A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How much more proof does one need?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old November 21st 09, 08:53 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
Henry Wilson DSc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 264
Default How much more proof does one need?

Einstein's second postulate is clearly wrong.

Here is another typical 'cepheid' brightness curve, easily matched with a BaTh
simulation.

The apparent brightness variation is caused by changes in the emitted light's
speed towards Earth as the star orbits it barycentre with a large planet.

Just about ALL 'cepheid' curves can be explained in this way. 'Cepheids' are
not pulsating stars at all. When are astronomers going to wake up and stop
making complete fools of themselves.


Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
pot proof ! White Space Trash Amateur Astronomy 0 December 3rd 08 10:08 PM
Debunked by Proof: Einstein's Relativity Theory Is Wrong! - PROOF #1 qbit Astronomy Misc 6 August 9th 07 04:04 PM
Proof of Evolution. [email protected] UK Astronomy 1 August 3rd 07 08:30 AM
Proof of Astrology William Blake Jr. Astronomy Misc 14 December 27th 06 09:16 PM
No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!? G. L. Bradford Policy 13 July 31st 06 09:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.