A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old July 27th 06, 12:22 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.space.policy
G. L. Bradford
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 258
Default No Scientific Proof Of God Possible!?!?

NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD POSSIBLE!?!?

To begin with the God of Christianity, Judaism, Islam, etc., is rarely if
ever associated with "intelligence." There is one big problem with
intelligence, rarely does intelligence and wisdom connect. Often as not
sanity is also missing from intelligence, especially higher intelligence. So
brains are out the window when it comes to God, though not mind...as in the
Mind of God. An amoeba can know the Mind of God better than any genius rated
human or alien life form anywhere. Comparability is out the window when it
comes to God. Measurement is out the window when it comes to God. Analysis
is out the window when it comes to God -- though not deduction.

The lower -- the more primitive -- the life form on the scale of life
forms, the higher the probability it will know God and the Mind of God. Even
the most primitive, most ancient, humans long, long, long before recorded
history began, realized that the simplest simpleton among them, usually the
youngest child of all among them, if not the as yet to be born, was probably
the closest of them all to the Divinity. We could see that in their like in
the farthest most primitive backwaters of this world even well into the 20th
Century.

With good reason to do so, with the best of perceptive wisdom in play to
do so, Christianity, Judaism, Islam, etc., have (or at least had) placed the
"Creator" ("God") outside His physical "Creation," meaning outside and above
(in a way) the Universe and everything, everything whatsoever "physical" in
it, including its life, including us....as the only probable 'Other' to it.
Scientists, physicists, especially of all people should realize what the
word "other" means. Not only what it means, but particularly in this case,
the import of a 'constancy' with regard to it and the physical Universe.
That import being transformation of 'other' to the entity of the 'infinity'
of the Universe. In mathematics (thus mathematical physics), [I would
suppose], the symbolic of the import, thus the symbolism of the import,
would be the "simple" singular mathematical symbol (in existence since 1655
C.E.) representing "infinity."

Only from the "import" can the probability at all of the existence of the
"Other to..." be deduced. At least in my estimation of the situation.

GLB


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moon Landings - Did NASA lie ? lheureuxph Misc 46 August 25th 04 06:47 PM
Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? Yoda Misc 102 August 2nd 04 02:33 AM
Astral Space part 2 - Crookes work Majestyk Misc 1 April 14th 04 09:44 AM
Astral Form - Crookes work (part 2) expert UK Astronomy 0 April 13th 04 12:05 PM
Proof that 2 and only 2 methods for landing on Mars and astro bodies Archimedes Plutonium Astronomy Misc 18 January 12th 04 09:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.