Dark matter doesn't exist

See
http://www.eso.org/public/archives/r...17/eso1217.pdf
and
http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1217/

jacob navia wrote in
:

See
http://www.eso.org/public/archives/r.../eso1217/eso12
17.pdf and
http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1217/

No, that's not what the paper says.

Le 19/04/12 22:35, eric gisse a écrit :
jacob wrote in
:

See
http://www.eso.org/public/archives/r.../eso1217/eso12
17.pdf and
http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1217/

No, that's not what the paper says.

Of course not.

You *never* say "This nonsense doesn't exist" in a scientific paper.
You say

"New lower limit established for the existence of FOO"


I cite from the paper:

quote
In conclusion, the observations point to a lack of Galactic DM at the
solar position, contrary to the expectations of all the current models
of Galactic mass distribution.
end quote

On 4/19/12 2:22 AM, jacob navia wrote:
See
http://www.eso.org/public/archives/r...17/eso1217.pdf
and
http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1217/
The look at 13,000 light years distant
represents ~5 percent of the milky way disc
with galactic diameter 120,000 light year
(probably much more with dark matter halo)

26,000^2/120,000^2 = .047

Any spherical assumption
would make the observed milky way fraction approach 1 percent

26,000^3/120,000^3 = .010

Dark matter may be clumpy.
Observations indicate we are not in a clump.

Richard D. Saam