![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Don't be so picky Fred, I was rounding. Yes, the Hubble has a 2.4 meter mirror. The KH-11 spysat was current technology at the time Hubble was under development and had a very similar sized mirror, I've heard either 2.3 meter or 2.4 meter. The actual size is still classified I believe. I think so too. But the Soviets got sold a Top Secret manual of the KH-11 around 1975 by a CIA guy. I would much like to read it, you too? ![]() In any case, Perkins did indeed grind the mirrors for the Keyhole satellites as well as Hubble and had equipment in place to handle blanks capable of resulting in an approximately 2.4 meter finished mirror size. I don't think these facts are really in doubt. Certainly Perkin's experience, capability, and then current equipment was a factor in the final mirror sized that was selected for Hubble. Here's an extract from the KH-11 entry on Wikipedia: "Nine or ten KH-11 satellites were launched between 1976 and 1990 aboard Titan-3D and -34D rockets, with one launch failure. The KH-11 replaced the KH-9 film return satellite, among others, the last of which was lost in a liftoff explosion in 1986. It is believed to resemble the Hubble Space Telescope in size and shape, as the satellites were shipped in similar containers. IIRC that was mentioned by Henry Furthermore, a NASA history of the Hubble[3] states about the reasons for switching from a 3 meter main mirror to a 2.4 meter design: 'In addition, changing to a 2.4-meter mirror would lessen fabrication costs by using manufacturing technologies developed for military spy satellites.' " Not just the outer dimensions, even the optics may had some similarities with the KH-11. The USAF (may got rumours that Perkin Elmer screwed the grind) offered NASA (MSFC) an end to end test for free on their own optical test stand. MSFC declined the offer. I suspect the KH-11 did not use the hyperbolic Ritchey-Chretien System but a more simple one to grind. Thats why PE needed a special test rig they screwed in building. Btw, the Solar panels were not from the KH-11 but ESA. The KH-11 people did know that the ESA panels wont work, but it was launched anyway. SENECA ## CrossPoint v3.12d R ## |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Could the Mars Rover Technology become Military Weapons? | Jonathan | Space Shuttle | 21 | November 12th 09 08:38 PM |
military weapons | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 5 | April 19th 07 10:51 AM |
NASA technology helping military airctaft remain in top condition | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | November 12th 04 06:18 PM |