Chapt15.57 ultimate meaning of the fine-structure constant 1/137, the"pi of physics" #1333 New Physics #1536 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

In the next edition of this book I can dispense with the earlier
chapter of 15.55 where I thought a 5th Maxwell Equation was needed.

Chapt15.60 I do not need a 5th Maxwell Equation #1345 New Physics
#1548 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Alright, last night I gained a new insight that leads me to believe I
never needed a 5th equation for the Maxwell Equations and that the 4
Maxwell Equations with magnetic monopoles handles the problem of the
idea that magnetic monopoles never repel but are attraction force
only. So that a magnetic dipole can be a numerous quantity of magnetic
monopoles, regardless of whether they are all "alike in north or south
pole".

The insight is this UNIVERSAL GEOMETRY, I have been discussing lately,
where Euclidean geometry is the union of Elliptic geometry with
Hyperbolic geometry.

Now in mathematics we have rules of negative times negative is always
positive, and negative times positive is always negative, and negative
plus negative is always negative, and positive plus negative can be
either or. A bunch of rules.

Now the deepest and gravest error of 20th and 21st century mathematics
was its inability to ever define the concept of infinity by giving its
borderline between finite versus infinity. In a very long textbook of
mine titled "Correcting Math" I show where this borderline is root-pi
10^603. But perhaps the second greatest grave error of mathematics of
the 20th and 21st century was its inability to spot that Geometry
axioms cannot be where you make tiddly-wink alternatives to the
parallel postulate and thus come up with 3 geometries of mathematics.
Rather instead, in geometry three alternatives exist to a number,
greater than, equal to, or less than, which relates to 1 line
parallel, 0 lines parallel, and more than 1 line parallel.

The second gravest error of modern mathematics is the inability to
realize this formula:

Euclidean geometry = Elliptic geometry unioned with Hyperbolic
geometry

Now that inability seeps over into this rule that modern mathematics
follows, but has never provided for in their axiom sets of either
Peano axioms or Hilbert axioms of geometry or any other axiom set of
mathematics. It is pulled out of thin air in mathematics. It is these
bunch of rules that negative times negative is always positive, etc,
that I mentioned above.

Now earlier in this textbook, I thought I needed a fifth Maxwell
equation of - div*M = 0 to cover the fact that magnetic monopoles are
attraction force only. And I devoted a chapter to this.

Chapt15.55 the 5th Maxwell Equation where magnetic monopoles are
attract-only

div*E = r_E
div*B = r_B
- div*M = 0
- curlxE = dB + J_B
curlxB = dE + J_E
And now we modify the Dirac Equation with a total of 6 terms rather
than 5 terms:
(Ad_x + Bd_y + Cd_z + (i/c)Dd_t - mc/h - (div*M)) f_w(p) = 0

But now I am making a new chapter that says I never needed a fifth
Maxwell Equation because the magnetic current density term in the
Faraday law
covers the fact that magnetic monopoles are attraction force only.

Chapt15.60 I do not need a 5th Maxwell Equation

How does it do that?

Well, it is the negative sign in the Faraday law that covers the
magnetic monopole to be attraction force only.

If in mathematics, you are talking only about Euclidean geometry, then
the rules of negative times negative is always positive are rules that
apply only to Euclidean geometry. But what if we were doing
multiplication in Hyperbolic geometry where all the numbers are
negative numbers to begin with and that no positive numbers exist in
Hyperbolic geometry, so that in this geometry -2 x -3 is no +6 but
rather is -6.

So here is the rub, that in Old Math with no axioms to guide them as
to these rules, and the rules being far different depending on the
geometry they are based in, that the 4 Maxwell Equations already has
the fact that in Hyperbolic geometry -2x-3 =-6.

In other words, the Maxwell Equations of its 4 equations with magnetic
monopoles already surpasses Old Math which made up rules of
multiplication and those rules were unwarranted.
--
Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.
Besides, Drexel's Math Forum can demand no fake
names, and only 5 posts per day, of all posters which reduces or
eliminates most spam and hate-spew, search-engine-bombing, and front-
page-hogging. Drexel has
done a excellent, simple and fair author-
archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen
he

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies