gold-coated primary, _in itself_, doesn't preclude using
the JWST to obtain images in blue, green, and ultraviolet light - the
brightness of which can be adjusted to compensate for the lower
reflectivity of gold at those wavelengths - if it *can* be designed to
avoid being limited to working at wavelengths longer than a limit such
as 720 nm or 560 nm, I would think it is worth the effort.

John Savard


http://www.platinummetalsreview.com/...se&record=1219
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Congress wants to cut JWST bob haller Policy 71 July 20th 11 07:23 PM
NASA too afraid to name JWST costs Kulin Remailer Policy 12 July 18th 11 11:15 PM
NASA Outsources JWST Launch to Arianespace Ed Kyle Policy 1 June 19th 07 05:16 AM
Hubble's replacement - JWST woes Victor Amateur Astronomy 13 August 9th 05 06:44 AM
JWST Deployment Video Doug Ellison Space Science Misc 0 August 18th 03 04:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.