![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD POSSIBLE!?!?
To begin with the God of Christianity, Judaism, Islam, etc., is rarely if ever associated with "intelligence." There is one big problem with intelligence, rarely does intelligence and wisdom connect. Often as not sanity is also missing from intelligence, especially higher intelligence. So brains are out the window when it comes to God, though not mind...as in the Mind of God. An amoeba can know the Mind of God better than any genius rated human or alien life form anywhere. Comparability is out the window when it comes to God. Measurement is out the window when it comes to God. Analysis is out the window when it comes to God -- though not deduction. The lower -- the more primitive -- the life form on the scale of life forms, the higher the probability it will know God and the Mind of God. Even the most primitive, most ancient, humans long, long, long before recorded history began, realized that the simplest simpleton among them, usually the youngest child of all among them, if not the as yet to be born, was probably the closest of them all to the Divinity. We could see that in their like in the farthest most primitive backwaters of this world even well into the 20th Century. With good reason to do so, with the best of perceptive wisdom in play to do so, Christianity, Judaism, Islam, etc., have (or at least had) placed the "Creator" ("God") outside His physical "Creation," meaning outside and above (in a way) the Universe and everything, everything whatsoever "physical" in it, including its life, including us....as the only probable 'Other' to it. Scientists, physicists, especially of all people should realize what the word "other" means. Not only what it means, but particularly in this case, the import of a 'constancy' with regard to it and the physical Universe. That import being transformation of 'other' to the entity of the 'infinity' of the Universe. In mathematics (thus mathematical physics), [I would suppose], the symbolic of the import, thus the symbolism of the import, would be the "simple" singular mathematical symbol (in existence since 1655 C.E.) representing "infinity." Only from the "import" can the probability at all of the existence of the "Other to..." be deduced. At least in my estimation of the situation. GLB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moon Landings - Did NASA lie ? | lheureuxph | Misc | 46 | August 25th 04 06:47 PM |
Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? | Yoda | Misc | 102 | August 2nd 04 02:33 AM |
Astral Space part 2 - Crookes work | Majestyk | Misc | 1 | April 14th 04 09:44 AM |
Astral Form - Crookes work (part 2) | expert | UK Astronomy | 0 | April 13th 04 12:05 PM |
Proof that 2 and only 2 methods for landing on Mars and astro bodies | Archimedes Plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 18 | January 12th 04 09:40 AM |