A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving Darwin Evolution & Superdeterminism#1313 New Physics #1516 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 23rd 13, 10:54 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math,sci.physics.electromag
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving Darwin Evolution & Superdeterminism#1313 New Physics #1516 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Alright there is good progress here in deriving the Darwin Evolution
theory and the Superdeterminism theory, where Darwin Evolution is a
subset of Superdeterminism. All derived from the Maxwell Equations
with magnetic monopoles. The Maxwell Equations require the photon or
light-wave to be Double Transverse waves. This creates a wave of 4
poles as seen he

E-
M+ M-
E+

Now when we look at DNA the double helix of a cross-section we are
looking at 4 poles.

In other words, snippets of the photon or light-wave is the mirror
image of DNA.

So that the living moves back and forth between nonliving of light
waves.

So that when a photon is stopped, parts of its internal mechanisms is
turned into either instructions for living DNA or becomes incorporated
into the DNA itself.

In this manner we have a causal chain of Physics of lightwaves that
makes for Superdeterminism and which makes way for Darwin Evolution.

--

Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent,
simple and fair author- archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
  #2  
Old April 24th 13, 07:09 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math,sci.physics.electromag
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving Darwin Evolution &Superdeterminism #1315 New Physics #1518 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Let me correct a error in my last post in that I got the numbering
messed up-- #1314 New Physics #1517 (sic) ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed. So
that this post is #1315 New Physics #1518 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed.


Earlier today I wrote how a lightwave with its 4 poles of Double
Transverse Wave is a mirror image of the DNA double helix and instead
of the base pairs of A, T, C, G we have the E-, E+, M-, M+ of electric
field and magnetic monopole field.
Now we begin to see how Physics produces all of biology when a light
wave created first life of a DNA molecule and then has continually
instructed the DNA molecule on how it works.

We see how Superdeterminism arises as the photons shot from the
Nucleus of the Atom Totality not only created life with DNA but is
constantly instructing what that lifeform must do and act and behave
in every moment of being alive.

And we see how Darwin Evolution theory is but a mere subset of
Superdeterminism, and a sort of guide rule. For in a world where there
is no "free will" at all, is a world where Darwin Evolution makes no
sense, unless it is a guide rule of Superdeterminism.

Now not only does the Maxwell Equations derive Superdeterminism and
its corollary of Darwin Evolution, but the Maxwell Equations elucidate
us on how the Brain and Mind works.
Now for years I have been looking for the Brain Locus, thinking that
it was one atom. But now I am wandering over to the idea that each DNA
molecule in every cell is the Brain. So the brain is all the cells en
masse. Recently was a show on PBS where a journalist swallowed a
camera to follow its course through his gut and in the show was
explained that the gut has a "gut brain of extensive neurons". So the
brain and neurons are not the seat of where ideas come from, but
rather is the organs to execute the thoughts that have originated
outside the body. So the antenna of a car is not what is thinking but
merely collecting the photons shot from the radio transmitter.

Now we can see that the radio or the TV imitate the human and the
brain of the human. What is needed for a radio and TV to work? We need
a crystal that picks up the EM waves and converts them into sound and
picture. So in a very real sense, humanity has already created
artificial intelligence-- the radio and TV box. For if we were to go
to Mars and find a box and showing us some figures moving around on a
screen and making sounds, we know immediately that although the box is
not alive, there are living creatures somewhere who created this box.
All life on Earth is essentially a box wherein EM photons are shot
into the box
and the brain organs transforms those photons into actions such as
sound or picture or motion or stimulus.

Now this morning I was thinking of where in the brain we have a
picture screen, such as the TV picture screen. I was trying to see if
my thoughts of images was located in the frontal lobe, or middle of
the brain or posterior of the brain. And what I came up with is that
the pictures I see in my mind, are pictures from the eyes. So I close
my eyes and imagine eating some delicious desert and it is in my eye
region. I daydream and still in my eye region. So I conclude, although
sketchy, that the mind's picture screen is in the eyes of its rods and
cones. Now if I were to disassemble a TV we easily see the picture
screen. If I disassemble a radio, the crystal that takes incoming EM
photons is not so apparent.

So the point and message I am conveying here is that the Maxwell
Equations derives Superdeterminism and thus Darwin Evolution falls out
as a subset. All because the photon is a intricate and complex
particle. A consequence is that the mind is out of body thoughts. That
thinking is not chemicals of the brain, but rather electricity and
magnetism coming from the nucleus of the Atom Totality.

--

Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent,
simple and fair author- archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
  #3  
Old April 25th 13, 07:55 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math,sci.physics.electromag
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving Darwin Evolution & Superdeterminism#1317 New Physics #1520 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Now the beauty of this theory of Superdeterminism is that everything
is under control and happens only when it is supposed to happen. There
is no free will.
Everything is slated to happen when it does happen, just as the Sun
will rise tomorrow at a ordained time.
And not only is superdeterminism apply to the living world but to the
nonliving world, meaning that planets and stars and galaxies are
moving as prescribed by a central cosmic force-- the Nucleus of the
Atom Totality.

Darwin Evolution theory is just a minor subset of Superdeterminism,
that gives us guidance and rules as to how the past unfolded. But all
things were predetermined and set in motion by the Nucleus of the Atom
Totality. So that snippets of the photon had dinosaur genes in them
and were released in a specific geological time so that the species
would exist and live during a specific time period. And then made to
disappear so that the next slated species would have time.

But not only is biology superdetermined but the nonliving world is
superdetermined so that its present day Plutonium Atom Totality is
setting the stage for the next higher atomic number Atom Totality.

Now I need to bring in the neutrino along with the photon to make
Superdeterminism. I believe the only significant difference between
the neutrino and the photon is that the photon is a double transverse
wave of electric and magnetic field and the neutrino is a longitudinal
wave of magnetic field.

So let me give a flavor or hint of how superdeterminism works on
nonliving. If we had a bar magnet and started it moving towards a
closed loop wire, we can predict a electric current will move in the
wire. If we wanted planet Earth to be in a specific location in Space
in a million years from now we arrange the mass of the Sun and
surrounding stars so that their EM gravity cells creates a Faraday law
that the motion of Earth is the same as the electric current moving in
the wire.

--

Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent,
simple and fair author- archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
  #4  
Old April 26th 13, 06:20 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math,sci.physics.electromag
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default neutrino longitudinal wave Chapt15.54 Maxwell Eq deriving DarwinEvolution & Superdeterminism #1321 New Physics #1524 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Apparently no physicist of the Standard Model is concerned about the
neutrino as a wave, otherwise the literature would not be dearth about
what wave it is.

Metaphorically, physicists claim they would know all about Europe, but
when you ask them a question it is clear they know nothing about
France; because they know all about a Higgs boson, yet nothing about
the neutrino as wave.

It is cases like this that you want and need to pack up every
physicist and send him/her back to school for an intensive year of
learning of logic, basic logic on how to think clearly.

Ask a physicist whether the neutrino is a single transverse wave, a
double transverse wave, or a longitudinal wave, or some other form of
wave.
Ask them. And then ask them why they believe in a Standard Model which
says nothing about the neutrino wave, yet this same phony Standard
Model has all types of features and properties for a alleged Higgs
boson.

Is it any wonder that the credibility of our modern day physicist is
becoming that of a used car salesman, or a politician running for
office.

So, come on now, if the Standard Model is utterly deaf, dumb and
silent about the neutrino wave, then the Standard Model is worthless
trash and should never have even embarked on a silly notion of a Higgs
boson.

But that is the thing about modern day science. Where any half baked
idea is touted to open up the government coffers of throwing away
billions of dollars on crackpot physics. How many billions have
already been wasted on the Higgs boson? Yet none of those physicists
has ever outlined a neutrino wave.

If the Standard Model is so inept at telling us anything about the
neutrino as a wave, then the Standard Model is nothing but wastrel
physics.

Now the Maxwell Equations can at least start the questioning for they
tell us that the neutrino wave moves through matter as if the matter
was not there at all. This implies the neutrino cannot be a transverse
wave because they do not penetrate matter that well. However,
longitudinal waves such as sound waves are better in a dense medium
such as solid matter. So if longitudinal, what would occupy the poles
of a longitudinal wave. Since it has no electric charge, it must have
just a magnetic poles and could it be a magnetic dipole for two poles?
No, it would have to be two poles of magnetic monopoles, M- and M+
where the - stands for south pole and + stands for north.

So, it is highly likely that neutrinos are longitudinal waves, and
they would be composed of magnetic monopoles.

--
Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.
Besides, Drexel's Math Forum can demand only legal names of
subscribers which hugely prevents search engine bombing and hate spew.
Drexel has done a excellent, simple and fair author- archiving of AP
sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Titius Bode Rule is a Balmer Rydberg rule Chapt16.16 deriving BalmerRydberg from Maxwell Equations #1479 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 April 9th 13 08:02 AM
Titius-Bode Rule becomes a law of physics from Maxwell EquationsChapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1456 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 7 April 4th 13 09:54 AM
Chapt43 Superdeterminism only in an Atom Totality #447 Atom Totality4th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 May 26th 11 07:27 PM
Chapt19; Superdeterminism #223 Atom Totality theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 December 28th 09 04:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.